1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta mini beta and/or android 3.61-3.83 (Message 6164) Posted 6 Apr 2017 by Vikram K. Mulligan Post: Although these slow jobs take longer to find a solution, they are heavily biased to sampling regions of conformation space that these peptides can actually access and which are relevant to our interests. That is, we might make the sampling rate slower by a factor of 100, but we're perhaps 1,000 or 10,000 times more likely for any given sample to be "useful". We're crunching numbers more intensively to produce better results instead of just relying on more sampling. I can say that the jobs that we're running now are successfully sampling the native state with fewer samples in cases in which incredible amounts of the old, naïve sampling produced nothing near the native state. I'm not sure that we can make the sampling faster (i.e. produce more samples per CPU-hour), but the credit earned per sample should be proportional to the CPU-hours spent per sample, no?

2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta mini beta and/or android 3.61-3.83 (Message 5968) Posted 6 Jan 2016 by Vikram K. Mulligan Post: >Ok, new graphic is pretty but seems to be no "coherent". >1) All blue, included "accepted energy" box. Not an optimal solution, imho. >2) Blue only simulations boxes (searching, accepted, low energy) and return to >black for others boxes. Could you provide a screenshot? Also, what's your hardware and OS?

©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org