Posts by Transient

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : MiniRosetta Beta 3.41 (Message 5563)
Posted 24 Aug 2012 by Transient
Post:
I've scored a compute error with this one. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=2472325
bounds error (radius = 1.#QNAN, val = 1.#QNAN), def = SOGFUNC 16 7.527 2.956 0.006 7.527 4.173 0.002 7.621 2.956 0.005 11.681 3.513 0.008 11.812 3.39 0.011 11.812 3.513 0.003 12.941 4.215 0.001 12.941 4.058 0.011 13.636 3.513 0.001 14.372 3.513 0.004 14.47 3.39 0.004 14.655 4.151 0.002 14.89 3.513 0.009 14.914 3.513 0.003 14.936 3.513 0.003 18.3 7.3 0.009

ERROR: Fatal SOGFunc_Impl error.
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorescoringconstraintsSOGFunc_Impl.cc line: 181
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
called boinc_finish
2) Message boards : Feedback : Higher quorum (Message 5527)
Posted 14 Apr 2012 by Transient
Post:
I understand an actual quorum is not of real interest, but I thought the mechanism would allow for better testing of applications and WU batches.

It was just an idea :)
3) Message boards : Feedback : Higher quorum (Message 5525)
Posted 13 Apr 2012 by Transient
Post:
I thought tasks using the same starting point (same random seed) would produce the same result, provided the machines return the same number of models. But that's not true?
4) Message boards : Feedback : Higher quorum (Message 5522)
Posted 10 Apr 2012 by Transient
Post:
Since we're testing new batches of WU's and new applications here, does it make sense to institute a quorum, where multiple tasks have to validate aginst each other? Would that not make for a better test?






©2020 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org