Posts by anders n
|
1)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
bug report for version 5.80
(Message 3401)
Posted 3 Oct 2007 by  anders n
Post: The "top7_wo_NatFra" seem to fail with <error_code>-161</error_code> Anders n |
|
2)
Message boards :
Current tests :
Testing - reporting discuss what and why.
(Message 3386)
Posted 23 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: I start with a reminder that English is not my native language so sometimes it can sound harsh but it's the best I can do for now. As a start I would like to know more about what the project get back from the Wu when a wu goes down(fails) . What more info do they need from us to know why it failed. Reporting back to us users from the projetct , how can it improve? Should we be discussing credit issues , like not sending wu of certain sort to comupters that do them slow(to get optimal performans to the project and the users). When there is a problem on Ralph that 1 or maybe 2 computers come up against how many computers on Rosetta will have the same troubel? Anders n |
|
3)
Message boards :
Current tests :
Testing - reporting discuss what and why.
(Message 3385)
Posted 23 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: Lets discuss how Ralph is working now, how YOU fell it should work and hopfully the staff will give there view as well. |
|
4)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
bug report for version 5.80
(Message 3384)
Posted 23 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: Me too. I didn't see this one run. 88,519 seconds. 14 decoys. Shouldn't it have received credit for the 14 successful decoys? (I personally care zero about credits, but it's been an issue brought up on Rosetta by many recently, so I'm wondering if that is another aspect of this that we should be debugging here on Ralph) This is something we need to discuss more, in my oppinion, so I'm starting a thread about it in "Current tests". Anders n |
|
5)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
bug report for version 5.80
(Message 3372)
Posted 17 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: <error_code>-161</error_code> I had 3 more and all ended with <error_code>-161</error_code> Anders n |
|
6)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
bug report for version 5.80
(Message 3370)
Posted 17 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: <error_code>-161</error_code> On 3 Wu-s so far. This,thisand this. Anders n |
|
7)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.78
(Message 3352)
Posted 7 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: MAC again I´m holding Ralph wu-s for now on my MAC. They all end like above. What do you want me to do? Anders n |
|
8)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.78
(Message 3348)
Posted 7 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: MAC again "Rosetta score is stuck or going too long. Watchdog is ending the run! Stuck at score -222.427 for 900 seconds" This Wu. Anders n |
|
9)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.78
(Message 3347)
Posted 7 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: <error_code>-161</error_code> On this Wu on a MAC Anders n |
|
10)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.78
(Message 3344)
Posted 6 Sep 2007 by anders n
Post: Hi all :) How about some work on Ralph to take some load off Rosetta when !? it come back to life;) Anders n |
|
11)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for rosetta_beta_5.77 and rosetta_5.69
(Message 3335)
Posted 30 Aug 2007 by anders n
Post: A restart of Boinc is the first thing to do when a Wu seems stuck. |
|
12)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3325)
Posted 17 Aug 2007 by anders n
Post: Error "Unable to determine sequence length from pdb file" on this MFR_ABRELAX_CONTROL Anders n |
|
13)
Message boards :
Current tests :
MAC memory Stack Size
(Message 3323)
Posted 15 Aug 2007 by anders n
Post: If anyone has problems with "Can't create shared memory: system shmat" on MAC try updating to Boinc 5.10.10. or higher, there is a fix in the .10 ver. Anders n |
|
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
NEW WORLD NUMBER ONE
(Message 3318)
Posted 12 Aug 2007 by anders n
Post: Keep up the good work Conan :) |
|
15)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3315)
Posted 11 Aug 2007 by anders n
Post: Here is one. Edit any info on the new apps? |
|
16)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3313)
Posted 9 Aug 2007 by anders n
Post: In this type of vu "157d__BOINC_MINIMIZE_NOFLAGS_RNA_ABINITIO-157d_-_2295_834_0" the steps, accepted energi and accepted RMSD does not change after about 5500 steps in each model. But you can se the grafics move and the new dots comming in the right corner. Anders n Edit I think that can lead to that the wu's error out on heartbeat for slow computers. |
|
17)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.71
(Message 3267)
Posted 7 Jul 2007 by anders n
Post: I have alot of - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) with this kind of wu-s Anders n |
|
18)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.69-5.70
(Message 3263)
Posted 2 Jul 2007 by anders n
Post: wu error - exit code 1 (0x1) I happend to be looking at grafics when it went wrong. It suddenly went to model 0 (maybe 1) step 0 and then exit. Anders n |
|
19)
Message boards :
Current tests :
MAC memory Stack Size
(Message 3259)
Posted 30 Jun 2007 by anders n
Post: On the result page of MAC WU-s there are this text. Rosetta@home Macintosh Stack Size checker. Original size: 8388608. Maximum size: 0. RLIM_INFINITY 67108864 I´m wondering if the tips on this site would help out to avoid stck size problems? http://www.spy-hill.net/help/apple/SharedMemory.html Is this something we should do? Anders n |
|
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Credits
(Message 3257)
Posted 30 Jun 2007 by anders n
Post: Is there a site where you can se which Boinc clients we are using here on Maybe have to write so more than me understands the question :) What I mean is how many wu´s is cruched by 5.8.15 or 5.10.7 or..... Anders n |
Next 20
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org