RALPH@home

Bug reports for 5.71

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.71

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Feb 14 06
Posts: 161
ID: 4
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 3264 - Posted 3 Jul 2007 21:58:47 UTC

    Thanks for reporting errors!
    ____________

    RAD-Poland

    Joined: Apr 6 07
    Posts: 6
    ID: 2897
    Credit: 100,029
    RAC: 0
    Message 3265 - Posted 5 Jul 2007 8:13:33 UTC

      Last modified: 5 Jul 2007 8:17:08 UTC

      Work Unit http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=578249

      CPU time 47889.688918
      <core_client_version>5.9.4</core_client_version>
      process exited with code 1 (0x1)

      <stderr_txt>
      d cos value legal range
      sin_cos_range ERROR: nan is outside of [-1,+1] sin and cos value legal range
      ...
      sin_cos_range ERROR: nan is outside of [-1,+1] sin and cos value legal range
      ERROR:: Exit from: refold.cc line: 338
      </stderr_txt>

      Profile feet1st

      Joined: Mar 7 06
      Posts: 312
      ID: 1028
      Credit: 110,522
      RAC: 0
      Message 3266 - Posted 5 Jul 2007 16:35:58 UTC

        This thread needs sticky.
        Older threads need to de-sticky.
        ____________

        Profile anders n

        Joined: Feb 16 06
        Posts: 166
        ID: 91
        Credit: 131,419
        RAC: 0
        Message 3267 - Posted 7 Jul 2007 8:25:07 UTC

          I have alot of - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
          with this kind of wu-s

          Anders n
          ____________

          ramostol

          Joined: Mar 29 07
          Posts: 24
          ID: 2840
          Credit: 31,121
          RAC: 0
          Message 3268 - Posted 7 Jul 2007 9:18:03 UTC - in response to Message 3267.

            I have alot of - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
            with this kind of wu-s

            Anders n


            Problems confirmed with this series of wus on Mac:
            [url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=583922]
            2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_10_0[/url]

            [url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=583939]
            2ffm_3_NMRREF_3_1pqx_1_idid_model_01IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_10_0[/url]

            Crashed after 6-8 min., could not complete model 1 step 0, thread 2 crashing.

            Exit status
            -177 (0xffffffffffffff4f)

            <message>
            Maximum disk usage exceeded
            </message>
            [[Boinc is allowed 20 Gb disk space]]

            RAD-Poland

            Joined: Apr 6 07
            Posts: 6
            ID: 2897
            Credit: 100,029
            RAC: 0
            Message 3269 - Posted 7 Jul 2007 20:59:26 UTC

              Last modified: 7 Jul 2007 21:00:33 UTC

              Problems with this series of wus on Linux:
              2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_08IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_4_2
              2ffm_3_NMRREF_3_1pqx_1_idid_model_02IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_7_2
              2ffm_2_NMRREF_2_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_10_1

              CPU time 14.600912
              <core_client_version>5.9.4</core_client_version>
              process exited with code 193 (0xc1)

              SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
              Stack trace (20 frames):
              [0x8cf297b]
              ...

              Dr Who Fan
              Avatar

              Joined: Sep 2 06
              Posts: 63
              ID: 1787
              Credit: 46,809
              RAC: 16
              Message 3270 - Posted 8 Jul 2007 0:15:51 UTC

                Last modified: 8 Jul 2007 0:16:33 UTC

                http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=584533]

                core_client_version>5.10.7</core_client_version>
                <![CDATA[
                <message>
                - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
                </message>
                <stderr_txt>
                # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
                # random seed: 2388521


                Unhandled Exception Detected...

                - Unhandled Exception Record -
                Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004D548A read attempt to address 0x07362000

                Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...
                ********************

                ____________

                Marky-UK

                Joined: Feb 16 06
                Posts: 5
                ID: 115
                Credit: 1,530
                RAC: 0
                Message 3271 - Posted 8 Jul 2007 9:12:20 UTC - in response to Message 3270.

                  Last modified: 8 Jul 2007 9:13:09 UTC

                  These all failed the same way:

                  2ffm_2_NMRREF_2_1pqx_1_idid_model_01IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_1_2
                  2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_07IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_1_1
                  2ffm_4_NMRREF_4_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_5_2
                  2ffm_5_NMRREF_5_1pqx_1_idid_model_02IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_6_1
                  2ffm_2_NMRREF_2_1pqx_1_idid_model_08IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_6_1

                  <core_client_version>5.10.7</core_client_version>
                  <![CDATA[
                  <message>
                  - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
                  </message>
                  <stderr_txt>
                  # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                  # random seed: 2388882


                  Unhandled Exception Detected...

                  - Unhandled Exception Record -
                  Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004D548A read attempt to address 0x07DB2000

                  (different random seed on them all, but the exit code and addresses are the same)

                  Profile Conan
                  Avatar

                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                  Posts: 344
                  ID: 145
                  Credit: 1,309,534
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 3272 - Posted 8 Jul 2007 11:44:02 UTC

                    Last modified: 8 Jul 2007 11:50:12 UTC

                    Lots of problems with the \'2ffm\' work units,
                    All fail after 10 to 20 seconds, as posted by others in above posts.
                    Had 12 fail.
                    Wont put links in as already some above, all mine are Access Violations.

                    WU numbers are 584610, 584477, 584408, 584406, 584398, 584386, 584382, 583681, 583679, 583205, 583199, 583094.
                    ____________

                    Golanth

                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                    Posts: 1
                    ID: 315
                    Credit: 212,075
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 3273 - Posted 9 Jul 2007 11:32:14 UTC

                      Hello

                      I\'ve a work unit, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=517057, that crunch since 53 hours 9 mn.

                      it\'s normal ? Can I abort then ?

                      thank

                      Laurent
                      ____________

                      Profile Conan
                      Avatar

                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                      Posts: 344
                      ID: 145
                      Credit: 1,309,534
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 3274 - Posted 9 Jul 2007 12:12:15 UTC - in response to Message 3273.

                        Hello

                        I\'ve a work unit, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=517057, that crunch since 53 hours 9 mn.

                        it\'s normal ? Can I abort then ?

                        thank

                        Laurent


                        Not normal. Maximum time in Rosetta that you can set in your prefances is 24 hours. Default is about 3 hours (I think). the only time that Rosetta disregards the prefance time is when it is trying to complete a Decoy (usually the first one).
                        I think you can abort that one. Appears stuck.
                        ____________

                        Profile Conan
                        Avatar

                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                        Posts: 344
                        ID: 145
                        Credit: 1,309,534
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 3280 - Posted 9 Jul 2007 23:02:32 UTC

                          > Still failing on all \'2ffm\' type workunits in less than 10 seconds with Segmentation Violations.
                          585333
                          585332
                          ____________

                          tallguy-13088
                          Avatar

                          Joined: Feb 17 06
                          Posts: 10
                          ID: 376
                          Credit: 121,701
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 3281 - Posted 10 Jul 2007 1:51:52 UTC

                            Last modified: 10 Jul 2007 1:54:28 UTC

                            Just aborted two workunits with 14 hours plus apiece. These same two workunits were restarted when I recycled BOINC Manager with 24+ hours on one and over 40 hours on the other. At the time, they were at 100% completion and recycled back to the beginning upon restart. They are:

                            Work Unit #1
                            and
                            Work Unit #2
                            ____________

                            tallguy-13088
                            Avatar

                            Joined: Feb 17 06
                            Posts: 10
                            ID: 376
                            Credit: 121,701
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 3282 - Posted 10 Jul 2007 11:01:37 UTC

                              Add the following two workunits to the list of aborted workunits. Each significantly missed their target times and showed that they were in the INITIALIZING stage with 100% completion.

                              2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_06IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_1

                              and

                              2ffm_1_NMRREF_1_1pqx_1_idid_model_04IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_2218_9
                              ____________

                              Profile feet1st

                              Joined: Mar 7 06
                              Posts: 312
                              ID: 1028
                              Credit: 110,522
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 3283 - Posted 13 Jul 2007 16:37:07 UTC

                                Last modified: 13 Jul 2007 16:37:39 UTC

                                I just got this 2acy__BOINC_ABINITIO_BARCODE-2acy_-frags83__2230_424_0 WU and it is running in 65MB of memory!! That\'s HALF normal. I\'m on model 63 now and peak memory for the Windows task is 64MB.

                                Have you been working to reduce memory footprint? Or is it just an \"easy\" WU?
                                ____________

                                Profile feet1st

                                Joined: Mar 7 06
                                Posts: 312
                                ID: 1028
                                Credit: 110,522
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 3287 - Posted 20 Jul 2007 16:08:22 UTC

                                  When displaying the graphic and pressing \"B\" three times to display the view with the balls, if you rotate the image 180 degrees to the left, you end up displaying the shaded portion of the sun effect. Seems the orientation of the sun should probably be fixed relative to the viewer of the graphic, so all the windows would always show the sun in the upper right, even if you rotate one of the images.

                                  Also, currently running a Rosetta 5.68 jumping task and the image in the searching and accepted boxes is bouncing all around. i.e. it is not properly centered in the box. However, changing the view back to the ribbons and it is centered normally. Looks like the low energy box is effected the same way.
                                  ____________

                                  Rhiju
                                  Forum moderator
                                  Project developer
                                  Project scientist

                                  Joined: Feb 14 06
                                  Posts: 161
                                  ID: 4
                                  Credit: 3,725
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 3289 - Posted 22 Jul 2007 21:50:53 UTC - in response to Message 3287.

                                    Sorry about this -- the shaded sphere view is experimental. Glad to hear that the ribbons view still works fine.

                                    When displaying the graphic and pressing \"B\" three times to display the view with the balls, if you rotate the image 180 degrees to the left, you end up displaying the shaded portion of the sun effect. Seems the orientation of the sun should probably be fixed relative to the viewer of the graphic, so all the windows would always show the sun in the upper right, even if you rotate one of the images.

                                    Also, currently running a Rosetta 5.68 jumping task and the image in the searching and accepted boxes is bouncing all around. i.e. it is not properly centered in the box. However, changing the view back to the ribbons and it is centered normally. Looks like the low energy box is effected the same way.


                                    ____________

                                    Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.71


                                    Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                    Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                    Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                    Back to top ^