Bug Report for Ralph 5.26

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Report for Ralph 5.26

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Chu
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 06
Posts: 61
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2278 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 1:48:53 UTC

this is our first update since a long time. In this update, we include for the first time a protein-protein docking application, which is to predict the structure of a protein complex given the individual structures are known.
ID: 2278 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Norman_RKN

Send message
Joined: 26 Mar 06
Posts: 5
Credit: 4,877
RAC: 0
Message 2279 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 6:47:50 UTC - in response to Message 2278.  

i´ve no checkpointing with the new app! is it a bug or a feature ;)

ID: 2279 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Inais
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 13,115
RAC: 0
Message 2280 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 7:05:40 UTC
Last modified: 26 Sep 2006, 6:51:46 UTC

Is it normal, that the WU is now counting in single steps the separate models?

Count up to nearly 100% for model 1, jump back to 10% and start with model 2 etc.

Edit - how many models can be included in 1 WU?
I wish I can fly like a bird in the sky
ID: 2280 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Inais
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 13,115
RAC: 0
Message 2281 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 7:17:08 UTC

1st WU is done - no error message at the BOINC manager.

Looking into my reports:

DOCK_1AVW_unbound_perturb_benchmark_1315_13 show up a \"validate error\"

Biba - Inais.


I wish I can fly like a bird in the sky
ID: 2281 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[B^S] sTrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 58
Credit: 15,430
RAC: 0
Message 2282 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 7:56:36 UTC - in response to Message 2281.  

1st WU is done - no error message at the BOINC manager.

Looking into my reports:

DOCK_1AVW_unbound_perturb_benchmark_1315_13 show up a \"validate error\"

Biba - Inais.



Every DOCK wu I\'ve looked up has had nothing but validate errors. Does anyone know of one that\'s completed & validated successfully?
ID: 2282 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Honza

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 9
Credit: 1,962
RAC: 0
Message 2283 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 8:40:28 UTC

Same error here; suspending.
ID: 2283 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Inais
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 13,115
RAC: 0
Message 2284 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 9:17:31 UTC

An other one with \"validate error\"

DOCK_1ATN_unbound_perturb_benchmark_1315_10

Biba - Inais
ID: 2284 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
svenni96

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 2,326
RAC: 0
Message 2285 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 10:30:27 UTC
Last modified: 26 Sep 2006, 10:30:29 UTC

All my results get a validate error too.

It looks that the validator does not know what to do with the new results.
I could not believe that all results are invalid.

I will also suspend ralph till there is an information from one of the programmers


ID: 2285 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Femue

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 3,397
RAC: 0
Message 2286 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 11:47:00 UTC - in response to Message 2285.  

All my results get a validate error too.

It looks that the validator does not know what to do with the new results.
I could not believe that all results are invalid.

I will also suspend ralph till there is an information from one of the programmers



Howdie,

i have a 24-hour-wu that already ran for ~4 hours. I suspended it, too - but what should i do? Will the validator be corrected or is it better to abort the wu?

Femue
ID: 2286 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Krzychu P.

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 19
Credit: 13,277
RAC: 0
Message 2287 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 12:34:45 UTC

First I had 3 WUs with \'Validate error\'
And now each one is with \'Client error\' / \'Computing\'
In messages window I get:
2006-09-26 14:02:09|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result DOCK_1BVK_unbound_perturb_benchmark_1315_18_1 (Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
\'Niepoprawna funkcja\' = incorrect function
ID: 2287 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 166
Credit: 131,419
RAC: 0
Message 2288 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 12:53:55 UTC

ID: 2288 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Chu
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 06
Posts: 61
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2290 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 15:56:43 UTC

Thanks for all the feedbacks and reports. I started working on adding docking into Rosetta@home only from recently and am still learning how Rosetta@home and boinc work. I will consult with other experienced project developers in Baker Lab to invesgigate these errors and come back soon with answers.
ID: 2290 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
svenni96

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 2,326
RAC: 0
Message 2291 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 16:23:19 UTC

May be you could also think about if you will grant us credits for the validation error - wus?

I know its still alpha, but i wasted round about 10 hours cputime today. :(
ID: 2291 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Chu
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 06
Posts: 61
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2292 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 19:06:01 UTC

The validator has been updated to handle the docking output file with a slightly diifferent format and a couple of returning results have been validated with the new validator.

Docking application is being checkpointed, but the percentage of completion shown on the graphic was updated incorrectly in docking. This will be fixed in the next updated version.

Thanks for everyone\'s effort again.
ID: 2292 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Femue

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 3,397
RAC: 0
Message 2293 - Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 20:22:03 UTC - in response to Message 2292.  

The validator has been updated to handle the docking output file with a slightly diifferent format and a couple of returning results have been validated with the new validator.

Thanks for everyone\'s effort again.


No problem,

I have it running again ;-)

Femue
ID: 2293 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 166
Credit: 131,419
RAC: 0
Message 2300 - Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 9:26:34 UTC - in response to Message 2288.  

ID: 2300 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Report for Ralph 5.26



©2018 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org