| Author | Message |
|
|
|
Please post any server and php related bugs or issues here.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
> @ dekim, in the old Boinc version, I was unable to merge 2 computers after a computer problem (posted on the 21/11/06 under thread \"No Computers To Merge\").
Chu responded to my post on the 27/01/07 saying he was going to get the people responsible to have a look at the problem. I have not heard back so thought they were waiting for this new version to be implemented.
My question is with this new server version are you able to merge my two computers for me or is it still a problem? My preferences do not list the duplicate computer for me to merge it, my other post has all the details.
Thanks again for your time and help in this matter.
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at the Ralph home page, it seems everything is centered... which doesn\'t make sense for a list of bullets.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would this be an opportune time to remove the Q&A message boards and add a new board or two to the message boards?
____________
|
|
|
|
|
Would this be an opportune time to remove the Q&A message boards and add a new board or two to the message boards?
oh, please, please, please do ....
I has to be really bad publicity when someone post in the Q&A and by chance someone (like me) happens to feel like checking the Q&A and is able to answer the question and/or point them to the main message board to ask it there where it will get answered....
____________
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at the Ralph home page, it seems everything is centered... which doesn\'t make sense for a list of bullets.
It seems okay to me. What browser are you using?
DK
____________
|
|
|
|
|
Would this be an opportune time to remove the Q&A message boards and add a new board or two to the message boards?
oh, please, please, please do ....
I has to be really bad publicity when someone post in the Q&A and by chance someone (like me) happens to feel like checking the Q&A and is able to answer the question and/or point them to the main message board to ask it there where it will get answered....
What should the new board(s) be named?
Isn\'t the information in the Q&A worth keeping? There must be some common questions that are answered and that users can search for, that are helpful. ....or should it just be removed.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
I\'m using IE 6.0 on WIN/XP.
Sorry to say that I\'d vote to just killing the QA boards. If someone JUST posted a question there, it would be rude to kill it before anyone could resopnd. It would be nice to perhaps block new thread creation for a month before going \"lights out\" though. Or at LEAST sticky a \"don\'t post here\" thread before killing those boards. Even if that isn\'t possible, there\'s probably only 10 people that have posted in the past 2 weeks at any given time anyway.
Fluffy?? Any suggestions for names for a limited number of new boards to be added?
A \"Rosetta information (read only)\" board would be nice! Then move all the FAQs, Baker journal, descriptions of WUs and new Rosetta versions all under that board. Basically make the \"Project Information Index\" obsolete by putting all of those things under one board.
How about another just called \"frequently asked questions\"?
____________
|
|
|
|
|
Would this be an opportune time to remove the Q&A message boards and add a new board or two to the message boards? ...I has to be really bad publicity when someone post in the Q&A and by chance someone (like me) happens to feel like checking the Q&A and is able to answer the question and/or point them to the main message board to ask it there where it will get answered....
What should the new board(s) be named?
Isn\'t the information in the Q&A worth keeping? There must be some common questions that are answered and that users can search for, that are helpful. ....or should it just be removed.
Eric Myers on Pirates\' has found IMHO an elegant solution for this. At the top of the Pirates@Home Message Boards, the first line is
For Questions and Answers see also the Help Desk (Last post 16 hours ago)
I think it is not necessary to comment it.
Peter |
|
|