Posts by feet1st

1) Message boards : Number crunching : High memory usage by v4.07 task rb_03_24_16_25__t000__0_C2_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_20741 (Message 6510) Posted 26 Mar 2018 by feet1st Post: I got two of these tasks from Ralph. Both are consuming about 900M of memory as they run on Windows 7. Two v4.07 tasks from R@h have a max working set of 400M with current working set closer to 200M.
2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta 3.05 (Message 5308) Posted 18 May 2011 by feet1st Post: By limiting the number of tasks per core, they are spreading the work across more machines and getting a more representative sampling on how the BOINC community gets along with the new code, what problems are encountered etc.
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta Beta 3.06 (Message 5286) Posted 7 May 2011 by feet1st Post: Graphics just crashes on Windows. Window starts to open and then dies. And shortly thereafter, BOINC seems to lose control of the process and it no longer gets CPU time, even though BOINC Manager says it is running.
4) Message boards : Current tests : Cannot upload (Message 5232) Posted 18 Dec 2010 by feet1st Post: Rosetta is down right now, so there must be some new hardware problems in Seattle today. I can't upload either.
5) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 2.17 (Message 5224) Posted 20 Nov 2010 by feet1st Post: What information do you need to help debug this problem. I would think they would at least like to know the task name. Was the 75hrs CPU time? Or "elapsed" time? Is the task manager showing it getting CPU?
6) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 2.17 (Message 5220) Posted 11 Nov 2010 by feet1st Post: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1989563 ERROR: no convergence in svdcmp Only ran 44 seconds.
7) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta 1.67 (Message 4816) Posted 7 May 2009 by feet1st Post: Please explain more about "nifty new threading mode" when you get a chance. Is this something we will see in the graphic? Or pursuing multiple models simultaneously? Or what? Will it take more memory to run?
8) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta_1.64 (Message 4812) Posted 4 May 2009 by feet1st Post: Have Rosetta@home and Ralph@home switched roles in which of them tests new versions of applications first? I've already received several minirosetta 1.65 workunits from Rosetta@home, without seeing any sign that there have been any Ralph@home tests of that version at all. INteresting... me too ... I wonder if they just screwed the version number where 1.65 is 1.64 with a new dress ... They had to correct the upload problems If you go to the homepage of both Ralph and Rosetta and click the "applications" link, you can see it was posted to Ralph first.
9) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta_1.64 (Message 4805) Posted 29 Apr 2009 by feet1st Post: WinXP, BOINC 5.10.45 this task called broker_lb_test3_hb_t288__IGNORE_THE_REST_9374_4_0 had a 24hr runtime preference, but ended after only 3hrs with these msgs: ERROR: pose.fold_tree().is_cutpoint( *it ) ERROR:: Exit from: ....srcprotocolstopology_brokerTopologyBroker.cc line: 560 It finished as a "valid" "success" and so was not resent to get a second opinion on whether or not it would fail elsewhere.
10) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Rosetta version 5.98 (Message 4786) Posted 17 Apr 2009 by feet1st Post: This one is running over 5 hours per model. It is called r120g_BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-r120g-_9223_30_0
11) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta 1.61 (Message 4777) Posted 16 Apr 2009 by feet1st Post: minirosetta_database_rev28862.zip ...116MB??? The other DBs were more like 16!
12) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4772) Posted 14 Apr 2009 by feet1st Post: I've had a number of WUs with names like this: rest3d85_ip40_2g3r.patchdock.3.pdb_0002_fa_dock.xml_score12_pert38_DOCK_9104 All 4 ran through 99 models in just 3hours. That will throw off work fetch for folks on Rosetta with longer runtime preference.
13) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4740) Posted 16 Mar 2009 by feet1st Post: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1357309 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1357310 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1357311 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1357312 In each case, when your task failed another task was generated for the work unit, and the next person was able to run it without error. Seems to point to some problem on your machine. Overclocking? Dust bunnies clogging cooling system? Memory failing?
14) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4739) Posted 16 Mar 2009 by feet1st Post: Stage "unk"?? So... it's "unknown"? (and truncated?) The protein seemed to slip off the pane too. I just saw black until it later came in to view.
15) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4731) Posted 15 Mar 2009 by feet1st Post: this mamaln task was preempted at like 98% complete. When BOINC got back to it, it immediately (16 seconds later) finished. No other suspicious messages about the task. Status page shows scheduler is active, but I'm getting these when I try to update. Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data)
16) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4727) Posted 13 Mar 2009 by feet1st Post: A few tasks lately have produced large outfiles, and ended prematurely (as compared to my 24hr runtime preference). Presumably due to the 99 model limit. But I thought you would want to be aware of them. runtime !result size !task 11:41 !1.6MB !1343012 10hrs !unknown !1339103 21:41 !2.56MB !1343325 These are all the loopbuild tasks of various flavors.
17) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4721) Posted 4 Mar 2009 by feet1st Post: This one had a result file over 1MB. It's name is cc_2_2_mamcstmix_cen_bounded_0.1_hb_t311__ IGNORE_THE_REST_1B0NA_6_8133_1_0 It also ended after under 15 hrs on my 24hr preference. Looks like it hit the 99 model limit.
18) Message boards : Feedback : Where did you get this Forum Code? (Message 4718) Posted 2 Mar 2009 by feet1st Post: I believe it is all part of the open source that comes with BOINC. Here's a couple of links to get you started: BOINC source Forum doc In your case, you are going to have to pull the forum code out of the rest of the BOINC server it was designed to live with. Assuming that is all you want. But it's all in there somewhere.
19) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : where do we post 5.98 errors? (Message 4663) Posted 6 Feb 2009 by feet1st Post: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=398
20) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.58 (Message 4656) Posted 2 Feb 2009 by feet1st Post: "...it does" what when maximized? Scale properly? My "square" boxes still aren't square, they are short by the thickness of the titlebar.

Next 20