Posts by IceQueen41

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.23 (Message 1820)
Posted 12 Jun 2006 by IceQueen41
Post:
Not sure if this is a bug or not, but in the graphics for this WU, the protein simply isn't there, though everything else appears to be running properly. Also, I'm sure this has been mentioned (haven't been around much lately), but with most of the WU graphics, when opened a second (and then third, etc) time, the information at the bottom is shifted down so that the bottom line (the project URL & Accepted Energy) is not visible. Other than that, everything looks good so far.
2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.09 and 5.10 (Message 1516)
Posted 6 May 2006 by IceQueen41
Post:
The graphics bug hasn't quite been fixed yet (in 5.10). Although only one instance of the descriptive text shows up now, when opening the graphics interface a second (and third, and so on) time, there is an extra blank line between the two lines of text, pushing the rest of the WU info off the screen (model, step, time, percentage, etc), no matter how the window is resized.
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1093)
Posted 12 Apr 2006 by IceQueen41
Post:
I haven't had any 4.99 WU's work yet, and right now I've got one that's been going for nearly 10 hours and is still at 4.32% (but is still actually computing) -- WU result (although it doesn't have much to report as of yet). I'm not sure if it has reset itself at all, since it has been going overnight. Should I let it go or abort?

Edit: it has definitely been resetting itself in terms of model/steps (but not in time or percentage, which is odd...) The percentage seems to be increasing very slowly, as well.
4) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 738)
Posted 28 Feb 2006 by IceQueen41
Post:
Question: Should we set our run-time preference higher for these 4.90 WU's? Since they seem to be running slowly (due to debugging code maybe?) they aren't going to get much done in the recommended 2 hours. I have mine set at 4 hours for my P3 machines and even they aren't getting much done.



I don't think it's that it's not getting much done, it's that it only runs one trajectory, or model, and from what I've seen, the percentage updates primarily after a trajectory has finished. This would explain why it's on 1% until it's done.


How you doing IceQueen41, it's hard to tell what these v4.90 Wu's are doing, I have 1 Computer that has 1 Wu @ 5 hr's still showing 1% -- 1 Wu @ 2 hr's showing 47.95% & 1 Wu that finished @ 1 hr 11 min's never showing more than 1% ... Hard to figure them out when they run like that ... I have my Preferences set to run 2 hr's but these v4.90's don't seem to want to adhere to that Preference ... ???

PS: As I posted the above the WU that was @ 5 hr's finished @ 100% & Uploaded. Guess we just have to let them run their course & see what happens to them.



Hmm, so I guess that kills my theory... interesting. I've only run a couple... my prefs are set to 2 hours as well, and one ran about 1:45, and the other ran almost 6 hours. Hopefully this will get figured out soon...
5) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 734)
Posted 28 Feb 2006 by IceQueen41
Post:
Question: Should we set our run-time preference higher for these 4.90 WU's? Since they seem to be running slowly (due to debugging code maybe?) they aren't going to get much done in the recommended 2 hours. I have mine set at 4 hours for my P3 machines and even they aren't getting much done.



I don't think it's that it's not getting much done, it's that it only runs one trajectory, or model, and from what I've seen, the percentage updates primarily after a trajectory has finished. This would explain why it's on 1% until it's done.
6) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 717)
Posted 28 Feb 2006 by IceQueen41
Post:
I don't know how long it's supposed to spend "initializing", but I got a new 4.90 WU which has been initializing (at 1%, with the dots blinking) now for over 30 minutes. There is a molecule in the "native" box and one in the "searching" box, but the other boxes are empty. The lines defining the edges of the boxes are also oddly shaped, on the empty boxes the upper right corners are folded down and to the left.

This machine has "leave in memory" set to YES. I'll let it keep running, we'll see what happens.



Mine started the same way (WU, Result). It should get past the initialization sooner or later (mine took over 10 minutes on a decently fast processor), and then it only does one trajectory, which is why it appears to be stuck at 1% (mine was at 1% literally until it finished). It also seems to use a much slower algorithm with long intervals between steps, so don't restart or abort it until you know it's not going anywhere. Hope this helps!






©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org