Posts by Sabroe_SMC

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom 0.03 (nvidia_alpha) (Message 7795)
Posted 7 Jul 2024 by Sabroe_SMC
Post:
Momently i have NO CPU tasks running
2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom 0.03 (nvidia_alpha) (Message 7791)
Posted 6 Jul 2024 by Sabroe_SMC
Post:
Hello guys
Are you foolish or what?
Not as foolish as you for running two at time.
Per Task runtime doesn't matter- the number per hour is what matters.

On my RTX 2060 & RTX 2060 Super the GPU load is around 75% to 80% for these Tasks.
Given that the GPU load is over 50%, and it requires about 1.3 CPU cores to support one Task, even if you give them 3 CPU cores to support 2 GPU Tasks when running two at a time, and the fact that the application has not been optimised much (if at all) as shown by the frequent dips in the GPU load & less frequent but very regular large dips in GPU load, it doesn't make much sense to run 2 at a time.

Run one at a time & see how it goes.


As for the Credit per Task- it's Alpha work, things will change as they progress. At least for the last batch the Credit per Task was much more consistent than the earlier batches & applications.
And as for their Runtime- while they take longer than the last batch, they are still taking less time than the first batch i was able to process on the GPU.


On my RTX4090 1 Task of the Wus from 3.7.2024 longs about 440 sec 2 Tasks longs about 650 sec. At 1 Task the GPU Utilisation was abot 50-60% with 2 tasks it was about 98%
1 Stk 440-450 sec = 100%
2 Stk 610-640 sec = 142,8%
3 Stk 904-910 sec = 149%
4 Stk 1199-1202 sec = 149,8%

But now 2 tasks are 1,5 longer
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom 0.03 (nvidia_alpha) (Message 7787)
Posted 6 Jul 2024 by Sabroe_SMC
Post:
Hello guys
Are you foolish or what?
Last Wus are around 640 sec long (with 2 at the same time on my card) and now 50% longer and all for the same credits?!?!?!

5472493 4856710 6 Jul 2024, 18:03:47 UTC 6 Jul 2024, 18:20:17 UTC Fertig und Bestätigt 949.83 0.22 185.19 Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom v0.03 (nvidia_alpha)
windows_x86_64
5472501 4856718 6 Jul 2024, 18:03:47 UTC 6 Jul 2024, 18:20:17 UTC Fertig und Bestätigt 947.87 0.28 185.19 Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom v0.03 (nvidia_alpha)
windows_x86_64

5471202 4855760 3 Jul 2024, 18:11:11 UTC 4 Jul 2024, 10:04:13 UTC Fertig und Bestätigt 637.05 0.23 185.19 Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom v0.03 (nvidia_alpha)
windows_x86_64
5471237 4855816 3 Jul 2024, 18:10:37 UTC 4 Jul 2024, 10:04:13 UTC Fertig und Bestätigt 637.05 0.22 185.19 Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom v0.03 (nvidia_alpha)
windows_x86_64
4) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom (Message 7627)
Posted 15 Jun 2024 by Sabroe_SMC
Post:
15.06.2024 10:53:10 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
15.06.2024 10:53:10 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 10:53:12 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 10:53:12 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 10:53:12 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds
15.06.2024 10:53:47 | ralph@home | update requested by user
15.06.2024 10:53:47 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
15.06.2024 10:53:47 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 10:53:49 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 10:53:49 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 10:53:49 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds
15.06.2024 10:54:25 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
15.06.2024 10:54:25 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 10:54:27 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 10:54:27 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 10:54:27 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds
15.06.2024 11:08:08 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
15.06.2024 11:08:08 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 11:08:10 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 11:08:10 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 11:08:10 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds
15.06.2024 11:27:54 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
15.06.2024 11:27:54 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 11:27:55 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 11:27:55 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 11:27:55 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds
15.06.2024 11:32:10 | ralph@home | update requested by user
15.06.2024 11:32:13 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
15.06.2024 11:32:13 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 11:32:14 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 11:32:14 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 11:32:14 | ralph@home | This computer has finished a daily quota of 1 tasks
15.06.2024 11:32:14 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds
15.06.2024 11:32:49 | ralph@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
15.06.2024 11:32:49 | ralph@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
15.06.2024 11:32:51 | ralph@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
15.06.2024 11:32:51 | ralph@home | No tasks sent
15.06.2024 11:32:51 | ralph@home | This computer has finished a daily quota of 1 tasks
15.06.2024 11:32:51 | ralph@home | Project requested delay of 31 seconds

I updated Boinc manually at 11:32:10 to get new Wus but the result was that Ralph@home wont send me Wus for the rest of the day. Curios!
5) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom (Message 7539)
Posted 11 Jun 2024 by Sabroe_SMC
Post:
Same here:
<core_client_version>8.0.2</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Der Zugriffscode ist unzul?ssig.
(0xc) - exit code 12 (0xc)</message>
<stderr_txt>

CreateFile() error 32 when trying set file time
error: cannot delete old C:/DataBOINC/projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/cv1/rf2aa/models/ckpt.pt
Permission denied
error: cannot delete old C:/DataBOINC/projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/cv1/rf2aa/chemical.py
Permission denied
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:DataBOINCprojectsralph.bakerlab.orgcv1rf2aapredict.py", line 733, in <module>
with zipfile.ZipFile(args.z) as z:
File "C:DataBOINCprojectsralph.bakerlab.orgev0libzipfile.py", line 1268, in __init__
self._RealGetContents()
File "C:DataBOINCprojectsralph.bakerlab.orgev0libzipfile.py", line 1335, in _RealGetContents
raise BadZipFile("File is not a zip file")
zipfile.BadZipFile: File is not a zip file

</stderr_txt>
]]>
6) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom (Message 7523)
Posted 5 Jun 2024 by Sabroe_SMC
Post:
15 times the old and new sterr output

<core_client_version>8.0.2</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Der Zugriffscode ist unzul?ssig.
(0xc) - exit code 12 (0xc)</message>
<stderr_txt>
[venv_b_pred_alpha_193.zip]
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
the last disk(s) of this archive.
unzip: cannot find zipfile directory in venv_b_pred_alpha_193.zip,
and cannot find venv_b_pred_alpha_193.zip.zip, period.

</stderr_txt>
]]>

I think they dont did anything....






©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org