RALPH@home

minirosetta_1.64

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta_1.64

AuthorMessage
mtyka
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Mar 19 08
Posts: 79
ID: 4144
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 4802 - Posted 28 Apr 2009 21:48:42 UTC

    Report sightings of flies, bees, mites, mosquito and other bugs here please.

    Mike


    Billy

    Joined: Jan 29 07
    Posts: 13
    ID: 2592
    Credit: 5,855
    RAC: 0
    Message 4803 - Posted 29 Apr 2009 1:19:56 UTC - in response to Message 4802.

      This wasn't good.

      http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1431002

      Profile Paul D. Buck

      Joined: Jan 14 09
      Posts: 62
      ID: 5139
      Credit: 33,293
      RAC: 0
      Message 4804 - Posted 29 Apr 2009 7:49:04 UTC

        Segpipe errors on 3 tasks:

        SIGSEGV: segmentation violation

        Crashed executable name: minirosetta_1.64_i686-apple-darwin
        built using BOINC library version 6.5.0
        Machine type Intel 80486 (32-bit executable)
        System version: Macintosh OS 10.5.6 build 9G55
        Tue Apr 28 18:55:15 2009

        sh: /usr/bin/atos: No such file or directory
        0 0x006b149b SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        1 0x0048754e SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        2 0x0215d2bb SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        3 0xffffffff SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        4 0x0017555a SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        5 0x0018b2ed SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        6 0x00517aae SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        7 0x004fce90 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        8 0x00b4494b SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        9 0x00120021 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        10 0x000048fd SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        11 0x000026ae SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        12 0x000025d5 SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
        13 0x00000019
        Thread 0 crashed with X86 Thread State (32-bit):
        eax: 0xffffffe1 ebx: 0x02125802 ecx: 0xbfffb8cc edx: 0x020f11c6
        edi: 0x00000000 esi: 0x00000000 ebp: 0xbfffb908 esp: 0xbfffb8cc
        ss: 0x0000001f efl: 0x00000206 eip: 0x020f11c6 cs: 0x00000007
        ds: 0x0000001f es: 0x0000001f fs: 0x00000000 gs: 0x00000037

        1431298
        1431297
        1431275

        Profile feet1st

        Joined: Mar 7 06
        Posts: 312
        ID: 1028
        Credit: 110,522
        RAC: 1
        Message 4805 - Posted 29 Apr 2009 14:08:08 UTC

          Last modified: 29 Apr 2009 14:08:32 UTC

          WinXP, BOINC 5.10.45
          this task called broker_lb_test3_hb_t288__IGNORE_THE_REST_9374_4_0 had a 24hr runtime preference, but ended after only 3hrs with these msgs:
          ERROR: pose.fold_tree().is_cutpoint( *it )
          ERROR:: Exit from: ..\..\src\protocols\topology_broker\TopologyBroker.cc line: 560


          It finished as a "valid" "success" and so was not resent to get a second opinion on whether or not it would fail elsewhere.
          ____________

          I _ quit

          Joined: Jan 13 09
          Posts: 44
          ID: 5136
          Credit: 88,562
          RAC: 0
          Message 4806 - Posted 30 Apr 2009 4:45:48 UTC

            not sure what happened here with broker_lb_test3_hb_t313__IGNORE_THE_REST_9385_5_0, but i just got home and rebooted the computer after a windows update and then the task just dies after something like a minute and 6 seconds.

            Error msg: -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005)

            The other one that took its place is running ok so far and the one before it is 23% into its work and is ok.

            Profile robertmiles

            Joined: Jan 13 09
            Posts: 79
            ID: 5137
            Credit: 233,290
            RAC: 1
            Message 4807 - Posted 1 May 2009 14:15:34 UTC

              Are you sure 1.64 was adequately tested before releasing it to Rosetta@home? I've barely had any 1.64 workunits under Ralph@home at all.

              Profile robertmiles

              Joined: Jan 13 09
              Posts: 79
              ID: 5137
              Credit: 233,290
              RAC: 1
              Message 4808 - Posted 2 May 2009 8:35:17 UTC - in response to Message 4807.

                Have Rosetta@home and Ralph@home switched roles in which of them tests new versions of applications first? I've already received several minirosetta 1.65 workunits from Rosetta@home, without seeing any sign that there have been any Ralph@home tests of that version at all.

                Profile robertmiles

                Joined: Jan 13 09
                Posts: 79
                ID: 5137
                Credit: 233,290
                RAC: 1
                Message 4809 - Posted 2 May 2009 8:50:05 UTC - in response to Message 4806.

                  not sure what happened here with broker_lb_test3_hb_t313__IGNORE_THE_REST_9385_5_0, but i just got home and rebooted the computer after a windows update and then the task just dies after something like a minute and 6 seconds.

                  Error msg: -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005)

                  The other one that took its place is running ok so far and the one before it is 23% into its work and is ok.


                  Did you remember to suspend BOINC during the Windows update and the reboot? I've recently seen something similar for a number of BOINC projects when I was unable to call up the BOINC manager program in order to suspend BOINC during a reboot.

                  Profile Paul D. Buck

                  Joined: Jan 14 09
                  Posts: 62
                  ID: 5139
                  Credit: 33,293
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 4810 - Posted 2 May 2009 8:57:19 UTC - in response to Message 4808.

                    Have Rosetta@home and Ralph@home switched roles in which of them tests new versions of applications first? I've already received several minirosetta 1.65 workunits from Rosetta@home, without seeing any sign that there have been any Ralph@home tests of that version at all.

                    INteresting... me too ... I wonder if they just screwed the version number where 1.65 is 1.64 with a new dress ...

                    svincent

                    Joined: Apr 4 08
                    Posts: 34
                    ID: 4182
                    Credit: 51,768
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 4811 - Posted 3 May 2009 4:22:56 UTC

                      A couple of failures of version 1.65 (doesn't seem to be a specific thread for it yet) on Mac apparently somewhere in task termination as it seemed to run for a normal length of time.

                      1436213
                      1436214

                      Crashed executable name: minirosetta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin
                      built using BOINC library version 6.5.0
                      Machine type Intel 80486 (32-bit executable)
                      System version: Macintosh OS 10.4.11 build 8S2167
                      Sat May 2 20:35:24 2009

                      Thread 0 Crashed:
                      0 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x00edd115 __ZN7utility7signals9SignalHubIvN4core12conformation7signals16DestructionEventEE11send_signalES5_ + 2353
                      1 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x00021b39 __ZN4core12conformation12ConformationD1Ev + 7373
                      2 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x000784c8 __ZN4core4pose4PoseD1Ev + 4652
                      3 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x004fc6a4 __ZN9protocols3jd214JobDistributor2goEN7utility7pointer10owning_ptrINS_5moves5MoverEEE + 1730
                      4 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x00b44a7b __ZN9protocols3jd219BOINCJobDistributor2goEN7utility7pointer10owning_ptrINS_5moves5MoverEEE + 41
                      5 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x0011fdc1 __ZN9protocols8abinitio11Broker_mainEv + 1543
                      6 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x0000469d _main + 2805
                      7 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x0000244e __start + 216
                      8 ...etta_1.65_i686-apple-darwin 0x00002375 start + 41

                      Profile feet1st

                      Joined: Mar 7 06
                      Posts: 312
                      ID: 1028
                      Credit: 110,522
                      RAC: 1
                      Message 4812 - Posted 4 May 2009 16:47:06 UTC - in response to Message 4810.

                        Have Rosetta@home and Ralph@home switched roles in which of them tests new versions of applications first? I've already received several minirosetta 1.65 workunits from Rosetta@home, without seeing any sign that there have been any Ralph@home tests of that version at all.

                        INteresting... me too ... I wonder if they just screwed the version number where 1.65 is 1.64 with a new dress ...


                        They had to correct the upload problems

                        If you go to the homepage of both Ralph and Rosetta and click the "applications" link, you can see it was posted to Ralph first.
                        ____________

                        Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta_1.64


                        Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                        Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                        Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                        Back to top ^