Posts by Pieface

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta Beta 3.14 (Message 5387) Posted 9 Sep 2011 by Pieface Post: Pls check this one out... Ran for 21.5 ksec and looks like it finished fine after 901 decoys, but someone else had already sent in a bad one, so mine was marker as a 'validate error' ??? 2178636
2) Message boards : Current tests : Pretty big batch, what are we testing? (Message 5374) Posted 11 Aug 2011 by Pieface Post: This batch of Ralphies that started on Aug 9th is pretty good sized (seemingly endless), but I don't see any errors or code changes being posted... what are we testing??
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta Beta 3.14 (Message 5356) Posted 20 Jul 2011 by Pieface Post: Anyone having watchdog problems with the cleft.cyca.CYCA... units? I have three all gone past the 12hr target point and bouncing between 9:59 and 10:00 minutes remaining. Longest one is at about 13 hrs 25 mins. Going to let them run this morning to see if they finish on their own. edit: morning eyes, time for a shower, changed 'deft' to 'cleft'
4) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta Beta 3.14 (Message 5355) Posted 20 Jul 2011 by Pieface Post: Same error here 2077145 wingmans unit died also. ERROR: ct == final_atoms ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorescoringrms_util.cc line: 524 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish
5) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.99 (Message 4997) Posted 12 Nov 2009 by Pieface Post: Looks like things are back up and running now. I just got my last WU reported and d/l'd a mini 2.0
6) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.99 (Message 4995) Posted 12 Nov 2009 by Pieface Post: Been down over 24hrs with no word on what is going on... I keep getting - server error: cant attach shared memory whenever I try to report a finished WU.
7) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36 (Message 4256) Posted 9 Oct 2008 by Pieface Post: Second one ended same as the first; I was watching the graphics for a bit, and just before one of the re-starts I thought I saw a message go bye saying something about being in the same step for 5 mins with no progress.. is a 2ghz machine too slow for these guys? stderr this time: # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 failed to create shared mem segment CreateSemaphore failure! Cannot create semaphore! # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 Too many restarts with no progress. Keep application in memory while preempted. ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 5925.52 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== Wu output: Resid 1114065
8) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36 (Message 4254) Posted 9 Oct 2008 by Pieface Post: These guys are strange! I'm running win xp x64, with leave apps in memory. have three running simultaneously and getting re-start messages every 10 minutes or so. One just 'finished' according to boinc, but in the stderr I found: # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 failed to create shared mem segment CreateSemaphore failure! Cannot create semaphore! # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 Too many restarts with no progress. Keep application in memory while preempted. ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 1281.86 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== WU is: RESID 1114064
9) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.34 (Message 4214) Posted 25 Sep 2008 by Pieface Post: This one died with an Access Violation: 1098475 core_client_version>6.2.18</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400
10) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta v1.20 bug thread (Message 4029) Posted 16 May 2008 by Pieface Post: Looks like you haven't quite plugged up that leak/big file problem yet. Running with Boinc v5.10.45 on win xp x64, 24hr runtime preference, this one died after just short of 11 hours: 959541 same old 0xc0000005 with - Virtual Memory Usage - VirtualSize: 2127634432, PeakVirtualSize: 2127634432
11) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.96 (Message 4027) Posted 15 May 2008 by Pieface Post: A couple of winning 5.96 wu's, 24hr runtime with no spurious messages: 956480 and 956484
12) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.96 (Message 4021) Posted 14 May 2008 by Pieface Post: Got a bunch of v5.96 wu's going down with: 'ERROR:: Unable to determine sequence length from pdb file' and '</stderr_txt> <message> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>BAK1lcj_loop_model_dssp_it05_3696_4_1_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message' for example: 955147
13) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta v1.20 bug thread (Message 4020) Posted 13 May 2008 by Pieface Post: A couple of more 24hr ?successes? on my win xp x64 machine: 953525 and 953526 but both have a bunch of messages saying: 'can not open psipred_ss2 file tt'
14) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta v1.20 bug thread (Message 4017) Posted 11 May 2008 by Pieface Post: Much better; v1.20 went four for four on my dual quaddie with 24 hr run time preference. these are the first successes I have had since v1.17 came out! 952658 952659 952664 952670
15) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta v1.18 bug thread (Message 3988) Posted 4 May 2008 by Pieface Post: Have you folks got a wild loop-de-loop in there somewhere? this one ran 24hrs on my 2.8ghz p-4 win-xp machine and I think it never finished the first decoy!?! resid 945209
16) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta v 1.17 (Message 3981) Posted 3 May 2008 by Pieface Post: Sorry to report two failures overnite, running win x64 with 5.10.30 and 24hr preference. Both got about 75pct thru the time slot. details are: resid 943745 and resid 943746 Continues the string I had over on regular Rosie with long running wu's. -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005). I have several more v 1.17's running in various stages of completion, are they still worthwhile or should I dump them and go for v 1.18 ?
17) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.89 (Message 3534) Posted 13 Dec 2007 by Pieface Post: wowzers, takes a while to run these guys thru. I just finished my first, took almost six hours (21,240 secs)to do one decoy on my p-4 2.8ghz Win-xp box. I'm gonna have to up my preferences if they are all going to run this long! Resid 709016
18) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.88 (Message 3528) Posted 12 Dec 2007 by Pieface Post: Seems this one was too much for my 1.86ghz P-M machine: # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: 1771213 ******************************************************************** Rosetta score is stuck or going too long. Watchdog is ending the run! Stuck at score -46.3104 for 900 seconds ******************************************************************** GZIP SILENT FILE: .xx1zpy.out WU 708061
19) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.87 (Message 3520) Posted 11 Dec 2007 by Pieface Post: This one is kind of different: Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: 1776245 Can't seem to find a pairing inside database with aa1: g aa2: a edge1: W edge2: W orientation: P ERROR:: Exit from: .pose_rna_jumping.cc line: 457 wu 703300
20) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.84 (Message 3475) Posted 21 Nov 2007 by Pieface Post: Hmmm where did that last post go? spam filter is driving me nutso-bonzo. I had three die same as bigmike, 669839, 669973 and 669490. Also this one resultid=668956 that went down at hbonds.cc line: 641

Next 20