RALPH@home

Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Feb 14 06
Posts: 161
ID: 4
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 1705 - Posted 29 May 2006 0:13:35 UTC

    Last modified: 30 May 2006 5:57:39 UTC

    Ralph 5.17 has potential fixes for some glitches in 5.16:

    1. Apps that can\'t find the appropriate libraries to display graphics (for whatver reason) will now not display graphics! Hopefully, this will help with some of the rare cases where graphics is triggering errors.

    2. We have put in a symbol store to give us more debugging information. Thanks, Rom!

    3. We removed the print statements to stdout.txt that were filling up some users\'s disks for a particular kind of workunit.

    Some of the graphics issues associated with the t283_lowHB_LOOPRELAX_hand_aligned_hom... workunits are still there, but we\'re working on it!
    ____________

    Rhiju
    Forum moderator
    Project developer
    Project scientist

    Joined: Feb 14 06
    Posts: 161
    ID: 4
    Credit: 3,725
    RAC: 0
    Message 1707 - Posted 29 May 2006 4:10:18 UTC

      Ralph 5.18 is the same executable as Ralph 5.17.
      Now the \"PDB\" file has been updated properly to give us more debugging
      info; its downloaded by the client in case of error and
      gives us more useful feedback as to where and why the error occurred!
      ____________

      ruevoss

      Joined: May 24 06
      Posts: 3
      ID: 1430
      Credit: 919
      RAC: 0
      Message 1708 - Posted 29 May 2006 9:26:21 UTC

        5.18 does not save results on disk despite settings ;((
        mac os x 10.4.6
        ____________

        Rhiju
        Forum moderator
        Project developer
        Project scientist

        Joined: Feb 14 06
        Posts: 161
        ID: 4
        Credit: 3,725
        RAC: 0
        Message 1712 - Posted 29 May 2006 20:40:39 UTC - in response to Message 1708.

          Ruevoss, that\'s odd. I saw that you aborted a bunch of ralph WUs -- is that because they were hanging? Can you post what error message you got? Thanks!

          Is anyone else having problems with 5.18 and Mac?

          I\'m crunching a WU on my Mac now, so I\'ll pay careful attention.

          5.18 does not save results on disk despite settings ;((
          mac os x 10.4.6


          ____________

          Rhiju
          Forum moderator
          Project developer
          Project scientist

          Joined: Feb 14 06
          Posts: 161
          ID: 4
          Credit: 3,725
          RAC: 0
          Message 1714 - Posted 30 May 2006 4:00:44 UTC - in response to Message 1712.

            I didn\'t have any problem with my WU, but I\'m running Mac OS 10.4.2. Anyone having trouble with the new ralph and Mac OS 10.4.9?

            Ruevoss, that\'s odd. I saw that you aborted a bunch of ralph WUs -- is that because they were hanging? Can you post what error message you got? Thanks!

            Is anyone else having problems with 5.18 and Mac?

            I\'m crunching a WU on my Mac now, so I\'ll pay careful attention.

            5.18 does not save results on disk despite settings ;((
            mac os x 10.4.6



            ____________

            ruevoss

            Joined: May 24 06
            Posts: 3
            ID: 1430
            Credit: 919
            RAC: 0
            Message 1715 - Posted 30 May 2006 5:31:53 UTC

              >Ruevoss, that\'s odd. I saw that you aborted a bunch of ralph WUs -- is that because they were hanging?
              exactly ...
              >Can you post what error message you got? Thanks!
              okay, next time i\'am crunching and they\'ll blow it, I send the message. I hardly do remember saying \"result to nil ...\" or so. but .....
              ____________

              Honza

              Joined: Feb 16 06
              Posts: 9
              ID: 147
              Credit: 1,962
              RAC: 0
              Message 1716 - Posted 30 May 2006 7:08:08 UTC

                Now really a bug, Rhiju, but we are empty, dry, no more WUs to test 5.19...
                ____________

                ruevoss

                Joined: May 24 06
                Posts: 3
                ID: 1430
                Credit: 919
                RAC: 0
                Message 1717 - Posted 30 May 2006 15:36:15 UTC

                  Here\'s the required Message:

                  \"Message:
                  rosetta_beta not responding to screensaver, exiting
                  Task t283_lowHB_FARELAX_S_00001_0000040_0_583_2_1 exited with zero status but no \'fi.
                  if this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project
                  Rescheduling CPU: application exited\"

                  and i can not copy the messages from boinc manager on my mac ;((
                  had to type it!
                  ____________

                  Mike Gelvin
                  Avatar

                  Joined: Feb 17 06
                  Posts: 50
                  ID: 468
                  Credit: 55,397
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 1718 - Posted 30 May 2006 18:52:05 UTC

                    Last modified: 30 May 2006 18:55:44 UTC

                    Had an occasion where a work unit was showing at the end 100% complete but was not using any CPU time. I investigated and indeed the Idle Task was running at 99%+ while the 5.19 work unit was apparently idle. This lasted for at least 2 minutes, but might have been up to 2 hours before I saw it as that\'s how much time the Idle task has accumulated. Without intervention, the work unit completed and was reported normally. Not sure what this means, I\'ll keep an eye out for a similar occurrence.


                    As I was typing this, another work unit has gotten into this mode. Showing 100% complete and not using any CPU time.

                    ____________

                    Mike Gelvin
                    Avatar

                    Joined: Feb 17 06
                    Posts: 50
                    ID: 468
                    Credit: 55,397
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 1719 - Posted 30 May 2006 19:15:34 UTC - in response to Message 1718.

                      Had an occasion where a work unit was showing at the end 100% complete but was not using any CPU time. I investigated and indeed the Idle Task was running at 99%+ while the 5.19 work unit was apparently idle. This lasted for at least 2 minutes, but might have been up to 2 hours before I saw it as that\'s how much time the Idle task has accumulated. Without intervention, the work unit completed and was reported normally. Not sure what this means, I\'ll keep an eye out for a similar occurrence.


                      As I was typing this, another work unit has gotten into this mode. Showing 100% complete and not using any CPU time.


                      It completed after being dormant for 18 minutes. I\'ll watch for another.

                      ____________

                      Mike Gelvin
                      Avatar

                      Joined: Feb 17 06
                      Posts: 50
                      ID: 468
                      Credit: 55,397
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 1720 - Posted 30 May 2006 20:15:36 UTC - in response to Message 1719.

                        Had an occasion where a work unit was showing at the end 100% complete but was not using any CPU time. I investigated and indeed the Idle Task was running at 99%+ while the 5.19 work unit was apparently idle. This lasted for at least 2 minutes, but might have been up to 2 hours before I saw it as that\'s how much time the Idle task has accumulated. Without intervention, the work unit completed and was reported normally. Not sure what this means, I\'ll keep an eye out for a similar occurrence.


                        As I was typing this, another work unit has gotten into this mode. Showing 100% complete and not using any CPU time.


                        It completed after being dormant for 18 minutes. I\'ll watch for another.


                        The very next work unit also showed 100% with no CPU time after about 40 minutes of run time. It stayed dormant for 20 minutes, then completed and reported.
                        ____________

                        Mike Gelvin
                        Avatar

                        Joined: Feb 17 06
                        Posts: 50
                        ID: 468
                        Credit: 55,397
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 1721 - Posted 30 May 2006 23:55:20 UTC - in response to Message 1720.

                          Had an occasion where a work unit was showing at the end 100% complete but was not using any CPU time. I investigated and indeed the Idle Task was running at 99%+ while the 5.19 work unit was apparently idle. This lasted for at least 2 minutes, but might have been up to 2 hours before I saw it as that\'s how much time the Idle task has accumulated. Without intervention, the work unit completed and was reported normally. Not sure what this means, I\'ll keep an eye out for a similar occurrence.


                          As I was typing this, another work unit has gotten into this mode. Showing 100% complete and not using any CPU time.


                          It completed after being dormant for 18 minutes. I\'ll watch for another.


                          The very next work unit also showed 100% with no CPU time after about 40 minutes of run time. It stayed dormant for 20 minutes, then completed and reported.


                          For the next two work units. Run 35 minutes, dormant for 24. Run 51 minutes, dormant for 9.

                          The pattern seems to be that the work unit will go dormant after completion until one full hour has elapsed.

                          Note: this is in the account file for Ralph: <cpu_run_time>0</cpu_run_time>


                          ____________

                          Mike Gelvin
                          Avatar

                          Joined: Feb 17 06
                          Posts: 50
                          ID: 468
                          Credit: 55,397
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 1722 - Posted 31 May 2006 5:16:29 UTC - in response to Message 1721.

                            Had an occasion where a work unit was showing at the end 100% complete but was not using any CPU time. I investigated and indeed the Idle Task was running at 99%+ while the 5.19 work unit was apparently idle. This lasted for at least 2 minutes, but might have been up to 2 hours before I saw it as that\'s how much time the Idle task has accumulated. Without intervention, the work unit completed and was reported normally. Not sure what this means, I\'ll keep an eye out for a similar occurrence.


                            As I was typing this, another work unit has gotten into this mode. Showing 100% complete and not using any CPU time.


                            It completed after being dormant for 18 minutes. I\'ll watch for another.


                            The very next work unit also showed 100% with no CPU time after about 40 minutes of run time. It stayed dormant for 20 minutes, then completed and reported.


                            For the next two work units. Run 35 minutes, dormant for 24. Run 51 minutes, dormant for 9.

                            The pattern seems to be that the work unit will go dormant after completion until one full hour has elapsed.

                            Note: this is in the account file for Ralph: <cpu_run_time>0</cpu_run_time>



                            This time I had a work unit that ran for 59 min 35 seconds... then went dormant for 60 min 25 seconds. Total was 2 hrs instead of 1.

                            ____________

                            [B^S] suguruhirahara

                            Joined: Mar 5 06
                            Posts: 40
                            ID: 992
                            Credit: 6,001
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 1723 - Posted 31 May 2006 9:53:31 UTC - in response to Message 1722.

                              Last modified: 31 May 2006 10:01:56 UTC

                              This version works without problems on x64.

                              Work tasks : OK
                              Graphics : OK

                              This time I had a work unit that ran for 59 min 35 seconds... then went dormant for 60 min 25 seconds. Total was 2 hrs instead of 1.

                              Are your workunits CASP7? If so, it\'s natural to delay to finish.
                              Moderator9 has mentioned in the post, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=209#1654
                              d287__CASP7_ABRELAX_521_7

                              has been running for 6 hours and shows only 1.044% progress. This is running on a Mac.


                              Let it run. It is a test Work Unit for CASP7. It is probably just a large Work Unit. Do not be surprised if it suddenly jumps to 100% at the end of the first model. Do not stop Boinc Or Rosetta or it will start over at 0%.

                              If it gets to the place where is has run longer that about 5 times the setting for \"Time\" in your preferences, it will either be stopped by the \"Watchdog\" or you might want to consider aborting it manually at that time.

                              Keep us posted.


                              If your units aren\'t CASP7 ones, it might be an error, I think.
                              ____________

                              Mike Gelvin
                              Avatar

                              Joined: Feb 17 06
                              Posts: 50
                              ID: 468
                              Credit: 55,397
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 1724 - Posted 31 May 2006 14:35:36 UTC - in response to Message 1723.

                                Last modified: 31 May 2006 14:38:26 UTC

                                This version works without problems on x64.

                                Work tasks : OK
                                Graphics : OK
                                This time I had a work unit that ran for 59 min 35 seconds... then went dormant for 60 min 25 seconds. Total was 2 hrs instead of 1.

                                Are your workunits CASP7? If so, it\'s natural to delay to finish.


                                Whole different issue, my CPU utilization dropped to 0. In this specific case, it remained at 0 for 60 min 25 sec. This is a waste of CPU cycles.
                                All work units are CASP7 as far as I know.

                                Moderator9 has mentioned in the post, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=209#1654
                                d287__CASP7_ABRELAX_521_7

                                has been running for 6 hours and shows only 1.044% progress. This is running on a Mac.


                                Let it run. It is a test Work Unit for CASP7. It is probably just a large Work Unit. Do not be surprised if it suddenly jumps to 100% at the end of the first model. Do not stop Boinc Or Rosetta or it will start over at 0%.

                                If it gets to the place where is has run longer that about 5 times the setting for \"Time\" in your preferences, it will either be stopped by the \"Watchdog\" or you might want to consider aborting it manually at that time.

                                Keep us posted.


                                If your units aren\'t CASP7 ones, it might be an error, I think.


                                ____________

                                retsof

                                Joined: May 28 06
                                Posts: 1
                                ID: 1441
                                Credit: 640
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 1725 - Posted 31 May 2006 21:45:55 UTC

                                  I must be missing something. Others are processing work and finding bugs. All I have seen for a few days is \"No work from project\"
                                  ____________

                                  TCU Computer Science

                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                  Posts: 5
                                  ID: 330
                                  Credit: 241,166
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 1726 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 5:08:02 UTC

                                    rosetta_beta version 518
                                    WU Name: JUMP_RELAX_3142__t285__SAVE_ALL_OUT_594_22_0
                                    running on Mac OS 10.4.6

                                    BOINC Manager Tasks tab shows CPU Time stuck at 08:53:24 and 70%
                                    top command shows TIME = 36:04:48 and climbing

                                    stopped and restarted BOINC
                                    CPU Time reverted to 05:35:00 and 70% but no longer stuck

                                    [B^S] suguruhirahara

                                    Joined: Mar 5 06
                                    Posts: 40
                                    ID: 992
                                    Credit: 6,001
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 1727 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 6:35:23 UTC - in response to Message 1725.

                                      Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 6:36:53 UTC

                                      I must be missing something. Others are processing work and finding bugs. All I have seen for a few days is \"No work from project\"

                                      You request workunits untimely. Because this alpha project sends workunits out in the limited number to check them for bugs, if developers don\'t want to send units out, it means that they\'re satisfied with them and there\'s no need to send and check anymore. So you can\'t get works.

                                      Those who are processing works now are who have requested and fetched works already.
                                      ____________

                                      [B^S] suguruhirahara

                                      Joined: Mar 5 06
                                      Posts: 40
                                      ID: 992
                                      Credit: 6,001
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 1728 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 9:14:51 UTC

                                        Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 9:17:39 UTC

                                        While a progress of an unit reached 100% on my BOINC client, strangely it continues to work, and % of completed on the graphic keeps less than 100%, approximately 57%.
                                        (here you can see a screen shot of it.) And I continue to work on the unit several minutes, but it remains at the same percentage.

                                        Is this bug or not? thanks,


                                        ____________

                                        [B^S] suguruhirahara

                                        Joined: Mar 5 06
                                        Posts: 40
                                        ID: 992
                                        Credit: 6,001
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 1729 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 9:20:11 UTC - in response to Message 1728.

                                          While a progress of an unit reached 100% on my BOINC client, strangely it continues to work, and % of completed on the graphic keeps less than 100%, approximately 57%.
                                          (here you can see a screen shot of it.) And I continue to work on the unit several minutes, but it remains at the same percentage.
                                          This problem are solved. sorry for embarassment.

                                          tralala

                                          Joined: Apr 12 06
                                          Posts: 52
                                          ID: 1266
                                          Credit: 15,257
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 1730 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 9:37:57 UTC - in response to Message 1728.

                                            Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 9:52:19 UTC

                                            While a progress of an unit reached 100% on my BOINC client, strangely it continues to work, and % of completed on the graphic keeps less than 100%, approximately 57%.
                                            (here you can see a screen shot of it.) And I continue to work on the unit several minutes, but it remains at the same percentage.

                                            Is this bug or not? thanks,



                                            I think this is related to the phenomenon Mike Gelvin was reporting that some WU remain dormant after showing 100%. Perhaps you can check the task manager for the next WU.

                                            ____________

                                            tralala

                                            Joined: Apr 12 06
                                            Posts: 52
                                            ID: 1266
                                            Credit: 15,257
                                            RAC: 0
                                            Message 1731 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 9:38:59 UTC - in response to Message 1730.

                                              Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 9:54:58 UTC

                                              Instant failure, no graphics displayed but two preempted WU from Rosetta in mem:
                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145667

                                              Have two more of those WU, will watch them closely.

                                              How can I turn debug-information on?

                                              ____________

                                              tralala

                                              Joined: Apr 12 06
                                              Posts: 52
                                              ID: 1266
                                              Credit: 15,257
                                              RAC: 0
                                              Message 1732 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 10:53:43 UTC - in response to Message 1731.

                                                Instant failure, no graphics displayed but two preempted WU from Rosetta in mem:
                                                http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145667

                                                Have two more of those WU, will watch them closely.

                                                How can I turn debug-information on?


                                                The next two WUs failed as well with the same error code after the same time (6sec):

                                                http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145641
                                                http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145639

                                                ____________

                                                tralala

                                                Joined: Apr 12 06
                                                Posts: 52
                                                ID: 1266
                                                Credit: 15,257
                                                RAC: 0
                                                Message 1733 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 11:03:50 UTC - in response to Message 1730.

                                                  While a progress of an unit reached 100% on my BOINC client, strangely it continues to work, and % of completed on the graphic keeps less than 100%, approximately 57%.
                                                  (here you can see a screen shot of it.) And I continue to work on the unit several minutes, but it remains at the same percentage.

                                                  Is this bug or not? thanks,



                                                  I think this is related to the phenomenon Mike Gelvin was reporting that some WU remain dormant after showing 100%. Perhaps you can check the task manager for the next WU.


                                                  I can confirm this bug reported from suguruhirahara and Mike Gelvin. This WU:
                                                  http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145529

                                                  finished after 54 minutes and BOINC reported 100% but still running and in the task manager 0% CPU-ulilization was reported. This lasted for about 5 minutes until it finished. I checked the screensaver and the progress was 89% and it was shown that it had started a 4th model but which in fact seemed not to be calculated. Here is the screenshot
                                                  ____________

                                                  [B^S] suguruhirahara

                                                  Joined: Mar 5 06
                                                  Posts: 40
                                                  ID: 992
                                                  Credit: 6,001
                                                  RAC: 0
                                                  Message 1734 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 11:12:10 UTC - in response to Message 1732.

                                                    Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 11:12:53 UTC

                                                    Instant failure, no graphics displayed but two preempted WU from Rosetta in mem:
                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145667

                                                    Have two more of those WU, will watch them closely.

                                                    How can I turn debug-information on?


                                                    The next two WUs failed as well with the same error code after the same time (6sec):

                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145641
                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145639
                                                    I got the same kind of error over whole fetched workunits such as,
                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145741
                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145770

                                                    WTBroughton

                                                    Joined: Feb 17 06
                                                    Posts: 1
                                                    ID: 410
                                                    Credit: 8,123
                                                    RAC: 0
                                                    Message 1735 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 11:19:31 UTC

                                                      Just re-attached to project, 3 WU\'s failed after 12 secs.

                                                      BOINCLogX reports Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1); ERROR:: Exit at: .\\barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                      WTBroughton
                                                      BOINC in Northumberland
                                                      ____________

                                                      wizzszz

                                                      Joined: Apr 28 06
                                                      Posts: 17
                                                      ID: 1333
                                                      Credit: 1,128
                                                      RAC: 0
                                                      Message 1736 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 11:58:46 UTC

                                                        All WUs I tried crashed within the first seconds.


                                                        Unrecoverable error for result t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom009__612_6_0 (Unzulässige Funktion. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))

                                                        Unrecoverable error for result t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_cterm_hom017__610_9_0 (Unzulässige Funktion. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))

                                                        Unrecoverable error for result t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_cterm_hom001__610_3_1 (Unzulässige Funktion. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))

                                                        Unrecoverable error for result t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_cterm_hom001__612_10_0 (Unzulässige Funktion. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))


                                                        ____________

                                                        Mike Gelvin
                                                        Avatar

                                                        Joined: Feb 17 06
                                                        Posts: 50
                                                        ID: 468
                                                        Credit: 55,397
                                                        RAC: 0
                                                        Message 1737 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 15:06:20 UTC

                                                          Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 15:07:55 UTC

                                                          I confirm earlier reported error out condition:

                                                          Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1); ERROR:: Exit at: .\\barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                          in these two work units:

                                                          146315
                                                          145904

                                                          AND

                                                          after observing several more dormant cases, I conclude that the application goes dormant until the wall clock time reaches an even hour after the app starts before terminating \"normally\". This time is TO THE SECOND. This is independent of the CPU time taken.
                                                          ____________

                                                          dainenyu

                                                          Joined: Feb 19 06
                                                          Posts: 6
                                                          ID: 565
                                                          Credit: 7,772
                                                          RAC: 0
                                                          Message 1738 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 17:12:35 UTC

                                                            Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 17:53:02 UTC

                                                            I received 12 WUs using 5.19. Eleven t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_* and one t299__CASP7_ABRELAX. The ABRELAX is running fine (was able to suspend/resume with no problems), but all of the ABINITIOs errored out during initialization.

                                                            For the ABINITIOS:
                                                            <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                                            <message>
                                                            Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                                            </message>
                                                            <stderr_txt>
                                                            # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                                                            ERROR:: Exit at: .\\barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                            </stderr_txt>



                                                            Huh. While I was watching the ABRELAX, it whizzed along to step 340000, seemed to pause for a bit, and is now moving very slowly. And the \"to completion time\" keeps increasing. CPU keeps working, though.

                                                            Update: At 40 min (66.6% completion according to the graphic, 100% by the client), the ABRELAX unit seems to have gone dormant. Stopped at step 340539 in stage 2, not using any CPU. I\'ll keep an eye on it to see if/when it resumes.

                                                            Update2: Or...it really was finished? It exited with no problems and is valid. Never mind about that one then.
                                                            ____________

                                                            Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                                            Avatar

                                                            Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                            Posts: 182
                                                            ID: 296
                                                            Credit: 22,792
                                                            RAC: 0
                                                            Message 1739 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 18:37:10 UTC

                                                              Rosetta_beta 5.19 Windows

                                                              Exit status 1 (0x1)

                                                              Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                                              </message>
                                                              <stderr_txt>
                                                              ERROR:: Exit at: .\\barcode_classes.cc line:500


                                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=146649
                                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=146648
                                                              ____________
                                                              Click signature for global team stats

                                                              [B^S] sTrey
                                                              Avatar

                                                              Joined: Feb 15 06
                                                              Posts: 58
                                                              ID: 36
                                                              Credit: 15,430
                                                              RAC: 0
                                                              Message 1740 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 18:41:16 UTC

                                                                Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 18:43:19 UTC

                                                                Ditto, same error shown in this result.

                                                                Errored out immediately (cpu = 14 seconds) with the exit code 1 @ barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                                app is 5.19, client 5.4.9, windows XPsp2

                                                                Rhiju
                                                                Forum moderator
                                                                Project developer
                                                                Project scientist

                                                                Joined: Feb 14 06
                                                                Posts: 161
                                                                ID: 4
                                                                Credit: 3,725
                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                Message 1741 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 19:51:15 UTC - in response to Message 1740.

                                                                  Thanks for posting about this! I\'ve fixed the problem, and I\'m sending out the workunit again.

                                                                  Ditto, same error shown in this result.

                                                                  Errored out immediately (cpu = 14 seconds) with the exit code 1 @ barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                                  app is 5.19, client 5.4.9, windows XPsp2


                                                                  ____________

                                                                  Rhiju
                                                                  Forum moderator
                                                                  Project developer
                                                                  Project scientist

                                                                  Joined: Feb 14 06
                                                                  Posts: 161
                                                                  ID: 4
                                                                  Credit: 3,725
                                                                  RAC: 0
                                                                  Message 1742 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 19:57:05 UTC - in response to Message 1726.

                                                                    Hi: this behavior occurs for some work units (the ones with \"RELAX\" in the name). They should end up completing if you wait an hour. If the workunit is going beyond four times your preference (4x1 hours on ralph by default; 4x3 hours on rosetta@home by default), go ahead and abort it. I\'ve been paying close attention to WU\'s on my powerbook (Mac OS 10.4.2) -- the simulations do run slower on a Mac than on Windows (for now), but I\'ve never seen a workunit totally get stuck.

                                                                    rosetta_beta version 518
                                                                    WU Name: JUMP_RELAX_3142__t285__SAVE_ALL_OUT_594_22_0
                                                                    running on Mac OS 10.4.6

                                                                    BOINC Manager Tasks tab shows CPU Time stuck at 08:53:24 and 70%
                                                                    top command shows TIME = 36:04:48 and climbing

                                                                    stopped and restarted BOINC
                                                                    CPU Time reverted to 05:35:00 and 70% but no longer stuck


                                                                    ____________

                                                                    doc :)

                                                                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                                    Posts: 46
                                                                    ID: 60
                                                                    Credit: 4,437
                                                                    RAC: 0
                                                                    Message 1743 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 20:56:36 UTC

                                                                      got some interesting 5.19 stuff too, was not infront of my pc to see it happen mostly though.
                                                                      the first result took less than 2 hours (my ralph preference) to run according to the resultpage, in realtime it took almost exactly 2 hours to run.
                                                                      next result took just a little less than 2 hours of processing time looking at the result page, but took in fact 3 hours realtime.
                                                                      the third result took almost exactly 2 hours on the result page, but consumed 3 hours of realtime too.
                                                                      fourth was a little more complicated, it was running for 3 hours when it got preempted, cputime in the boincmanager was showing 1:59:07, the grahpics the same cpu time, 99.2% in the graphics, but 100% in boincmanager. upon being resumed it instantly completed.
                                                                      last i got ended with incorrect function right at the start. result

                                                                      wizzszz

                                                                      Joined: Apr 28 06
                                                                      Posts: 17
                                                                      ID: 1333
                                                                      Credit: 1,128
                                                                      RAC: 0
                                                                      Message 1744 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 13:28:50 UTC

                                                                        Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 13:47:31 UTC

                                                                        I think I found the problem causing the missing/broken graphic!!!!


                                                                        I am right now running following wu
                                                                        FRA_t301_hom029_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST__hom029_1_1bwzA__100_627_5_0 using rosetta_beta version 519

                                                                        It didn\'t display ANY of the three graphic... I played around with the mouse and suddenly got some graphic in the low energy window!

                                                                        I can rotate it with the mouse, so that it is completely rotated out of the window, and i can zoom it that big, that parts of the graphic are missing!!!

                                                                        As you can see on the third picture, the both other graphs have the same problem!

                                                                        I think, it is just the rotation center point that must be placed in the center of the model... Seems currently to be much behind the model....

                                                                        That would also fix the broken graph:
                                                                        Parts of the graphic vanish, because the model moves \"out\" of the display spa ce!

                                                                        Let me know if my poor english explanation did point the problem out, or if you have further questions!

                                                                        Update1: later in this model, the error vanishes, I think because the graphics change in a way that fixes the center point..




                                                                        ____________

                                                                        Pieface

                                                                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                                        Posts: 64
                                                                        ID: 234
                                                                        Credit: 203,513
                                                                        RAC: 0
                                                                        Message 1745 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 13:48:36 UTC

                                                                          I ran into one of those \'stuck\' abrelax wu\'s overnite:
                                                                          resid 144202
                                                                          running ralph 5.19 on my P-M laptop. It showed 100% done at 3:14:58 CPU time, but no activity, screensaver wouldn\'t come up (blank area only), task manager showed all cycles going to System Idle Process. Suspended acty and re-started Boinc, no-joy. Closed BM and re-started machine, brought it back up, no-joy. Aborted the WU and BM went right back to work. Didn\'t want to wait ?16hrs? (4x4) to see if it would somehow wake-up and finish on its own!

                                                                          wizzszz

                                                                          Joined: Apr 28 06
                                                                          Posts: 17
                                                                          ID: 1333
                                                                          Credit: 1,128
                                                                          RAC: 0
                                                                          Message 1746 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 14:20:18 UTC

                                                                            The wu mentioned below did show the same behaviour:

                                                                            BOINC reported 100%, GUI about 98! No CPU-usage!

                                                                            Had a similar problem with some HashClash units, maybe it is a problem of the
                                                                            BOINC 5.4.9 client..?
                                                                            ____________

                                                                            Mike Gelvin
                                                                            Avatar

                                                                            Joined: Feb 17 06
                                                                            Posts: 50
                                                                            ID: 468
                                                                            Credit: 55,397
                                                                            RAC: 0
                                                                            Message 1747 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 15:36:17 UTC - in response to Message 1745.

                                                                              Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 15:36:50 UTC

                                                                              I ran into one of those \'stuck\' abrelax wu\'s overnite:
                                                                              resid 144202
                                                                              running ralph 5.19 on my P-M laptop. It showed 100% done at 3:14:58 CPU time, but no activity, screensaver wouldn\'t come up (blank area only), task manager showed all cycles going to System Idle Process. Suspended acty and re-started Boinc, no-joy. Closed BM and re-started machine, brought it back up, no-joy. Aborted the WU and BM went right back to work. Didn\'t want to wait ?16hrs? (4x4) to see if it would somehow wake-up and finish on its own!


                                                                              My experiance with this is that it will always finish within one hour of getting into this mode. If you look at the messages, and see when the WU started, take the minutes and seconds portion (like 5:10:20). When your PC time (wall time) reaches the same minutes and seconds (like 7:10:20), the work unit will complete. I know its weird, but thats what I am seeing.

                                                                              Mike

                                                                              ____________

                                                                              doc :)

                                                                              Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                                              Posts: 46
                                                                              ID: 60
                                                                              Credit: 4,437
                                                                              RAC: 0
                                                                              Message 1748 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 16:42:45 UTC

                                                                                thats definetley something that has to be fixed before it goes out on the main project. out of the 4 5.19 units that i completed succesfully (2 hour pref) 3 wasted 1 hour that could have been used elsewhere, and the 4th used at least a couple of extra minutes to reach the 2 hour mark.

                                                                                Profile Fuzzy Hollynoodles
                                                                                Avatar

                                                                                Joined: Feb 19 06
                                                                                Posts: 37
                                                                                ID: 585
                                                                                Credit: 2,089
                                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                                Message 1749 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 18:31:09 UTC - in response to Message 1747.

                                                                                  I ran into one of those \'stuck\' abrelax wu\'s overnite:
                                                                                  resid 144202
                                                                                  running ralph 5.19 on my P-M laptop. It showed 100% done at 3:14:58 CPU time, but no activity, screensaver wouldn\'t come up (blank area only), task manager showed all cycles going to System Idle Process. Suspended acty and re-started Boinc, no-joy. Closed BM and re-started machine, brought it back up, no-joy. Aborted the WU and BM went right back to work. Didn\'t want to wait ?16hrs? (4x4) to see if it would somehow wake-up and finish on its own!


                                                                                  My experiance with this is that it will always finish within one hour of getting into this mode. If you look at the messages, and see when the WU started, take the minutes and seconds portion (like 5:10:20). When your PC time (wall time) reaches the same minutes and seconds (like 7:10:20), the work unit will complete. I know its weird, but thats what I am seeing.

                                                                                  Mike


                                                                                  Yes, this is really weird.

                                                                                  I have one stuck right now: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=129926

                                                                                  I took this screendump of the BOINC Manager: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v680/lsh55/Setiweb/Ralph/BOINC_Mgr_Ralph.jpg


                                                                                  And this is the graphic: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v680/lsh55/Setiweb/Ralph/RalphWU.jpg

                                                                                  This is really weird, the screen is rolling very fast to the left and this \"band\" is showing at the bottom of the screen.


                                                                                  I\'ll leave it as it is and see if it will finish as you say at the minute. Else I\'ll abort it.


                                                                                  ____________
                                                                                  "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me

                                                                                  Profile Fuzzy Hollynoodles
                                                                                  Avatar

                                                                                  Joined: Feb 19 06
                                                                                  Posts: 37
                                                                                  ID: 585
                                                                                  Credit: 2,089
                                                                                  RAC: 0
                                                                                  Message 1750 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 20:33:24 UTC - in response to Message 1749.

                                                                                    I ran into one of those \'stuck\' abrelax wu\'s overnite:
                                                                                    resid 144202
                                                                                    running ralph 5.19 on my P-M laptop. It showed 100% done at 3:14:58 CPU time, but no activity, screensaver wouldn\'t come up (blank area only), task manager showed all cycles going to System Idle Process. Suspended acty and re-started Boinc, no-joy. Closed BM and re-started machine, brought it back up, no-joy. Aborted the WU and BM went right back to work. Didn\'t want to wait ?16hrs? (4x4) to see if it would somehow wake-up and finish on its own!


                                                                                    My experiance with this is that it will always finish within one hour of getting into this mode. If you look at the messages, and see when the WU started, take the minutes and seconds portion (like 5:10:20). When your PC time (wall time) reaches the same minutes and seconds (like 7:10:20), the work unit will complete. I know its weird, but thats what I am seeing.

                                                                                    Mike


                                                                                    Yes, this is really weird.

                                                                                    I have one stuck right now: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=129926

                                                                                    I took this screendump of the BOINC Manager: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v680/lsh55/Setiweb/Ralph/BOINC_Mgr_Ralph.jpg


                                                                                    And this is the graphic: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v680/lsh55/Setiweb/Ralph/RalphWU.jpg

                                                                                    This is really weird, the screen is rolling very fast to the left and this \"band\" is showing at the bottom of the screen.


                                                                                    I\'ll leave it as it is and see if it will finish as you say at the minute. Else I\'ll abort it.



                                                                                    And yes, take a look at this log:

                                                                                    6/2/2006 8:08:25 PM|ralph@home|Resuming task t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom013__613_8_0 using rosetta_beta version 519
                                                                                    6/2/2006 8:08:25 PM|SETI@home|Deferring task 14ja99aa.5585.24832.678406.3.226_0
                                                                                    6/2/2006 8:08:25 PM|ralph@home|Pausing task t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom013__613_8_0 (removed from memory)

                                                                                    …

                                                                                    6/2/2006 8:08:44 PM|ralph@home|Restarting task t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom013__613_8_0 using rosetta_beta version 519
                                                                                    6/2/2006 8:08:45 PM|rosetta@home|Pausing task t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom002__637_621_1 (removed from memory)

                                                                                    ...

                                                                                    6/2/2006 9:08:46 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
                                                                                    6/2/2006 9:08:46 PM|ralph@home|Computation for task t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom013__613_8_0 finished
                                                                                    6/2/2006 9:08:46 PM|rosetta@home|Resuming task t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom002__637_621_1 using rosetta version 516
                                                                                    6/2/2006 9:08:48 PM|ralph@home|Started upload of file t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom013__613_8_0_0
                                                                                    6/2/2006 9:08:53 PM|ralph@home|Finished upload of file t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom013__613_8_0_0
                                                                                    6/2/2006 9:08:53 PM|ralph@home|Throughput 7090 bytes/sec



                                                                                    Now, this is weird.


                                                                                    ____________
                                                                                    "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me

                                                                                    casio7131

                                                                                    Joined: Mar 20 06
                                                                                    Posts: 15
                                                                                    ID: 1151
                                                                                    Credit: 12,660
                                                                                    RAC: 0
                                                                                    Message 1754 - Posted 3 Jun 2006 10:26:24 UTC

                                                                                      a latish error report (5.19b)
                                                                                      2/06/2006 7:09:40 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result t296__CASP7_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_nterm_hom002__610_7_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                                      http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=129365

                                                                                      Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                                                                      Avatar

                                                                                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                                                      Posts: 182
                                                                                      ID: 296
                                                                                      Credit: 22,792
                                                                                      RAC: 0
                                                                                      Message 1760 - Posted 3 Jun 2006 22:17:44 UTC

                                                                                        Rosetta_beta_5.19 Windows

                                                                                        This result has freeze. -> CPU 100% IDLE for about 6 hours

                                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=148639

                                                                                        *My preference runtime is 1 hour

                                                                                        If I dont abort it, may be, I crunch nothing more, forever !

                                                                                        I have try(ed) rebooting the pc, to no-avail !

                                                                                        By luck this has not occurred on an unmonitored PC at some remote location.
                                                                                        ____________
                                                                                        Click signature for global team stats

                                                                                        Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19


                                                                                        Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                                                                        Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                                                                        Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                                                                        Back to top ^