Bug reports for 5.85

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.85

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
j2satx

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 42
Credit: 168,797
RAC: 0
Message 3505 - Posted: 6 Dec 2007, 17:54:22 UTC


It appears all my Linux is throwing error 255(0xFF)

ID: 3505 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Dr Who Fan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 67
Credit: 80,281
RAC: 23
Message 3510 - Posted: 7 Dec 2007, 20:13:03 UTC

Several to report with the same bug ERROR:: Exit from: .\\fragments.cc line: 465
All have naming starting with: 1vie__BOINC_ABINITIO_BEST25_VF_SCORE3-16

tasks:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=692016
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=689875
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=689257
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=689190
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=687198
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=686916
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=686809
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=686327

All with same exit sequence/location:
Exit status 1 (0x1)
stderr out

<core_client_version>5.10.28</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
ERROR:: Exit from: .\\fragments.cc line: 465

</stderr_txt>
]]>



ID: 3510 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 06
Posts: 104
Credit: 36,890
RAC: 0
Message 3512 - Posted: 7 Dec 2007, 23:19:28 UTC - in response to Message 3510.  

Several to report with the same bug ERROR:: Exit from: .\\fragments.cc line: 465
All have naming starting with: 1vie__BOINC_ABINITIO_BEST25_VF_SCORE3-16

Here is the description.

Peter
ID: 3512 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 3513 - Posted: 10 Dec 2007, 3:44:51 UTC

All recent WU\'s are being granted exactly what they claim. Fixed credits not working.

Examples 695338
695400
695401
695408
696125


ID: 3513 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
j2satx

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 42
Credit: 168,797
RAC: 0
Message 3514 - Posted: 10 Dec 2007, 14:42:13 UTC - in response to Message 3513.  

All recent WU\'s are being granted exactly what they claim. Fixed credits not working.

Examples 695338
695400
695401
695408
696125



When did fixed credits begin?

I don\'t find a single WU for my systems (back to August) with fixed credits.

ID: 3514 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 06
Posts: 104
Credit: 36,890
RAC: 0
Message 3515 - Posted: 10 Dec 2007, 15:42:27 UTC - in response to Message 3514.  

All recent WU\'s are being granted exactly what they claim. Fixed credits not working.

When did fixed credits begin?

I don\'t find a single WU for my systems (back to August) with fixed credits.

I tend to believe. I\'ve also (currently at least) one BOINC_ABINITIO_VF_IGNORE_THE_REST task 696464 (8. dec) and one BOINC_ABINITIO_VFSCORE3 task 684913 (4. dec), which received exactly the claimed credit.

All tasks Conan mentioned are also named BOINC_ABINITIO_VF_IGNORE_THE_REST. Possibly there are not enough results of such type being crunched yet? IIRC the credit is granted according to some average of different claimed credits from similar tasks...

Peter
ID: 3515 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
BigMike
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 06
Posts: 63
Credit: 58,730
RAC: 0
Message 3516 - Posted: 10 Dec 2007, 18:13:06 UTC - in response to Message 3510.  
Last modified: 10 Dec 2007, 18:13:53 UTC

Got the same crash as Dr. Who Fan and Pepo.

==Mike
Don't believe everything you think.
ID: 3516 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 06
Posts: 104
Credit: 36,890
RAC: 0
Message 3522 - Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 0:30:26 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2007, 0:51:17 UTC

As I noted few weeks ago in the bug report for version 5.81 thread:
Message 3443 - Posted 4 Nov 2007 17:12:00 UTC
------------------------
This is neither a bug report at all, nor a complaint, only an observation. I\'ve just noticed, that as the Rosetta Beta 5.80 task (..._TREEJUMP_ABRELAX_TOR_...) was requiring up to 20 MB virtual memory and was capable of using 170 MB RAM, my current Rosetta Beta 5.81 task (..._BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_...) currently needs 500 MB memory and can use up to 350 MB RAM. Nice big numbers...

Now I\'m running rosetta@home\'s Rosetta 5.85 task 126118387 (..._BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-...._-crystal_foldanddock_...), which continuously needs no less than 927 MB and peaked at 937.5 MB.

It\'s paired now with ralph@home\'s Rosetta 5.87 task 702882 (..._BOINC_POSE_ABRELAX-...), consuming 561 MB - it means that these memory requirements are becomming very common, as do multi-CPU machines.

As the memory requirements start to substantially differ from the Rosetta\'s Recommended System Requirements (especially the mimimum required 200 MB and recommended \"Leave applications in memory while preempted\"), I\'d heartily suggest revisioning the page.

Ralph\'s Recommended System Requirements are more up-to-date (or do they really talk about RAM only??), but still, suddenly requiring nearly two gigs of swap for Rosetta in addition to a running 2 CPU system is not something, that would be expected by many not-a-geek Rosetta-only participants. Add few other preempted tasks for multi-project crunchers...

Peter
ID: 3522 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 113,747
RAC: 0
Message 3525 - Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 5:44:38 UTC

I\'ve recently had a few where granted was exactly same as claim. On the first one, I presumed with the small number of people on Ralph, and small number of WUs sent out, that I must have just been the lucky first person to report... But now I see I\'ve got several, as do others... so seems something\'s up.

1acf__BOINC_ABINITIO_VF_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-15-S3-6--1acf_-vf__2677_1_0
1ig5A_BOINC_ABINITIO_BEST25_VF_SCORE3-7--1ig5A-vf__2665_3_0
1hz6A_BOINC_ABINITIO_BEST25_VF_SCORE3-18--1hz6A-vf__2665_2_0
1enh__BOINC_ABINITIO_VFSCORE25-14-_SKIP3-1enh_-vf__2615_1_0

...and I just picked up one from vers 5.87
1elwAWHS_ETABLE_SVM_TESTS-1elwA-frags83__2714_10_0
ID: 3525 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 06
Posts: 104
Credit: 36,890
RAC: 0
Message 3526 - Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 8:36:49 UTC

One more 5.87 task granted exactly what it claimed: ..._BOINC_POSE_ABRELAX-1hz6A-_... task 702882.

Peter
ID: 3526 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.85



©2018 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org