| Author | Message |
|---|
|
|
|
Please report errors for Windows systems in this thread. Provide a link to the results and the nature of the error. Also please be informative but brief. Try to avoid long quotes from your message window unless someone asks.
____________
Moderator9
RALPH@home FAQs
RALPH@home Guidelines
Moderator Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I try it again:
14 Hours after this thread was opened, one of my boxes downloaded a Ralph-WU 5.00 (is it really 5.00 or is it 5.01 ?)
I saw this, updated the CC from 5.4.3 to 5.4.4. and looked, what will happen ...
The WU crashed later on, a lot of files got downloaded and now, it looks as if there is a report that you were looking for:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90345
Hope this helps
____________
Supporting BOINC, a great concept ! |
|
|
|
|
|
I assumed the 5.0 units I got were relics but maybe not, as there seems to be some confusion about whether 5.00 is .00 or .01. Anyway in case they\'re current, and because 4/5 crashed and I hadn\'t seen any bug reports about them -- here is where I posted links to my latest bad ones on the old thread.
(Two were invalid function exits; two were -1073741819 exits.) |
|
|
|
|
I assumed the 5.0 units I got were relics but maybe not, as there seems to be some confusion about whether 5.00 is .00 or .01. Anyway in case they\'re current, and because 4/5 crashed and I hadn\'t seen any bug reports about them -- here is where I posted links to my latest bad ones on the old thread.
(Two were invalid function exits; two were -1073741819 exits.)
I cannot explain to you (yet) why the version number is showing as 5.0. What I can do is show you this post, and this page. Which seem very clear that at least the developers think version 5.01 is what is running in RALPH.
When I can get more information about this I will report it. Until then just use the Version 5.01 reporting threads.
____________
Moderator9
RALPH@home FAQs
RALPH@home Guidelines
Moderator Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys. Sorry for the confusion; I spoke too soon. 5.01 didn\'t get activated until a few hours ago. We\'re sending out jobs with the new app now.
I assumed the 5.0 units I got were relics but maybe not, as there seems to be some confusion about whether 5.00 is .00 or .01. Anyway in case they\'re current, and because 4/5 crashed and I hadn\'t seen any bug reports about them -- here is where I posted links to my latest bad ones on the old thread.
(Two were invalid function exits; two were -1073741819 exits.)
I cannot explain to you (yet) why the version number is showing as 5.0. What I can do is show you this post, and this page. Which seem very clear that at least the developers think version 5.01 is what is running in RALPH.
When I can get more information about this I will report it. Until then just use the Version 5.01 reporting threads.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
deleted (error was for version 5.00, not 5.01 --- now posted in proper thread)
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have one 5.01 running , now 18% done
NO BUGS YET on Version 5.01 to report
ps: It displays as 5.01 *not* 5.00
Thus, no confusion too.
Thanks
____________
Click signature for global team stats
  |
|
|
|
|
|
HM, meanwhile my boxes have already crunched 8 WUs of real 5.01, all looks fine at the moment.
____________
Supporting BOINC, a great concept ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Right now this WU is running at about 60% and it looks alive and kicking.
I had a couple of crashed 5.0\'s yesterday though http://ralph.bakerlab.org/results.php?userid=585 but they both seems to be flawed anyway.
And I upgraded to BOINC client 5.4.4 today.
____________
"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me
 |
|
|
|
|
|
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90578
<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message> - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 3887591
# random seed: 3887591
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
</stderr_txt>
this error appeared when the graphic is shown on screen.
I \'ve faced another error like this before this beta version. sorry but i can\'t remember the version. Both were being run on windows xp 64bit.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
Right now this WU is running at about 60% and it looks alive and kicking.
Well finished. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90386
____________
"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just had one of those 0xc000005 guys here:
resultid
running winxp on p4 3.6 ghz w/ht turned on.
it was the last Ralph in my queue, all the others completed fine.
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the helpful posts! Pieface, these 0xc000005 errors are the really
mysterious ones -- on some clients they happen over and over again on different kinds of jobs. But your machine has had a lot of successes, and then just this one error, so that indicates that this is problem is cropping up everywhere. Next week, Rom is going to put an update into Boinc that should give more meaningful stacktraces and hopefully let us pin down the problem.
The overall error rate for ralph 5.01 has been very low. Is anyone out there seeing stuck jobs (where the graphics no longer updates)?
Just had one of those 0xc000005 guys here:
resultid
running winxp on p4 3.6 ghz w/ht turned on.
it was the last Ralph in my queue, all the others completed fine.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
version 5.02 has been released |
|
|
