Posts by BigMike

21) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.12 bug thread (Message 3911) Posted 16 Apr 2008 by BigMike Post: Will there be any more .pdb files, or has the debugging issue been fixed? ==Mike
22) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.95 (Message 3833) Posted 19 Mar 2008 by BigMike Post: This happened several days ago, but I just noticed it. Sorry about that. <core_client_version>5.10.44</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> trouble finding Rama_smooth_dyn.dat_ss_6.4 ERROR:: Exit from: .read_paths.cc line: 360 </stderr_txt> ]]> ==Mike
23) Message boards : Current tests : Help us debug minirosetta. (Message 3827) Posted 12 Mar 2008 by BigMike Post: When the new pdb symbols file like http://ralph.bakerlab.org/download/minirosetta_1.09_windows_intelx86.pdb will become available... Peter, The 1.09 version is available now...48MB! ==Mike
24) Message boards : Current tests : Help us debug minirosetta. (Message 3802) Posted 26 Feb 2008 by BigMike Post: Note how the name directly matches the application name, except for the file extension. Thanks. That's why I suspected I was using the wrong one. Sorry I missed the earlier post. ==Mike
25) Message boards : Current tests : Help us debug minirosetta. (Message 3799) Posted 26 Feb 2008 by BigMike Post: ... we ask that you download our application symbols file on windows platforms so that we can get debugging information. Does this symbols file still apply with Minirosetta 1.08? ==Mike
26) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta min 1.03 (Message 3642) Posted 17 Jan 2008 by BigMike Post: Yeow ... talk about ugly. I had to abort the two mini WU's I had (sorry) to keep everything from locking up. But I couldn't have done it without Barraud Denis's advice (thanks!): add in the <project> section of ralph and rosetta project after <send_job_log>0</send_job_log> the line <suspended_via_gui/> to stop the project And I guess some people don't understand that Alpha means Alpha: I have detached all 3 of my machines from the project as a result and will not reattach Too bad. However, it's nice to know we're a fairly competent group of people and can get around the occasional challenge! ==Mike
27) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for version 5.93 (Message 3629) Posted 16 Jan 2008 by BigMike Post: Wow ... that didn't take long... <core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 ERROR:: Unable to determine sequence length from pdb file ERROR:: Exit from: .pose.cc line: 1983 </stderr_txt> ]]>
28) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.90/5.91 (Message 3583) Posted 1 Jan 2008 by BigMike Post: I don't know if this is a bug or not: core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 # random seed: 1559807 No heartbeat from core client for 31 sec - exiting # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 # random seed: 1559807 WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 # random seed: 1559807 WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 # random seed: 1559807 WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 4759.66 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... ==Mike
29) Message boards : Current tests : test WUs (Message 3565) Posted 21 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: You can get a feel for it by checking the WUs in progress and successes last 24hrs on the homepage from day to day. Good point... ==Mike
30) Message boards : Current tests : test WUs (Message 3561) Posted 21 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: How many test WUs are generated? As with everything else having to do with computers, the answer is: It Depends. The number of WU's we get depends on what's being tested. If the developers are busy coding, we might not get any for a while. If they're testing a new feature, we'll get enough to test, then it will die off again. Then we'll get a few more, then nothing for a while. However, if they're stress testing before a release, or trying to figure out a particular bug, then there are plenty to go around. This project is for patient people who prefer quality over quantity. They need to be willing to go to the web site and examine the Results they return, and post any problems on the approriate thread. Not hard, but not the standard "crunch crunch crunch" scenario either. ==Mike
31) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.90/5.91 (Message 3560) Posted 21 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: This isn't really a bug, but more of an item that Rosetta@Home users will probably go nuts about. I suspect it has to do with the new BOINC API. Recent WU's have an interesting line that says ERRORS: CANCELLED. Any idea what it means? Might be useful to put it in the FAQs if it's always going to say that. ==Mike
32) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.89 (Message 3544) Posted 16 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: wowzers, takes a while to run these guys thru. I've seen this also. My preferences are set to 3600 seconds, and some of these are taking between 7000-9000 seconds to generate 1 decoy. ==Mike
33) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.89 (Message 3543) Posted 16 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: Is it just me, or is the Time To Completion acting strangely? It seems to get stuck when it says there are about 10 minutes left. Meanwhile the WU continues to run for another hour, then it all goes to 100% and it's done. It shouldn't have anything to do with my Result Duration Correction Factor, or CPU Effiency, because I've been doing this for a while and those were calculated a long time ago for this system. My impression is that it's a fairly recent phenomenon, maybe since 5.85 or so. Anyone else have thoughts about this? ==Mike
34) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.88 (Message 3530) Posted 12 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: Hmmm... another addressing crash. ==Mike
35) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.88 (Message 3529) Posted 12 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: I got the same thing. It doesn't seem to have anything to do with machine speed. ==Mike
36) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.87 (Message 3521) Posted 11 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: Just had a bunch of 5.87 WU's crash with addressing errors: 703156 703157 703158 703159 Lots of debug info in each of them. ==Mike
37) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.87 (Message 3518) Posted 11 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: I suspect the answer is no, but do you want us to abort WU's from a previous version (in this case 5.85) when a new version comes out? ==Mike
38) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.85 (Message 3516) Posted 10 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: Got the same crash as Dr. Who Fan and Pepo. ==Mike
39) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.84 (Message 3509) Posted 6 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: It seems version 5.85 now has its very own message thread See you over there... ==Mike
40) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.84 (Message 3508) Posted 6 Dec 2007 by BigMike Post: I definitely apologize for wasting your computational time on this... Not a problem as far as I am concerned. And thank you for explaining what's happening. It makes a difference to know someone is actually reading these posts. And I enjoy hearing about the nuts and bolts of Rosetta :) ==Mike

Previous 20 · Next 20