why so little test time?

Message boards : Number crunching : why so little test time?

To post messages, you must log in.

zombie67 [MM]

Send message
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 70
Credit: 1,847,169
RAC: 0
Message 2626 - Posted: 15 Dec 2006, 1:56:40 UTC

I noticed that the new applications have had a very short test time before migrating to Rosetta from RALPH. I have also noticed that there have been a lot of revisions in a short time. Would it help to increase RALPH time before releasing to Rosetta?
Dublin, CA
SETI.USA - Stats - My stuff - BOINC IRC chat
ID: 2626 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 113,747
RAC: 0
Message 2664 - Posted: 8 Jan 2007, 13:36:10 UTC

I don\'t have a complete answer for you, but just wanted to point out that from what I can observe, the amount of testing done on Ralph is highly dependant on how dramatic the changes are that they have made to the application. If they bring out a completely new adaptation, like docking, they test considerably longer they if they just eliminate a few bugs or start on new proteins.

Also, they have their own farm in Bakerlab and test there before Ralph. So they have a pretty good testbed already.
ID: 2664 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : why so little test time?

©2018 University of Washington