4.92 WU errors with \"incorrect function (0x1)\"

Author	Message
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0	Message 846 - Posted: 11 Mar 2006, 9:51:34 UTC Just got one of these WUs https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=15707 <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Unable to obtain sequence information. fasta file must be provided. Further looking at the WU shows the only other person who has tried to return anything on this WU, has also gotten a client error. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12658 15655 1679 11 Mar 2006 0:30:05 UTC 11 Mar 2006 1:36:46 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 --- 15707 1024 11 Mar 2006 1:37:15 UTC 11 Mar 2006 9:45:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 --- 16012 1454 11 Mar 2006 9:45:11 UTC 25 Mar 2006 9:45:11 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- --- ID: 846 · Reply Quote

KSMarksPsych Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 40 Credit: 8,226 RAC: 0	Message 848 - Posted: 11 Mar 2006, 13:00:23 UTC - in response to Message 846. Last modified: 11 Mar 2006, 13:01:10 UTC Just got one of these WUs https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=15707 <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Unable to obtain sequence information. fasta file must be provided. Further looking at the WU shows the only other person who has tried to return anything on this WU, has also gotten a client error. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12658 15655 1679 11 Mar 2006 0:30:05 UTC 11 Mar 2006 1:36:46 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 --- 15707 1024 11 Mar 2006 1:37:15 UTC 11 Mar 2006 9:45:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 --- 16012 1454 11 Mar 2006 9:45:11 UTC 25 Mar 2006 9:45:11 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- --- Got one too... This WU Kathryn :o) The BOINC FAQ Service The Unofficial BOINC Wiki The Trac System More BOINC information than you can shake a stick of RAM at. ID: 848 · Reply Quote

Robert Everly Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,333 RAC: 0	Message 851 - Posted: 11 Mar 2006, 14:32:36 UTC I had 4 results on two machines error out over night. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12722 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12678 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12676 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12727 These are relatively high WU numbers, so it could be a bad batch as opposed to 4.92 errors. I say that because I currently have three other WUs running 4.92 with no problems so far, but they are re-issues. They were not returned by the original host. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=9677 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=9678 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=9680 ID: 851 · Reply Quote

Robert Everly Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,333 RAC: 0	Message 863 - Posted: 12 Mar 2006, 19:06:25 UTC These three had the same error as well https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12677 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12827 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12829 I'm still betting that a bad batch went out. All seven (so far) of the recent failures have had a series of numbers at the start of the name. Like this: 7652_fullatom_relax_dec_7652_101.pdb_267_1 Not a single one of my seven have be done sucessfully by any other hosts so far. ID: 863 · Reply Quote