Minirosetta 1.61

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta 1.61

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
mtyka
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 4776 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 3:07:52 UTC

Hi everyone,

Here's the new bug thread for 1.60 (1.59 had a quirk).

THis one has largerly new code in it but not a lot of bugfixes - I hope it's as stable as the last one, that's what we need to find out.

Thanks for all your bugreports!

Mike

ID: 4776 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 113,747
RAC: 0
Message 4777 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 4:31:47 UTC

minirosetta_database_rev28862.zip ...116MB??? The other DBs were more like 16!
ID: 4777 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mtyka
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 4778 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 5:03:19 UTC - in response to Message 4777.  

Hmmm seriously 116 MB ? Ok, something must have gone wrong there...
ID: 4778 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mtyka
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 08
Posts: 79
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 4779 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 5:11:16 UTC - in response to Message 4778.  

Ok, we're back to 18MB.

With App 1.61
ID: 4779 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Paul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 14 Jan 09
Posts: 62
Credit: 33,293
RAC: 0
Message 4780 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 6:42:30 UTC - in response to Message 4776.  

Hi everyone,

Here's the new bug thread for 1.60 (1.59 had a quirk).

THis one has largerly new code in it but not a lot of bugfixes - I hope it's as stable as the last one, that's what we need to find out.

Thanks for all your bugreports!

Mike


So do we kill the 1.59 tasks?
ID: 4780 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Snagletooth

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 67
Credit: 132,513
RAC: 0
Message 4781 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 9:17:15 UTC

DvR115G_BOINC_ABINITIO_RDC_TEST_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-15-S3-28--DvR115G-_9225_1 crashed after 14.56 seconds, one second faster than the first attempt with Minirosetta 1.59.
ID: 4781 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Evan

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 07
Posts: 75
Credit: 69,584
RAC: 0
Message 4782 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 9:57:54 UTC - in response to Message 4776.  

I assume the problem for 1.59 was the graphics.
ID: 4782 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
svincent

Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 08
Posts: 34
Credit: 51,768
RAC: 0
Message 4783 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 15:01:38 UTC

These 3 tasks all (named DvR115G_BOINC_ABINITIO*) crashed almost immediately on Mac in the same routine

1424622
1424561
1423738

Crashed executable name: minirosetta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin
built using BOINC library version 6.5.0
Machine type Intel 80486 (32-bit executable)
System version: Macintosh OS 10.4.11 build 8S2167
Thu Apr 16 03:11:08 2009

Thread 0 Crashed:
0 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x0098727b __ZNK4core7scoring7methods29ResidualDipolarCouplingEnergy16calc_ordermatrixERKmS4_RN9ObjexxFCL8FArray2DIdEERNS5_8FArray1DIdEESB_Rb + 4429
1 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00989832 __ZNK4core7scoring7methods29ResidualDipolarCouplingEnergy12eval_dipolarERNS_4pose4PoseE + 1150
2 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x0098a1aa __ZNK4core7scoring7methods29ResidualDipolarCouplingEnergy21finalize_total_energyERNS_4pose4PoseERKNS0_13ScoreFunctionERNS0_10EMapVectorE + 24
3 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00189868 __ZNK4core7scoring13ScoreFunctionclERNS_4pose4PoseE + 4378
4 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x003285bb __ZN9protocols5moves10MonteCarlo14score_functionERKN4core7scoring13ScoreFunctionE + 129
5 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00564535 __ZN9protocols8abinitio15ClassicAbinitio16replace_scorefxnERN4core4pose4PoseENS1_7StageIDEd + 309
6 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00563fd9 __ZN9protocols8abinitio15ClassicAbinitio14prepare_stage2ERN4core4pose4PoseE + 51
7 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x0056fa42 __ZN9protocols8abinitio15ClassicAbinitio5applyERN4core4pose4PoseE + 1774
8 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00120d0b __ZN9protocols8abinitio18AbrelaxApplication4foldERN4core4pose4PoseEN7utility7pointer10owning_ptrINS_8ProtocolEEE + 4093
9 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x001335a7 __ZN9protocols8abinitio18AbrelaxApplication3runEv + 807
10 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00003bbb _main + 1395
11 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00001eee __start + 216
12 ...etta_1.59_i686-apple-darwin 0x00001e15 start + 41


This one 1424657 (broker_lb_test2_hb_t369__IGNORE_THE_REST_9256_1_1) also crashed after apparent successful completion due to a file error.

======================================================
DONE :: 5 starting structures 3392.47 cpu seconds
This process generated 5 decoys from 5 attempts
======================================================

BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down cleanly ...
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
<message>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>broker_lb_test2_hb_t369__IGNORE_THE_REST_9256_1_1_0</file_name>
<error_code>-161</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>
]]>

ID: 4783 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Paul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 14 Jan 09
Posts: 62
Credit: 33,293
RAC: 0
Message 4784 - Posted: 16 Apr 2009, 16:59:42 UTC

On OS-X I am getting:

sh: /usr/bin/atos: No such file or directory
0 0x0067c69d SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
1 0x0045e59a SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
2 0x01fd52bb SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
3 0xffffffff SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
4 0x00989832 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
5 0x0098a1aa SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
6 0x00189868 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
7 0x003285bb SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
8 0x00564535 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
9 0x00563fd9 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
10 0x0056fa42 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
11 0x00120d0b SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
12 0x001335a7 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
13 0x00003bbb SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
14 0x00001eee SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
15 0x00001e15

1424721
1424742
1424743
1424747


On XP Pro 32-Bit

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00611ED9 write attempt to address 0x00000000

1424865

It is probably the same problem but seen differently by the two OS ...
ID: 4784 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta 1.61



©2018 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org