RALPH@home

Bug reports for Ralph 5.13

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.13

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Feb 14 06
Posts: 161
ID: 4
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 1569 - Posted 10 May 2006 22:52:33 UTC

    We\'ve received complaints from some (but not many) users that their machines are slowed down significantly -- internet connections have gone down, Windows Media Player starts up slowly -- with the apps from 5.10 to 5.12. We think its some debugging code that was introduced into 5.10; we have removed this code. Please post here if you continue to see slowdowns -- or if your slowdown problem has been cured with ralph 5.13!
    ____________

    Nuadormrac
    Avatar

    Joined: Feb 22 06
    Posts: 68
    ID: 699
    Credit: 2,739
    RAC: 0
    Message 1570 - Posted 10 May 2006 23:18:35 UTC

      So far, it\'s looking good. Actually, I had to do some fanagling to force WU downloads, as my resource share is 25, and had a lot of debt to other projects, but managed to grab some...

      Anyhow, I did some initial testing with what was running into severe performance probs, and not seeing it right now. I\'ve got some more things to do, so I\'ll let some other projects run while I\'m away (which should help balance the debt anyhow); and resume testing when I\'m back to push the computer some so as to get more testing with it under load.
      ____________

      LabRat
      Avatar

      Joined: Feb 22 06
      Posts: 1
      ID: 684
      Credit: 50,193
      RAC: 0
      Message 1572 - Posted 11 May 2006 0:49:26 UTC - in response to Message 1569.

        I just discovered that I had a slowdown problem with 5.12. I got one of the new 5.13 workunits and it appears that things are back to normal.

        [B^S] sTrey
        Avatar

        Joined: Feb 15 06
        Posts: 58
        ID: 36
        Credit: 15,430
        RAC: 0
        Message 1574 - Posted 11 May 2006 1:28:24 UTC

          Last modified: 11 May 2006 1:29:00 UTC

          5.13 has only been running 30 minutes here, but so far so good!
          I need to run things overnight with my normal project mix to be sure.

          Any short technical description on the debugging code removed? Or a pointer to it if it\'s public? I may beg for details to troubleshoot another app which handled this particularly badly; I don\'t think telling the vendor to run ralph/rosetta 5.12 is going to fly...
          ____________

          Rhiju
          Forum moderator
          Project developer
          Project scientist

          Joined: Feb 14 06
          Posts: 161
          ID: 4
          Credit: 3,725
          RAC: 0
          Message 1577 - Posted 11 May 2006 7:24:14 UTC - in response to Message 1570.

            Yes!!! Thanks much to sTrey, LabRat, and Son Goku for posting. I am going to go ahead and post the app to rosetta@home.

            To answer sTrey\'s question, we\'re going to put the debugging code back in for the next ralph version (probably in two days) but make it optional -- I\'ll ask Rom (one of the Boinc developers) to post instructions for how to activate the messages.

            So far, it\'s looking good. Actually, I had to do some fanagling to force WU downloads, as my resource share is 25, and had a lot of debt to other projects, but managed to grab some...

            Anyhow, I did some initial testing with what was running into severe performance probs, and not seeing it right now. I\'ve got some more things to do, so I\'ll let some other projects run while I\'m away (which should help balance the debt anyhow); and resume testing when I\'m back to push the computer some so as to get more testing with it under load.


            ____________

            [B^S] sTrey
            Avatar

            Joined: Feb 15 06
            Posts: 58
            ID: 36
            Credit: 15,430
            RAC: 0
            Message 1578 - Posted 11 May 2006 7:49:10 UTC

              Thank you Rhiju, for responding so fast when only a few people were complaining about this, and also to Rom for responding quickly and accurately on a fix/workaround. All is still going well on my pc.

              Profile [AF>France>Est>Lorraine]Le Zam
              Avatar

              Joined: Mar 2 06
              Posts: 9
              ID: 929
              Credit: 3,278
              RAC: 0
              Message 1579 - Posted 11 May 2006 7:59:15 UTC

                Hello, I had effectively slowings down and cuts of internet connection with the version 5.12.
                Now, it is always slow (40\' for 1,04 %).
                A big part of the graphic screen ( RMSD) is missing as the image shows (it).

                Ralph 5.13 TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom002_t283_507_7
                the same thing for hom003.
                I hope that it can help you.
                ____________

                wizzszz

                Joined: Apr 28 06
                Posts: 17
                ID: 1333
                Credit: 1,128
                RAC: 0
                Message 1580 - Posted 11 May 2006 8:28:55 UTC

                  I have seen problems with the screensaver just a seconde ago, can\'t post the screenshot here, will try to post it as soon as possible. For now, just the description: the Searching... and Accepted graphics seem to be broken from time to time, just showing a minimal part of the protein chain (maybe 4 or 5 segments only). This happened just a few times, for 2 or 3 seconds, as far as i know, will keep an eye on it...


                  JUMP_CLOSE_CHAINBREAK_ALLBARCODE_1q7sA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_506_41_0 using rosetta_beta version 513 (seen with model 2, windowed /windowed-maximized mode, didn\'t test it as real screensaver, but i guess it will be the same, for resizing doesn\'t affect it)

                  ____________

                  wizzszz

                  Joined: Apr 28 06
                  Posts: 17
                  ID: 1333
                  Credit: 1,128
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 1581 - Posted 11 May 2006 9:02:49 UTC

                    Last modified: 11 May 2006 9:21:40 UTC

                    Happened again with JUMP_CLOSE_CHAINBREAK_ALLBARCODE_1q7sA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_506_77_0 using rosetta_beta version 513

                    Not sure if it is a bug, or just zoom on the active chain part...

                    got 2 more screenshots now, images point to my dynamic IP, will keep them available as long as possible!






                    ____________

                    wizzszz

                    Joined: Apr 28 06
                    Posts: 17
                    ID: 1333
                    Credit: 1,128
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 1582 - Posted 11 May 2006 9:41:58 UTC

                      Those three pics are taken within a few seconds and belong to the same model and same WU! And I noticed another problem: The pictures do not really show it, but the graphic sometimes displays a huge gap where the protein chain should obviously be connected!!! Don\'t know if this is a display bug only, or if it affects the correct setup of the chain!




                      ____________

                      [B^S] sTrey
                      Avatar

                      Joined: Feb 15 06
                      Posts: 58
                      ID: 36
                      Credit: 15,430
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 1583 - Posted 11 May 2006 10:00:09 UTC

                        Last modified: 11 May 2006 10:04:10 UTC

                        I\'m seeing the same thing in the graphics, the display alternates between normal appearance and partial chains as shown by wizzszz\'s pics.

                        However I much prefer this to the problems 5.12 was causing...

                        wizzszz

                        Joined: Apr 28 06
                        Posts: 17
                        ID: 1333
                        Credit: 1,128
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 1584 - Posted 11 May 2006 10:06:21 UTC

                          Last modified: 11 May 2006 10:15:51 UTC

                          Me again :)!

                          Watched the last WU (as in the pics below) displaying about 41%, Model 3
                          calculating far more than 1,000,000 steps, then it finished and uploaded w/o starting another Model (credits granted, so i think no error was reported)

                          And in the last minute of calculating, the display seemed to be stuck over and over again (each time for a second or so) where \"Searching...\" should change more fluently, while steps counter increased normally!

                          Any other RALPH model had about 400,000 steps, so I wonder if this is wanted behaviour...
                          ____________

                          rbpeake

                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                          Posts: 19
                          ID: 218
                          Credit: 3,370
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 1585 - Posted 11 May 2006 11:59:03 UTC - in response to Message 1577.

                            To answer sTrey\'s question, we\'re going to put the debugging code back in for the next ralph version (probably in two days) but make it optional -- I\'ll ask Rom (one of the Boinc developers) to post instructions for how to activate the messages.

                            You may also want to make this optional in the future for Rosetta, too, so that those people who do encounter problems can activate the debugger. This may help to reduce their frustration because they are helping the developers to solve the problem. For the rest of Rosetta users with no problems, they can run the app without the debugger. Just my 2 cents!

                            ____________

                            Nuadormrac
                            Avatar

                            Joined: Feb 22 06
                            Posts: 68
                            ID: 699
                            Credit: 2,739
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 1586 - Posted 11 May 2006 12:17:24 UTC

                              There\'s also when the apps are released to other scientific projects... If the app is worked out by then, they might not want to take the time to run debugging (which is more important during the apps development process)... But who knows, and that will be between the respective scientists to discuss/decide among themselves...

                              If it\'s optimal enough, that it isn\'t like it\'s seizing the computer on one however, it won\'t matter so much for the user. It\'s when it becomes difficult to do anything else that issues start to arrise.

                              Anyhow, I went on, with both downloading/uploading some torrents, and catching up on some episodes of Lost I hadn\'t seen previously. I let RALPH run while doing all that, and all still seemed well...
                              ____________

                              Profile [AF>France>Est>Lorraine]Le Zam
                              Avatar

                              Joined: Mar 2 06
                              Posts: 9
                              ID: 929
                              Credit: 3,278
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 1587 - Posted 11 May 2006 12:59:41 UTC

                                Last modified: 11 May 2006 12:59:57 UTC

                                Hello again,
                                This Wu\'s are blocked to 1.04 % during 42 or 50 minutes then pass in 100 %. I do not believe that it is normal !
                                TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom002_t283__507_30_0_0
                                TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom003_t283__507_30_0_0
                                TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom003_t283__507_27_0
                                TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom005_t283__507_43_0_0

                                ____________

                                Moderator9
                                Forum moderator

                                Joined: Feb 16 06
                                Posts: 251
                                ID: 210
                                Credit: 0
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 1588 - Posted 11 May 2006 13:35:13 UTC - in response to Message 1587.

                                  Last modified: 11 May 2006 13:40:01 UTC

                                  Hello again,
                                  This Wu\'s are blocked to 1.04 % during 42 or 50 minutes then pass in 100 %. I do not believe that it is normal !
                                  TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom002_t283__507_30_0_0
                                  TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom003_t283__507_30_0_0
                                  TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom003_t283__507_27_0
                                  TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom005_t283__507_43_0_0


                                  This is normal behavior if you have your time setting at one hour. It is also possible if you have your time setting set to default settings, that the project has set these test Work Units for a 1 hour turn around time to speed the testing results.

                                  If any of the above is the case. The Work Unit will only process 1 model. It will only show 1.xx% until that model finishes and then it will jump to 100% and report. So what you are seeing is normal.

                                  See this thread for more information.

                                  ____________
                                  Moderator9
                                  RALPH@home FAQs
                                  RALPH@home Guidelines
                                  Moderator Contact

                                  Moderator9
                                  Forum moderator

                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                  Posts: 251
                                  ID: 210
                                  Credit: 0
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 1589 - Posted 11 May 2006 13:42:47 UTC - in response to Message 1582.

                                    Those three pics are taken within a few seconds and belong to the same model and same WU! And I noticed another problem: The pictures do not really show it, but the graphic sometimes displays a huge gap where the protein chain should obviously be connected!!! Don\'t know if this is a display bug only, or if it affects the correct setup of the chain!


                                    In some cases the chains will appear to be broken because this is part of a new approach to building the model. In some of your images most of the model is not displayed at all and that is not correct, but if the entire amino acid chain is displayed but it is broken in a number of places that would be normal.

                                    ____________
                                    Moderator9
                                    RALPH@home FAQs
                                    RALPH@home Guidelines
                                    Moderator Contact

                                    BennyRop

                                    Joined: Mar 11 06
                                    Posts: 14
                                    ID: 1067
                                    Credit: 674
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 1592 - Posted 11 May 2006 18:04:34 UTC

                                      When I managed to get Ralph 5.13 to be the only project in memory, my problem with slow response on right clicking on an .avi file and having the menu pop up in 6-15 seconds disappeared. It only took the 2 seconds (first time) and under 1 second the second time.

                                      Which is good news.. however..

                                      I ran Rosetta at 100% (1 project); and have the \"leave the app in memory when pre-empted\" setting checked. To get Ralph 5.13 to be the only app in memory, I had to suspend everything, reboot, and then unsuspend Ralph 5.13. With both apps unsuspended, they were both in memory. and the slow response problem returned.

                                      When I switched Boinc to not \"leave the app in memory when pre-empted\" and ran the update I noticed the apps running for a few minutes, then switching, and when I looked back at them, they\'d lost whatever cpu time they\'d gained.. and moved on to a new WU.

                                      \"leave app in memory when pre-empted\" is checked again.. the project is updated, and the cpu time continued to increase for whichever app was currently being run. The slow response problem is still here (at least for right clicking on .avi files), in spite of the fact that updating was supposed to allow us an update of the Boinc API - if I read the announcements on Rosetta properly last night. Before I could report my findings last night, I gave up, and opened up Cineplayer to play a dvd. (Cineplayer doesn\'t seem affected.. :) )
                                      ____________

                                      Rhiju
                                      Forum moderator
                                      Project developer
                                      Project scientist

                                      Joined: Feb 14 06
                                      Posts: 161
                                      ID: 4
                                      Credit: 3,725
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 1595 - Posted 12 May 2006 18:51:22 UTC - in response to Message 1592.

                                        Benny: thanks for posting. I think the remaining issues on your app are probably going to happen any time you run both ralph and r@h; some clients don\'t seem to be juggling the memory well. I\'m running ralph, r@h, and seti@home, and leaving in memory -- but I\'ve got a Mac, which may handle virtual memory differently than a PC.

                                        The good news is that we\'re continuing to cut down the memory use of Rosetta; at this point we\'re approaching the memory requirements of seti!

                                        One thing you may want to try is to leave graphics off for ralph, rosetta, or both. We\'ve noticed that once you turn on graphics, a large amount of virtual memory is allocated to the program -- and it doesn\'t get deallocated if you close the graphics window. The same things happen with SETI@home. We\'re in touch with the BOINC team in an effort to figure out what\'s going on.

                                        When I managed to get Ralph 5.13 to be the only project in memory, my problem with slow response on right clicking on an .avi file and having the menu pop up in 6-15 seconds disappeared. It only took the 2 seconds (first time) and under 1 second the second time.

                                        Which is good news.. however..

                                        I ran Rosetta at 100% (1 project); and have the \"leave the app in memory when pre-empted\" setting checked. To get Ralph 5.13 to be the only app in memory, I had to suspend everything, reboot, and then unsuspend Ralph 5.13. With both apps unsuspended, they were both in memory. and the slow response problem returned.

                                        When I switched Boinc to not \"leave the app in memory when pre-empted\" and ran the update I noticed the apps running for a few minutes, then switching, and when I looked back at them, they\'d lost whatever cpu time they\'d gained.. and moved on to a new WU.

                                        \"leave app in memory when pre-empted\" is checked again.. the project is updated, and the cpu time continued to increase for whichever app was currently being run. The slow response problem is still here (at least for right clicking on .avi files), in spite of the fact that updating was supposed to allow us an update of the Boinc API - if I read the announcements on Rosetta properly last night. Before I could report my findings last night, I gave up, and opened up Cineplayer to play a dvd. (Cineplayer doesn\'t seem affected.. :) )


                                        ____________

                                        Profile Astro

                                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                                        Posts: 141
                                        ID: 48
                                        Credit: 32,977
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 1597 - Posted 12 May 2006 19:23:35 UTC

                                          Last modified: 12 May 2006 19:25:33 UTC

                                          This 5.13 failed while screensaver running and I was away. WU 97133 TEST_HOMOLOG_ABRELAX_hom002_t287__508_87

                                          <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                          <message>
                                          - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
                                          </message>
                                          <stderr_txt>
                                          # random seed: 3071457
                                          # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400

                                          Profile Astro

                                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                                          Posts: 141
                                          ID: 48
                                          Credit: 32,977
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 1602 - Posted 12 May 2006 23:05:03 UTC

                                            This is NOT a double post
                                            This 5.13 failed while screensaver was running and I was away. WU 93568 JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_486_26

                                            <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                            <message>
                                            - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
                                            </message>
                                            <stderr_txt>
                                            # random seed: 3075433
                                            # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400

                                            </stderr_txt>

                                            Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.13


                                            Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                            Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                            Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                            Back to top ^