RALPH@home

Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.30

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.30

AuthorMessage
Profile dekim
Forum moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Jan 20 06
Posts: 210
ID: 1
Credit: 399,745
RAC: 1,342
Message 4163 - Posted 14 Jul 2008 22:26:25 UTC

    Please post issues/bugs regarding minirosetta version 1.30 here.

    This version contains various science updates.

    This version also includes updated graphics that look like the rosetta++ screensaver. Please keep in mind that the refresh rate may be slower compared to rosetta++ due to extra overhead necessary for using a separate graphics application and shared data. You can increase the rate at the cost of cpu usage by increasing the \"Percentage of CPU time used for graphics\" project preference.

    A linux graphics application is also available now.
    ____________

    Profile Conan
    Avatar

    Joined: Feb 16 06
    Posts: 344
    ID: 145
    Credit: 1,309,534
    RAC: 0
    Message 4164 - Posted 14 Jul 2008 22:51:58 UTC

      What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing.
      You have removed them from the database as well so we can\'t check them.
      You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don\'t have any of.
      ____________

      Profile dekim
      Forum moderator
      Project administrator
      Project developer
      Project scientist

      Joined: Jan 20 06
      Posts: 210
      ID: 1
      Credit: 399,745
      RAC: 1,342
      Message 4165 - Posted 14 Jul 2008 23:11:29 UTC - in response to Message 4164.

        What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing.
        You have removed them from the database as well so we can\'t check them.
        You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don\'t have any of.


        I am not aware of any cancelled work units with the exception of the \"t405\" jobs that caused clients to sometimes stall. Those were cancelled sometime in June.

        We should have some jobs queued soon.
        ____________

        Path7

        Joined: Feb 11 08
        Posts: 56
        ID: 4036
        Credit: 4,974
        RAC: 0
        Message 4166 - Posted 14 Jul 2008 23:35:14 UTC - in response to Message 4164.

          What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing.
          You have removed them from the database as well so we can\'t check them.
          You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don\'t have any of.

          Hello all,
          I\'ve no Ralph Wu\'s currently running, but saw this in Boinc messages:

          di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST|ralph@home|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev20412.zip
          di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST|ralph@home|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev20940.zip
          di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST|ralph@home|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev21566.zip
          di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST|ralph@home|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev22619.zip

          Well, thats 60 MB less on my harddisk.

          Have a nice day,
          Path7.

          Profile dekim
          Forum moderator
          Project administrator
          Project developer
          Project scientist

          Joined: Jan 20 06
          Posts: 210
          ID: 1
          Credit: 399,745
          RAC: 1,342
          Message 4167 - Posted 15 Jul 2008 3:08:36 UTC

            Along with the app update, I updated our scheduler to tell clients to remove old minirosetta database files. Apparently, the only way to remove persistent files is by adding the info in the scheduler reply.
            ____________

            Profile dekim
            Forum moderator
            Project administrator
            Project developer
            Project scientist

            Joined: Jan 20 06
            Posts: 210
            ID: 1
            Credit: 399,745
            RAC: 1,342
            Message 4168 - Posted 15 Jul 2008 3:59:51 UTC

              Last modified: 15 Jul 2008 4:04:01 UTC

              I accidentally submitted some bad batches. Please ignore errors with the following in the task name \'_4664_\' and \'_4591_\'. These should error out quickly. I have cancelled these tasks.
              ____________

              Profile Conan
              Avatar

              Joined: Feb 16 06
              Posts: 344
              ID: 145
              Credit: 1,309,534
              RAC: 0
              Message 4169 - Posted 15 Jul 2008 14:23:43 UTC - in response to Message 4165.

                What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing.
                You have removed them from the database as well so we can\'t check them.
                You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don\'t have any of.


                I am not aware of any cancelled work units with the exception of the \"t405\" jobs that caused clients to sometimes stall. Those were cancelled sometime in June.

                We should have some jobs queued soon.


                I got the same message that Path7 got and then had current workunits deleted from my computer. The 5.98 ones were ok and kept going, they have all been successful.
                ____________

                Profile dekim
                Forum moderator
                Project administrator
                Project developer
                Project scientist

                Joined: Jan 20 06
                Posts: 210
                ID: 1
                Credit: 399,745
                RAC: 1,342
                Message 4170 - Posted 15 Jul 2008 14:56:20 UTC

                  Okay, this must be a bug in the boinc client. It shouldn\'t delete current mini tasks since the database files that are deleted should not be used by or associated with the current tasks.
                  ____________

                  Speedy

                  Joined: Dec 4 06
                  Posts: 8
                  ID: 2327
                  Credit: 1,985
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 4171 - Posted 21 Jul 2008 5:09:16 UTC - in response to Message 4165.

                    We should have some jobs queued soon.

                    Will there be another batch of test jobs before this app goes to the public project?
                    Cheers
                    Speedy

                    Speedy

                    Joined: Dec 4 06
                    Posts: 8
                    ID: 2327
                    Credit: 1,985
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 4173 - Posted 2 Aug 2008 5:58:34 UTC

                      Last modified: 2 Aug 2008 6:00:45 UTC

                      When will there be some work to test the latest app 1.32, or are we due to go public with this early next week (4/8/08)?
                      Cheers
                      Speedy

                      Evan

                      Joined: Dec 23 07
                      Posts: 75
                      ID: 3893
                      Credit: 69,584
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 4184 - Posted 27 Aug 2008 9:20:14 UTC

                        Computation error with this Mini version 1.32 1081622

                        <message>
                        - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
                        </message>
                        <stderr_txt>


                        Unhandled Exception Detected...

                        - Unhandled Exception Record -
                        Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00516CF1 read attempt to address 0x0000003E

                        Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.30


                        Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                        Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                        Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                        Back to top ^