Posts by rbpeake

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.30 and 5.31 and 5.32 (Message 2379) Posted 10 Oct 2006 by rbpeake Post: not an error as the w/u finished ok but did get this stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.11</core_client_version> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 2896098 # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 WARNING! error deleting file .aa1IGC.out WARNING! error deleting file .aa1IGC.out.bonds WARNING! error deleting file .aa1IGC.out.rot_templates ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures built 1 (nstruct) times This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts 0 starting pdbs were skipped ====================================================== I had the same issue. Result ID 288375 Name DOC_4HTC_u_pert_mcm_bbmin_1340_20_0 Workunit 254288 Created 10 Oct 2006 11:51:18 UTC Sent 10 Oct 2006 12:13:39 UTC Received 10 Oct 2006 16:10:29 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 250 Report deadline 14 Oct 2006 12:13:39 UTC CPU time 13897.25 stderr out <core_client_version>5.6.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # random seed: 2895533 # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 WARNING! error deleting file .aa4HTC.out WARNING! error deleting file .aa4HTC.out.bonds WARNING! error deleting file .aa4HTC.out.rot_templates ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures built 23 (nstruct) times This process generated 23 decoys from 23 attempts 0 starting pdbs were skipped ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Valid Claimed credit 47.6463856052397 Granted credit 50.3978804981935 application version 5.32
2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.30 and 5.31 and 5.32 (Message 2372) Posted 10 Oct 2006 by rbpeake Post: Result ID 286395 Name DOC_1WEJ_u_pert_mcm_bbmin_1338_8_0 Workunit 252472 Created 9 Oct 2006 22:58:45 UTC Sent 9 Oct 2006 23:06:02 UTC Received 10 Oct 2006 2:07:08 UTC Server state Over Outcome Validate error Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 2078 Report deadline 13 Oct 2006 23:06:02 UTC CPU time 5628.653606 stderr out <core_client_version>5.6.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # random seed: 2896945 # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200 WARNING! error deleting file .aa1WEJ.out WARNING! error deleting file .aa1WEJ.out.bonds WARNING! error deleting file .aa1WEJ.out.rot_templates ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures built 3 (nstruct) times This process generated 3 decoys from 4 attempts 0 starting pdbs were skipped ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 9.54912155099347 Granted credit 0 application version 5.31
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.14 (Message 1610) Posted 13 May 2006 by rbpeake Post: In case anyone missed this on the Rosetta board, here is an interesting thought on why the debugger code might have been causing the many page faults. Rosetta Post
4) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.13 (Message 1585) Posted 11 May 2006 by rbpeake Post: To answer sTrey's question, we're going to put the debugging code back in for the next ralph version (probably in two days) but make it optional -- I'll ask Rom (one of the Boinc developers) to post instructions for how to activate the messages. You may also want to make this optional in the future for Rosetta, too, so that those people who do encounter problems can activate the debugger. This may help to reduce their frustration because they are helping the developers to solve the problem. For the rest of Rosetta users with no problems, they can run the app without the debugger. Just my 2 cents!
5) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.11 and 5.12 (Message 1540) Posted 8 May 2006 by rbpeake Post: I've suggested that if a given application version proves valid, then go ahead and USE the results for the science, and then they could keep a small but steady stream of WUs on Ralph and allow debts to be worked down and make things run more normally... Make sense to me! Thanks for your reply, I will reign in my expectations (and my enthusiasm to some degree) and keep plugging away on Rosetta at the same time.
6) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.11 and 5.12 (Message 1538) Posted 8 May 2006 by rbpeake Post: It's a bit frustrating to sign back onto this project, to find there is no work available. Although I am continuing to crunch Rosetta@home, this lack of Ralph work perhaps gives the impression that Ralph already has enough testers. However, perhaps I am a bit too impatient, and your intent is to send out sufficient work to test your new applications, without creating unnecessary additional "make work" just to keep people busy. I certainly would not want to do "make work" when my resources could be spent elsewhere such as Rosetta@home doing necessary work. Thanks!
7) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.05 and higher (Message 1412) Posted 27 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: Meanwhile I've preferred to test with 16-hr runtimes, and I do run other projects.... So I'm wondering is there little value for testing longer time settings here? Easy enough to drop back to 2 or 4 hour runtimes. I wonder this, too. Maybe for each run, Rhiju, you could advise us testers what settings you would like us to use to achieve your goals for that particular run. In other words, what runtime setting would you like, would you also like us to run other projects at the same time, or just run Ralph by itself to get some results back really quickly, etc., etc. In this way we can more directly assist you in achieving your testing objectives. Thanks!
8) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.05 and higher (Message 1376) Posted 26 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: Really, we think this is the last one before Rosetta@home is updated! Hey, take as much time as you need! You are so close now, might as well wrap it up in style with a bulletproof application! :)
9) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.04 (Message 1356) Posted 25 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: For those jobs, we had it set to make a maximum of 10 predictions -- "hit it and quit it". That was mainly so that we'd have some results back quickly. I'm sending out more jobs now, asking for 50 predictions. I have my Preferences set to 8 hours, which I guess is OK if the workunit is set to report at a set time anyway. Or maybe you mean you have overwritten the time preferences, and if it takes longer than 8 hours to get 50 predictions, then that is what it will take? Might be prudent to make this clarification, so people don't get too stressed if their time preferences are ignored for now. :) Thanks!
10) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.04 (Message 1348) Posted 25 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: My one 5.04 wu, and one 5.03 wu for that matter, both finished successfully. However I'm wondering why they both finished in under 2 hours when my preference is set to 16 hours and earlier wu's did run for that time. wu 95168, 5.04 wu 94408, 5.03 Did you "Update" with BOINC Manager after changing your preferences on the web site? If not, the preferences will not be changed until the client contacts the server. Pardon me if this response is too obvious, but you never know.... :)
11) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Old - Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1278) Posted 20 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: I know the application has been upgraded to 5.01, but I got several failures on 5.00 of which the below are typical, in case there are of some use: 90320 90318 90185
12) Message boards : Current tests : [idea] - version release/log in this section (Message 1249) Posted 19 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: [color=darkred]RALPH version 5.01 has been release for Windows, Mac and Linux systems. It's nice they are working so quickly on improving the application. I have stopped work on the regular Rosetta@home and put all my resources on Ralph, so as to help come up with a reliable base application as soon as possible.
13) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Old - Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1207) Posted 17 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: My question is: When 5.00 windows will go to replace the buggy Rosetta 4.98 ? I have the same question. My experience with 5.00 shows it to be much better than 4.98, which shows an occasional bug now and then.
14) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1171) Posted 14 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: Looking at my first results, these workunits seem to have failed under 4.99, but so far they have ended successful on 5.00.
15) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1168) Posted 14 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: Well, so far under beta 5.0 beta, the HBLR_* and other WUs have completed successfully. So either the problem was nicked, at least for this comp, or well I'll increase the time setting in RALPH and see... Two hour timing works fine for me with 5.0 beta. So far so good. I think a lot of the problems showed up earlier in the previous calculations (where it got stuck), so the fact that I completed two hours with no issues seems to be a good omen. Btw, how do I set my right margin on these forums? My right margin is way off the screen to the right, and it never was like that before.
16) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1135) Posted 13 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: Here is one for me that got stuck at a little over 1%: 86442
17) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1116) Posted 13 Apr 2006 by rbpeake Post: Frozen at 1.404% Result ID 86007 Name TOP_SAMPLE_1ogw_365_2420_2 Workunit 66212
18) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 976) Posted 25 Mar 2006 by rbpeake Post: I do not know if this will help, but one of my units errored out: Result ID 50692 Name HB_BARCODE_30_1ten__354_40_0 Workunit 46237
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Resource share: RALPH instead of Rosetta@home? (Message 151) Posted 17 Feb 2006 by rbpeake Post: How should we do it? I run mostly Rosetta because that is the science research application, and put a lower resource share on Ralph. But it is a matter of personal preference of course. :)