Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.30

Author	Message
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 4163 - Posted: 14 Jul 2008, 22:26:25 UTC Please post issues/bugs regarding minirosetta version 1.30 here. This version contains various science updates. This version also includes updated graphics that look like the rosetta++ screensaver. Please keep in mind that the refresh rate may be slower compared to rosetta++ due to extra overhead necessary for using a separate graphics application and shared data. You can increase the rate at the cost of cpu usage by increasing the "Percentage of CPU time used for graphics" project preference. A linux graphics application is also available now. ID: 4163 · Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0	Message 4164 - Posted: 14 Jul 2008, 22:51:58 UTC What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing. You have removed them from the database as well so we can't check them. You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don't have any of. ID: 4164 · Reply Quote

dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 4165 - Posted: 14 Jul 2008, 23:11:29 UTC - in response to Message 4164. What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing. You have removed them from the database as well so we can't check them. You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don't have any of. I am not aware of any cancelled work units with the exception of the "t405" jobs that caused clients to sometimes stall. Those were cancelled sometime in June. We should have some jobs queued soon. ID: 4165 · Reply Quote

Path7 Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 56 Credit: 4,974 RAC: 0	Message 4166 - Posted: 14 Jul 2008, 23:35:14 UTC - in response to Message 4164. What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing. You have removed them from the database as well so we can't check them. You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don't have any of. Hello all, I've no Ralph Wu's currently running, but saw this in Boinc messages: di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST\|ralph@home\|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev20412.zip di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST\|ralph@home\|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev20940.zip di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST\|ralph@home\|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev21566.zip di 15 jul 2008 00:38:25 CEST\|ralph@home\|Got server request to delete file minirosetta_database_rev22619.zip Well, thats 60 MB less on my harddisk. Have a nice day, Path7. ID: 4166 · Reply Quote

dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 4167 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 3:08:36 UTC Along with the app update, I updated our scheduler to tell clients to remove old minirosetta database files. Apparently, the only way to remove persistent files is by adding the info in the scheduler reply. ID: 4167 · Reply Quote

dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 4168 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 3:59:51 UTC Last modified: 15 Jul 2008, 4:04:01 UTC I accidentally submitted some bad batches. Please ignore errors with the following in the task name '_4664_' and '_4591_'. These should error out quickly. I have cancelled these tasks. ID: 4168 · Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0	Message 4169 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 14:23:43 UTC - in response to Message 4165. What is the go with deleting all the previous minirosetta workunits from my computer AFTER I had completed them, I lost over 36 hours of successful processing. You have removed them from the database as well so we can't check them. You removed the old ones when you released the new ones, which I don't have any of. I am not aware of any cancelled work units with the exception of the "t405" jobs that caused clients to sometimes stall. Those were cancelled sometime in June. We should have some jobs queued soon. I got the same message that Path7 got and then had current workunits deleted from my computer. The 5.98 ones were ok and kept going, they have all been successful. ID: 4169 · Reply Quote

dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 4170 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 14:56:20 UTC Okay, this must be a bug in the boinc client. It shouldn't delete current mini tasks since the database files that are deleted should not be used by or associated with the current tasks. ID: 4170 · Reply Quote

Speedy Send message Joined: 4 Dec 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,985 RAC: 0	Message 4171 - Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 5:09:16 UTC - in response to Message 4165. We should have some jobs queued soon. Will there be another batch of test jobs before this app goes to the public project? Cheers Speedy ID: 4171 · Reply Quote

Speedy Send message Joined: 4 Dec 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,985 RAC: 0	Message 4173 - Posted: 2 Aug 2008, 5:58:34 UTC Last modified: 2 Aug 2008, 6:00:45 UTC When will there be some work to test the latest app 1.32, or are we due to go public with this early next week (4/8/08)? Cheers Speedy ID: 4173 · Reply Quote

Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 07 Posts: 75 Credit: 69,584 RAC: 0	Message 4184 - Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 9:20:14 UTC Computation error with this Mini version 1.32 1081622 <message> - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) </message> <stderr_txt> Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00516CF1 read attempt to address 0x0000003E ID: 4184 · Reply Quote