Posts by Conan
|
1)
Message boards :
News :
Rosetta version 4.20 released for testing
(Message 6804)
Posted 2 May 2020 by  Conan
Post: I posted this over in the 4.12 thread as I didn't see this thread. Running Linux got this error as did my Wingman Tried running a couple of 4.20 work units, but they both failed after less than 1 1/2 minutes with the error 'Process got Signal 11" Haven't tried again as computer is busy doing other work. Conan |
|
2)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta 4.12+
(Message 6785)
Posted 1 May 2020 by Conan
Post: Tried running a couple of 4.20 work units, but they both failed after less than 1 1/2 minutes with the error 'Process got Signal 11" This also happened with my wingman he got the same error. Conan |
|
3)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta 4.07
(Message 6581)
Posted 1 Aug 2018 by Conan
Post: Just had 40 work units all fail with "Process got Signal 11" error. Example Task 4892528 Conan |
|
4)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta 4.07
(Message 6580)
Posted 1 Aug 2018 by Conan
Post: I had quite a few aborted by the Project, most had been running for around 3 hours then cancelled. I have also gotten a validate error. Conan |
|
5)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta 4.07
(Message 6578)
Posted 31 Jul 2018 by Conan
Post: Getting a number of errors with this latest batch <core_client_version>7.4.25</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> finish file present too long </message> <stderr_txt> command: ../../projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/rosetta_4.07_i686-pc-linux-gnu -run:protocol jd2_scripting @flags_rb_07_27_541_784__t000__0_C3_robetta -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip input_rb_07_27_541_784__t000__0_C3_robetta.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 3600 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1854370 Starting watchdog... Watchdog active. ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 10962.7 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: WS_max 0 BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... 13:02:13 (9306): called boinc_finish(0) </stderr_txt> See Task 4880552 Task 4880553 Task 4880524 Conan |
|
6)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6574)
Posted 21 Jun 2018 by Conan
Post: Still getting work units that run successfully but give very low credits, just 45 on average, for a 6 Hour work unit. This is well down on what is normally issued for a work unit (up to 200+) See WU 4872271 WU 4872276 WU 4872277 wu 4872279 This was on a 64 Bit Linux machine. Conan |
|
7)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6570)
Posted 28 May 2018 by Conan
Post: [quote]Looks like whoever wrote the message on 24/4/18 is still waiting for information on which versions of Windows were used for the 32 bit failures. If so, there's no point in complaining about lack of another message or fix until more people supply this information. [Quote] G'Day Robert, I was not complaining, I was bringing back to the forefront of awareness a problem which dates back to at least the beginging of Feburary (2018). 32 Bit Rosetta work units have been failing for many months, but no fix yet. They fail on both Ralph and Rosetta, as the administrators of the Rosetta project have not used their test project Ralph properly before releasing work on the main project. The problems are supposed to be fixed here first then released to Rosetta. Other problems were listed here about Linux work units as well but still they went ahead and released work on Rosetta. So now they have a lot more people complaing (over at Rosetta) about failing work units (32 bit, 64 bit, Windows and Linux) because they did not seem to take heed of what the test project was telling them. We try to help these people but if they don't take action on what we report then the results will be poor. So just trying to help the Project, as I have been doing since the test project was launched. Have a great day. Conan |
|
8)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6561)
Posted 24 May 2018 by Conan
Post: Just had 19 failures on an Linux 64 bit machine with this Error Process got signal 11 No idea why, they failed within a minute of starting. They all downloaded with an estimated run time of 1 hour, my preferences are set for 6 hours. See This WU for example Conan |
|
9)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6559)
Posted 23 May 2018 by Conan
Post: I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else. Well if it is affecting me then it could affecting others, so that is why I am letting them know what is going on. After all this is their test project so they should be more aware what is happening here before they stuff up the main Rosetta project. But as you said they are a bit slow around here in responding to our posts. There was a post on the 24/4/18 saying they were going to look into the 32 bit failure rate issue, but nothing has happened and my work units still fail on 32 bit (only the Rosetta ones, the Rosetta Mini ones are fine). Conan |
|
10)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6557)
Posted 23 May 2018 by Conan
Post: I just finished processing 24 work units and all of them have only given me around 30 credits each for 6 hour of work each. That is 720 credits for 144 hours of processor time, that is 5 credits per hour. What happened to the credit? I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else. Admin please take a look into this please. Conan |
|
11)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6555)
Posted 22 May 2018 by Conan
Post: Something has chamged with this latest batch of work units, only getting 10% to 12% of the normal credit, just 29 credits for 6 hours work. Example this work unit Conan |
|
12)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6554)
Posted 21 May 2018 by Conan
Post: 32 Bit Rosetta work units are still failing to run on my 32 bit XP Windows machine. The older Rosetta Mini work units run without an issue. Have had no response from Admin about this since April, and it is still not fixed. The applications don't start as they have the following error couldn't start app: CreateProcess() failed - (unknown error) Conan |
|
13)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6543)
Posted 24 Apr 2018 by Conan
Post: The application listing shows 32 Bit is supposed to work, it does NOT. Yes boboviz, you seem to be right. I have this same message running over at Rosetta as well as here and I am getting the same response. This issue was reported on the Rosetta forum back on the 1st of Feb 2018, and still no response and no fix has been forthcoming. You try and help these projects as much as you can, but when you can't get reponses from the people running the projects then you have to say to yourself "Why Bother". Conan |
|
14)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6541)
Posted 22 Apr 2018 by Conan
Post: Same here. This error is still happening on both Ralph and Rosetta with the Rosetta WU. The Rosetta Mini WUs are all OK on both 32 bit Windows XP and on 64 bit Linux. The application listing shows 32 Bit is supposed to work, it does NOT. My question is the "Rosetta Mini" work units run without an issue, on both 32 bit and 64 bit, but the new "Rosetta" work units fail on the 32 bit. So I am asking again, what has changed to cause the problem? Conan |
|
15)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6531)
Posted 14 Apr 2018 by Conan
Post: I am getting the same error still. On both Ralph and Rosetta, for these XP 32 bit tasks, ALL fail. That may or may not be the case, however it suits my needs and I don't need 64 bits to do what I do with this computer. Check the application listing, 32 Bit is supposed to work, it does NOT. My question is the "Rosetta Mini" work units run without an issue, on both 32 bit and 64 bit, but the new "Rosetta" work units fail on the 32 bit. So I am asking what has changed to cause the problem. Conan |
|
16)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6529)
Posted 13 Apr 2018 by Conan
Post: Same here. I am getting the same error still. On both Ralph and Rosetta, for these XP 32 bit tasks, ALL fail. Linux works OK. Conan |
|
17)
Message boards :
Cafe RALPH :
5 years with Ralph
(Message 6524)
Posted 9 Apr 2018 by Conan
Post: I've got a couple on you [VENETO] boboviz. Over 12 years at Ralph for me. I am sure our commitment helps the project, by how much I have no idea. Conan |
|
18)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6522)
Posted 9 Apr 2018 by Conan
Post: Same here. Still getting this error on ALL 32 bit Windows XP tasks, NONE of them work. Same thing happened on the main project, obviously released too early before being fixed here on RALPH. Conan |
|
19)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6506)
Posted 24 Mar 2018 by Conan
Post: All my 4.07 work units have failed, eith immediately (Windows XP 32 bit) or after 1 minute (Linux 64 bit) I get Can't create Process on Windows (doesn't appear to be anti-virus related) Or Process got Signal 11 on Linux. Conan |
|
20)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
(Message 6244)
Posted 22 Nov 2017 by Conan
Post: Credit issue, I have had 2 work units that only received the credit they claimed, and no adjustment for final credit amount. See Result 4178106 Also Result=4178099 Or did these two work units just not do enough work? Conan |
Next 20
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org