Bug reports for 5.71

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.71

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 06
Posts: 161
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 3264 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 21:58:47 UTC

Thanks for reporting errors!
ID: 3264 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
RAD-Poland

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 100,029
RAC: 0
Message 3265 - Posted: 5 Jul 2007, 8:13:33 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jul 2007, 8:17:08 UTC

Work Unit http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=578249

CPU time 47889.688918
<core_client_version>5.9.4</core_client_version>
process exited with code 1 (0x1)

<stderr_txt>
d cos value legal range
sin_cos_range ERROR: nan is outside of [-1,+1] sin and cos value legal range
...
sin_cos_range ERROR: nan is outside of [-1,+1] sin and cos value legal range
ERROR:: Exit from: refold.cc line: 338
</stderr_txt>
ID: 3265 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 113,747
RAC: 44
Message 3266 - Posted: 5 Jul 2007, 16:35:58 UTC

This thread needs sticky.
Older threads need to de-sticky.
ID: 3266 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 166
Credit: 131,419
RAC: 0
Message 3267 - Posted: 7 Jul 2007, 8:25:07 UTC

I have alot of - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
with this kind of wu-s

Anders n
ID: 3267 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
ramostol

Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 07
Posts: 24
Credit: 31,121
RAC: 0
Message 3268 - Posted: 7 Jul 2007, 9:18:03 UTC - in response to Message 3267.  

I have alot of - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
with this kind of wu-s

Anders n


Problems confirmed with this series of wus on Mac:

2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_10_0



2ffm_3_NMRREF_3_1pqx_1_idid_model_01IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_10_0


Crashed after 6-8 min., could not complete model 1 step 0, thread 2 crashing.

Exit status
-177 (0xffffffffffffff4f)

<message>
Maximum disk usage exceeded
</message>
[[Boinc is allowed 20 Gb disk space]]

ID: 3268 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
RAD-Poland

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 100,029
RAC: 0
Message 3269 - Posted: 7 Jul 2007, 20:59:26 UTC
Last modified: 7 Jul 2007, 21:00:33 UTC

Problems with this series of wus on Linux:
2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_08IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_4_2
2ffm_3_NMRREF_3_1pqx_1_idid_model_02IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_7_2
2ffm_2_NMRREF_2_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_10_1

CPU time 14.600912
<core_client_version>5.9.4</core_client_version>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1)

SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Stack trace (20 frames):
[0x8cf297b]
...
ID: 3269 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Dr Who Fan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 67
Credit: 74,063
RAC: 342
Message 3270 - Posted: 8 Jul 2007, 0:15:51 UTC
Last modified: 8 Jul 2007, 0:16:33 UTC

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=584533]

core_client_version>5.10.7</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
# random seed: 2388521


Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004D548A read attempt to address 0x07362000

Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
********************


ID: 3270 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Marky-UK

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 5
Credit: 1,530
RAC: 0
Message 3271 - Posted: 8 Jul 2007, 9:12:20 UTC - in response to Message 3270.  
Last modified: 8 Jul 2007, 9:13:09 UTC

These all failed the same way:

2ffm_2_NMRREF_2_1pqx_1_idid_model_01IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_1_2
2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_07IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_1_1
2ffm_4_NMRREF_4_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_5_2
2ffm_5_NMRREF_5_1pqx_1_idid_model_02IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_6_1
2ffm_2_NMRREF_2_1pqx_1_idid_model_08IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_6_1

<core_client_version>5.10.7</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
# random seed: 2388882


Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004D548A read attempt to address 0x07DB2000

(different random seed on them all, but the exit code and addresses are the same)
ID: 3271 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,356,387
RAC: 416
Message 3272 - Posted: 8 Jul 2007, 11:44:02 UTC
Last modified: 8 Jul 2007, 11:50:12 UTC

Lots of problems with the \'2ffm\' work units,
All fail after 10 to 20 seconds, as posted by others in above posts.
Had 12 fail.
Wont put links in as already some above, all mine are Access Violations.

WU numbers are 584610, 584477, 584408, 584406, 584398, 584386, 584382, 583681, 583679, 583205, 583199, 583094.
ID: 3272 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Golanth

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 223,780
RAC: 0
Message 3273 - Posted: 9 Jul 2007, 11:32:14 UTC

Hello

I\'ve a work unit, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=517057, that crunch since 53 hours 9 mn.

it\'s normal ? Can I abort then ?

thank

Laurent
ID: 3273 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,356,387
RAC: 416
Message 3274 - Posted: 9 Jul 2007, 12:12:15 UTC - in response to Message 3273.  

Hello

I\'ve a work unit, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=517057, that crunch since 53 hours 9 mn.

it\'s normal ? Can I abort then ?

thank

Laurent


Not normal. Maximum time in Rosetta that you can set in your prefances is 24 hours. Default is about 3 hours (I think). the only time that Rosetta disregards the prefance time is when it is trying to complete a Decoy (usually the first one).
I think you can abort that one. Appears stuck.
ID: 3274 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,356,387
RAC: 416
Message 3280 - Posted: 9 Jul 2007, 23:02:32 UTC

> Still failing on all \'2ffm\' type workunits in less than 10 seconds with Segmentation Violations.
585333
585332
ID: 3280 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tallguy-13088
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 10
Credit: 121,701
RAC: 0
Message 3281 - Posted: 10 Jul 2007, 1:51:52 UTC
Last modified: 10 Jul 2007, 1:54:28 UTC

Just aborted two workunits with 14 hours plus apiece. These same two workunits were restarted when I recycled BOINC Manager with 24+ hours on one and over 40 hours on the other. At the time, they were at 100% completion and recycled back to the beginning upon restart. They are:

Work Unit #1
and
Work Unit #2
ID: 3281 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
tallguy-13088
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 10
Credit: 121,701
RAC: 0
Message 3282 - Posted: 10 Jul 2007, 11:01:37 UTC

Add the following two workunits to the list of aborted workunits. Each significantly missed their target times and showed that they were in the INITIALIZING stage with 100% completion.

2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_06IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_1

and

2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_9
ID: 3282 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 113,747
RAC: 44
Message 3283 - Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 16:37:07 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jul 2007, 16:37:39 UTC

I just got this 2acy__BOINC_ABINITIO_BARCODE-2acy_-frags83__2230_424_0 WU and it is running in 65MB of memory!! That\'s HALF normal. I\'m on model 63 now and peak memory for the Windows task is 64MB.

Have you been working to reduce memory footprint? Or is it just an \"easy\" WU?
ID: 3283 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 113,747
RAC: 44
Message 3287 - Posted: 20 Jul 2007, 16:08:22 UTC

When displaying the graphic and pressing \"B\" three times to display the view with the balls, if you rotate the image 180 degrees to the left, you end up displaying the shaded portion of the sun effect. Seems the orientation of the sun should probably be fixed relative to the viewer of the graphic, so all the windows would always show the sun in the upper right, even if you rotate one of the images.

Also, currently running a Rosetta 5.68 jumping task and the image in the searching and accepted boxes is bouncing all around. i.e. it is not properly centered in the box. However, changing the view back to the ribbons and it is centered normally. Looks like the low energy box is effected the same way.
ID: 3287 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 06
Posts: 161
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 3289 - Posted: 22 Jul 2007, 21:50:53 UTC - in response to Message 3287.  

Sorry about this -- the shaded sphere view is experimental. Glad to hear that the ribbons view still works fine.

When displaying the graphic and pressing \"B\" three times to display the view with the balls, if you rotate the image 180 degrees to the left, you end up displaying the shaded portion of the sun effect. Seems the orientation of the sun should probably be fixed relative to the viewer of the graphic, so all the windows would always show the sun in the upper right, even if you rotate one of the images.

Also, currently running a Rosetta 5.68 jumping task and the image in the searching and accepted boxes is bouncing all around. i.e. it is not properly centered in the box. However, changing the view back to the ribbons and it is centered normally. Looks like the low energy box is effected the same way.


ID: 3289 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.71



©2018 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org