Posts by [B^S] thierry@home

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.55 (Message 2915) Posted 28 Mar 2007 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: Hi, I just get a WU 5.55: 1l2x__BOINC_INCREASE_CYCLES10_RNA_ABINITIO-1l2x_-_1868_11_0 It starts crunching with a % in Progress = 100%. But it continues to crunch. The screen saver is normal except that the % is written : 1 then 00000000.... through the entire screen.
2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.30 and 5.31 and 5.32 (Message 2370) Posted 9 Oct 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I have a WU: JUMPTEST_POSERELAX_VARY_BOND_ANGLES_1tul__1336_32_0 (5.31) stuck at 1% - Model 1 - Step 360000 for 20 minutes. Then starts working. After 45 minutes: step 360131 but still at 1%. Don't know if it's normal or not.
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.30 and 5.31 and 5.32 (Message 2369) Posted 9 Oct 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I have a WU: JUMPTEST_POSERELAX_VARY_BOND_ANGLES_1tul__1336_32_0 (5.31) stuck at 1% - Model 1 - Step 360000 for 20 minutes. Then starts working.
4) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.25 (Message 2258) Posted 29 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I just get a WU that crashes immediately: 8/29/2006 8:44:32 PM\|ralph@home\|Sending scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi 8/29/2006 8:44:32 PM\|ralph@home\|Reason: To fetch work 8/29/2006 8:44:32 PM\|ralph@home\|Requesting 19008 seconds of new work 8/29/2006 8:44:37 PM\|ralph@home\|Scheduler request succeeded 8/29/2006 8:44:39 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file aa2int_03_05.200_v1_3.gz 8/29/2006 8:44:39 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file aa2int_09_05.200_v1_3.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:10 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file aa2int_03_05.200_v1_3.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:10 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 54665 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:45:10 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file 2int_.fasta.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:11 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file 2int_.fasta.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:11 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 475 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:45:11 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file 2int.loop_file.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:12 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file 2int.loop_file.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:12 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 240 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:45:12 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file 2int_1_model_12_idl.pdb.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:15 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file 2int_1_model_12_idl.pdb.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:15 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 32415 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:45:15 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file paths_200_2int.txt 8/29/2006 8:45:16 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file paths_200_2int.txt 8/29/2006 8:45:16 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 3689 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:45:20 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file aa2int_09_05.200_v1_3.gz 8/29/2006 8:45:20 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 96325 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:45:21 PM\|\|Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 8/29/2006 8:45:21 PM\|rosetta@home\|Pausing task BENCH_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1iibA_BARCODE_R55_filters_1214_6701_0 (left in memory) 8/29/2006 8:45:22 PM\|ralph@home\|Starting task NMR_2int_CASPR_1_2int_1_model_12IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1266_6_0 using rosetta_beta version 525 8/29/2006 8:45:59 PM\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 8/29/2006 8:45:59 PM\|ralph@home\|Computation for task NMR_2int_CASPR_1_2int_1_model_12IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1266_6_0 finished 8/29/2006 8:45:59 PM\|rosetta@home\|Resuming task BENCH_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1iibA_BARCODE_R55_filters_1214_6701_0 using rosetta version 525 8/29/2006 8:46:00 PM\|ralph@home\|Unrecoverable error for result NMR_2int_CASPR_1_2int_1_model_12IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1266_6_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>NMR_2int_CASPR_1_2int_1_model_12IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1266_6_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code></file_xfer_error>) 8/29/2006 8:48:41 PM\|ralph@home\|Sending scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi 8/29/2006 8:48:41 PM\|ralph@home\|Reason: To fetch work 8/29/2006 8:48:41 PM\|ralph@home\|Requesting 19008 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 8/29/2006 8:48:46 PM\|ralph@home\|Scheduler request succeeded 8/29/2006 8:48:48 PM\|ralph@home\|Started download of file 2int_1_model_11_idl.pdb.gz 8/29/2006 8:48:51 PM\|ralph@home\|Finished download of file 2int_1_model_11_idl.pdb.gz 8/29/2006 8:48:51 PM\|ralph@home\|Throughput 18677 bytes/sec 8/29/2006 8:48:52 PM\|\|Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 8/29/2006 8:48:52 PM\|rosetta@home\|Pausing task BENCH_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1iibA_BARCODE_R55_filters_1214_6701_0 (left in memory) 8/29/2006 8:48:53 PM\|ralph@home\|Starting task NMR_2int_CASPR_1_2int_1_model_11IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1266_7_1 using rosetta_beta version 525 8/29/2006 8:49:30 PM\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 8/29/2006 8:49:30 PM\|ralph@home\|Computation for task NMR_2int_CASPR_1_2int_1_model_11IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1266_7_1 finished Windows XP pro sp2 P4 3.0 HT (on) 1 Gb RAM BOINC 5.4.11
5) Message boards : Current tests : Strange WUs (Message 2224) Posted 23 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: Theirry, the "no finished file" message means the manager temporarily lost track of the daemon. The daemon (which actually controls the work) should have kept running. It's just reporting the manager (the part you see) lost contact. tony OK... and that's why the Calculation time drop from 32 minutes to 18 minutes?
6) Message boards : Current tests : Strange WUs (Message 2209) Posted 21 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I just had something strange (in my point of view) with the unit 1hz6A_CONTROL_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT__1256_1_0 Windows XP pro sp2 P4 3.0 HT RAM 1Gb Here what I can see: It was crunching a Ralph WU & a Leiden WU The Ralph WU was running for +/- 16 minutes at 1.043%. Then the percentage done jump to 7.403% At around 32 minutes of crunching, the BOINC manager frozen: CPU activity: 2/3% RAM: drop from 1.22 Gb to +/- 930 Mb ANd this during +/- 2 minutes, with the following message in the BOINC manager: 21/08/2006 21:31:01\|ralph@home\|Resuming task 1hz6A_CONTROL_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT__1256_1_0 using rosetta_beta version 525 21/08/2006 21:32:36\|Leiden Classical\|Sending scheduler request to http://boinc.gorlaeus.net/Classical_cgi/cgi 21/08/2006 21:32:36\|Leiden Classical\|Reason: To fetch work 21/08/2006 21:32:36\|Leiden Classical\|Requesting 6403 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 21/08/2006 21:32:41\|Leiden Classical\|Scheduler request succeeded 21/08/2006 21:32:43\|Leiden Classical\|Started download of file cu111leps_trajtou.inp_80398718_1156170482_416 21/08/2006 21:32:44\|Leiden Classical\|Finished download of file cu111leps_trajtou.inp_80398718_1156170482_416 21/08/2006 21:32:44\|Leiden Classical\|Throughput 26983 bytes/sec 21/08/2006 21:32:45\|\|Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 21/08/2006 21:32:45\|rosetta@home\|Pausing task FRA_t368_CASPR_hom001_7_t368_7_dec32IGNORE_THE_REST_2_1179_223_0 (left in memory) 21/08/2006 21:32:45\|Leiden Classical\|Resuming task wu_649415041_1156170482_155_0 using trajtou-pd110paw version 533 21/08/2006 21:33:01\|Leiden Classical\|Sending scheduler request to http://boinc.gorlaeus.net/Classical_cgi/cgi 21/08/2006 21:33:01\|Leiden Classical\|Reason: To fetch work 21/08/2006 21:33:01\|Leiden Classical\|Requesting 1564 seconds of new work 21/08/2006 21:33:06\|Leiden Classical\|Scheduler request succeeded 21/08/2006 21:33:06\|Leiden Classical\|Message from server: No work sent 21/08/2006 21:33:06\|Leiden Classical\|No work from project 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|boincsimap\|Task 60801003.045372_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|boincsimap\|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|rosetta@home\|Task FRA_t368_CASPR_hom001_7_t368_7_dec32IGNORE_THE_REST_2_1179_223_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|rosetta@home\|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|rosetta@home\|Task FRA_t368_CASPR_hom001_7_t368_7_dec13IGNORE_THE_REST_4_1179_268_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|rosetta@home\|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|Leiden Classical\|Task wu_649415041_1156170482_155_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|Leiden Classical\|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|ralph@home\|Task 1hz6A_CONTROL_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT__1256_1_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|ralph@home\|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|\|Rescheduling CPU: application exited 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|Leiden Classical\|Restarting task wu_649415041_1156170482_155_0 using trajtou-pd110paw version 533 21/08/2006 21:47:15\|ralph@home\|Restarting task 1hz6A_CONTROL_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT__1256_1_0 using rosetta_beta version 525 Then the Wu restarted but with the Calculation time back to 18 minutes (and still at 7.043) Now the WU is again around 32 minutes with 11.52% completed + CPU 100% and RAM 1.03 Gb. It seems it runs normally now. Hope this can help in something
7) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 2108) Posted 16 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: But some people use the optimized client to compensate some low credits due to this or that. So a new credit system and a credit recalulation from February shouldn't change their results that much. They would be happy to have finally the real credits for the work done......
8) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 2065) Posted 16 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I thought there were joining for science. David, Do whatever you want, as far credits are fair for everyone it's OK for me. There are +/- 76000 users registered at Rosetta. We only hear here a few who want keep their credits at any price. We never hear the 76000 minus a few.
9) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 2001) Posted 12 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=233#1973
10) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 1974) Posted 11 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: Sounds good :-)
11) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 1971) Posted 11 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: Thanks Feet1st. Got it. In fact the first is slower compares to the second (P4 3.0 HT vs Pentium D 2.8) Just a question: what are you in the real life? Teacher in some subjects? Because your explanations are always so clear and understandable, it's a pleasure to read you.
12) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 1966) Posted 11 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: That seems OK to me. And with this you know exactly what you have done (as Seti Classic did). The principle seems OK but... I have not followed all the discussions and there is something I don't understand very well. I take an example: - I have one PC which runs Rosetta with a 'Target CPU run time' of 10 hours. The current running WU runs for 9 hours and have 143 models. So it will be something like 318 credits for 10 hours. - I have another PC with a 'Target CPU run time' of one day. The current WU runs for 2.5 hours and have now 5 models. That's something like 96 credits for 24 hours. Isn't that strange?
13) Message boards : Current tests : New crediting system (Message 1946) Posted 9 Aug 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I have finished a WU, apparently with the new credit system. Here are the results: Win XP Pro sp2 Pentium 4 3.0 HT RAM 1Gb BOINC 5.5.0 ;-) WU: 1qysA_BOINC_ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__1109_99 CPU Time: 21127 seconds Models: 17 Claim credits: 98.1 Granted credits: 34.00 Average credits: 5.80 per hour
14) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 756) Posted 28 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: OK, I've restarted it. Will see.... Thanks
15) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 753) Posted 28 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I have a WU 4.90 stuck at 1% for 1h05'. The graphics are more or less freezed. THe protein shape moves a little bit every +/- 20 seconds. What do I do with this WU? I have suspended it until I know what to do. WU number : HOMSb7_homDB005_1b72_226_2 CPU : P4 3.0Ghz HT OS : XP SP2
16) Message boards : Number crunching : Crash (Message 70) Posted 16 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: In fact it was on 'Home' because I didn't realize the project has created new Hosts ID when I detached/attached. So I merged the computers, set venue on work, update the project, set project on 'Use preferences...' and everything is running smoothly (except there's no work ;-)). I really need to think a little bit more before shooting. Thanks everybody
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Crash (Message 68) Posted 16 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: OK it works. Well I'm attached to the project and the others projects are still running. There's no work for the moment but as soon there's work I suppose it will start crunching. Am I supposed to leave it on 'Run always'? Is it required by the project for the moment or it will change? Thanks anyway.
18) Message boards : Number crunching : Crash (Message 64) Posted 16 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: I tried again today to attach to Ralph. Here's what I got : 16/02/2006 20:58:50\|\|Fetching config info from http://ralph.bakerlab.org/get_project_config.php 16/02/2006 20:59:17\|http://ralph.bakerlab.org/\|Master file download succeeded 16/02/2006 20:59:17\|http://ralph.bakerlab.org/\|Sending scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi 16/02/2006 20:59:17\|http://ralph.bakerlab.org/\|Reason: Requested by user 16/02/2006 20:59:17\|http://ralph.bakerlab.org/\|Requesting 17280 seconds of new work 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|http://ralph.bakerlab.org/\|Scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi succeeded 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|ralph@home\|General preferences have been updated 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|ralph@home\|New host venue: home 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|\|General prefs: from ralph@home (last modified 2006-02-16 00:11:12) 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|\|General prefs: no separate prefs for work; using your defaults 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|ralph@home\|Successfully attached to ralph@home 16/02/2006 20:59:19\|\|Suspending computation and network activity - user is active All activities are suspended. Waiting 10 minutes, nothing happens.... Any idea?
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Crash (Message 8) Posted 15 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: No, I tried again and got 2 new WUs that are in status Downloading but nothing happens, all others activities are suspended and the tab Transferts is empty. Removed Ralph and it starts crunching again.
20) Message boards : Number crunching : Crash (Message 6) Posted 15 Feb 2006 by [B^S] thierry@home Post: Hi, I just join the project and at the moment I attached the Boinc manager, I got 2 Ralph WUs which crashes a standard Rosetta WU with an unexpectable error and suspend all activities until I detach from the project. What's up doc?