Rosetta_beta 4.0+

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta_beta 4.0+

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6542 - Posted: 23 Apr 2018, 15:53:57 UTC - in response to Message 6541.  

The application listing shows 32 Bit is supposed to work, it does NOT.

My question is the "Rosetta Mini" work units run without an issue, on both 32 bit and 64 bit, but the new "Rosetta" work units fail on the 32 bit. So I am asking again, what has changed to cause the problem?

Conan


Seems that no one of admins are interested of your issues..... :-(
ID: 6542 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 6543 - Posted: 24 Apr 2018, 12:01:25 UTC - in response to Message 6542.  
Last modified: 24 Apr 2018, 12:02:20 UTC

The application listing shows 32 Bit is supposed to work, it does NOT.

My question is the "Rosetta Mini" work units run without an issue, on both 32 bit and 64 bit, but the new "Rosetta" work units fail on the 32 bit. So I am asking again, what has changed to cause the problem?

Conan


Seems that no one of admins are interested of your issues..... :-(


Yes boboviz, you seem to be right.

I have this same message running over at Rosetta as well as here and I am getting the same response.

This issue was reported on the Rosetta forum back on the 1st of Feb 2018, and still no response and no fix has been forthcoming.

You try and help these projects as much as you can, but when you can't get reponses from the people running the projects then you have to say to yourself "Why Bother".

Conan
ID: 6543 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Admin
Project administrator

Send message
Joined: 15 Dec 17
Posts: 237
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 6546 - Posted: 24 Apr 2018, 22:55:58 UTC

Sorry all. I'll take a look into this 32bit issue. Looks like there's a ~14% fail rate. Is this just an XP issue? any specific windows versions?
ID: 6546 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6547 - Posted: 26 Apr 2018, 12:40:16 UTC

New app seems to be good on my S6..
ID: 6547 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6548 - Posted: 28 Apr 2018, 6:49:20 UTC - in response to Message 6547.  

New app seems to be good on my S6..



Today all errors...

<message>
process exited with code 255 (0xff, -1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: ../../projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/rosetta_android_beta_4.10_arm-android-linux-gnu @9res_cis_hydrophobic_nmethyl_c.10.2_0001.flags -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 3600 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1940326


File: src/utility/options/OptionCollection.cc:239
ERROR:

File: src/utility/options/OptionCollection.cc:443
ERROR:

File: src/utility/options/OptionCollection.cc:1324
Option matching -cyclic_peptide:n_methyl_positions not found in command line top-level context

</stderr_txt>
ID: 6548 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6553 - Posted: 21 May 2018, 20:36:16 UTC - in response to Message 6548.  

Screensaver crashes in this batch.
But wu seems to be ok, validated.
ID: 6553 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 6554 - Posted: 21 May 2018, 23:17:47 UTC
Last modified: 21 May 2018, 23:19:36 UTC

32 Bit Rosetta work units are still failing to run on my 32 bit XP Windows machine.

The older Rosetta Mini work units run without an issue.

Have had no response from Admin about this since April, and it is still not fixed.

The applications don't start as they have the following error

couldn't start app: CreateProcess() failed - (unknown error)

Conan
ID: 6554 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 6555 - Posted: 22 May 2018, 5:57:05 UTC
Last modified: 22 May 2018, 5:58:43 UTC

Something has chamged with this latest batch of work units, only getting 10% to 12% of the normal credit, just 29 credits for 6 hours work.

Example this work unit

Conan
ID: 6555 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6556 - Posted: 22 May 2018, 15:34:36 UTC - in response to Message 6555.  

Something has chamged with this latest batch of work units, only getting 10% to 12% of the normal credit, just 29 credits for 6 hours work.


That's strange. For my 2h wus i receive from 75 to 130 credits....
ID: 6556 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 6557 - Posted: 23 May 2018, 0:13:49 UTC
Last modified: 23 May 2018, 0:18:33 UTC

I just finished processing 24 work units and all of them have only given me around 30 credits each for 6 hour of work each.

That is 720 credits for 144 hours of processor time, that is 5 credits per hour.

What happened to the credit?

I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else.

Admin please take a look into this please.

Conan
ID: 6557 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6558 - Posted: 23 May 2018, 8:52:59 UTC - in response to Message 6557.  
Last modified: 23 May 2018, 8:53:50 UTC

I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else.

Admin please take a look into this please.


The latest admin post was at the beginning of December 2017, so i don't know how often they read the forum :-(
ID: 6558 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 6559 - Posted: 23 May 2018, 9:27:24 UTC - in response to Message 6558.  
Last modified: 23 May 2018, 9:30:04 UTC

I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else.

Admin please take a look into this please.


The latest admin post was at the beginning of December 2017, so i don't know how often they read the forum :-(


Well if it is affecting me then it could affecting others, so that is why I am letting them know what is going on.
After all this is their test project so they should be more aware what is happening here before they stuff up the main Rosetta project.

But as you said they are a bit slow around here in responding to our posts.

There was a post on the 24/4/18 saying they were going to look into the 32 bit failure rate issue, but nothing has happened and my work units still fail on 32 bit (only the Rosetta ones, the Rosetta Mini ones are fine).

Conan
ID: 6559 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6560 - Posted: 23 May 2018, 10:37:19 UTC - in response to Message 6559.  
Last modified: 23 May 2018, 10:37:55 UTC

There was a post on the 24/4/18 saying they were going to look into the 32 bit failure rate issue, but nothing has happened and my work units still fail on 32 bit (only the Rosetta ones, the Rosetta Mini ones are fine).


Uh, now i see that post. But i think the only one who can resolve your problem about 32 bit is Dekim (developer and debugger of the project).
P.S. I referred to dekim when i wrote "december 2017"
ID: 6560 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 362
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 6561 - Posted: 24 May 2018, 11:31:17 UTC
Last modified: 24 May 2018, 11:37:46 UTC

Just had 19 failures on an Linux 64 bit machine with this Error Process got signal 11

No idea why, they failed within a minute of starting.

They all downloaded with an estimated run time of 1 hour, my preferences are set for 6 hours.

See This WU for example

Conan
ID: 6561 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6562 - Posted: 24 May 2018, 11:57:50 UTC - in response to Message 6561.  

Just had 19 failures on an Linux 64 bit machine with this Error Process got signal 11


Different error for me on some wus (under Win10)
<message>
(unknown error) - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/rosetta_4.07_windows_x86_64.exe -run:protocol jd2_scripting -frag_weight_aligned 0.20 -max_registry_shift 6 @flags_T0531s1_pt__t000__1_C3_robetta -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip input_T0531s1_pt__t000__0_C3_robetta.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 3600 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1909519
Starting watchdog...
Watchdog active.


Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0000000000000000
ID: 6562 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 09
Posts: 82
Credit: 306,886
RAC: 0
Message 6563 - Posted: 25 May 2018, 0:07:39 UTC - in response to Message 6560.  
Last modified: 25 May 2018, 0:21:37 UTC

Looks like whoever wrote the message on 24/4/18 is still waiting for information on which versions of Windows were used for the 32 bit failures. If so, there's no point in complaining about lack of another message or fix until more people supply this information.

I just had a failure for Rosetta v4.07 windows_intelx86 under 64-bit Windows.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4826810

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
10.0.17134 Build 17134
ID: 6563 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 09
Posts: 82
Credit: 306,886
RAC: 0
Message 6565 - Posted: 25 May 2018, 12:24:48 UTC

More Error while computing, for v4.07 windows_intelx86:

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4828008
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00B1C0E8 write attempt to address 0x0FC2512C

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4834727
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838682
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839839
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00B1C0E8 write attempt to address 0x1614B12C

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839899
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839875
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps


Also a few for v4.07 windows_x86_64:

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4837014
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838794
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838713
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00007FF744AEA206 read attempt to address 0xFFFFFFFF

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838711
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x000001F42FECB1C0

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4841528
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps


And a v4.07 windows_x86_84 Validate error:

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838714
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps


But some of these same error messages occur for tasks that are Completed and validated, for example:

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838712
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839930
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps


64-bit Windows
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
10.0.17134 Build 17134
ID: 6565 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6566 - Posted: 25 May 2018, 12:45:38 UTC - in response to Message 6565.  

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4837014
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps

64-bit Windows
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
10.0.17134 Build 17134


+1
Some wus (4840262-4843208-etc) on Win10 64:
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps
ERROR:: Exit from: ..\..\..\src\protocols\hybridization\HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic.cc line: 676
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
ID: 6566 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
mmonnin

Send message
Joined: 6 Dec 16
Posts: 7
Credit: 231,741
RAC: 0
Message 6567 - Posted: 25 May 2018, 23:19:15 UTC
Last modified: 25 May 2018, 23:20:48 UTC

Quite a lot of this:
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4851782
<core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: ../../projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -run:protocol jd2_scripting -jumps::random_sheets 4 3 2 -jumps::pairing_file input_t000__0_C1/t000_.fasta.bbcontacts.jumps -frag_weight_aligned 0.10 @flags_T0953s2_trimmed_ivan_ss_for_hybridize -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip T0953s2_trimmed_ivan_ss_for_hybridize1.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 3600 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1882043
rosetta_4.07_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: loadlocale.c:129: _nl_intern_locale_data: Assertion `cnt < (sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME) / sizeof (_nl_value_type_LC_TIME[0]))' failed.
SIGABRT: abort called
Stack trace (17 frames):
[0x5efead0]
[0x5ffe380]
[0x607e517]
[0x60083a8]
[0x6002794]
[0x60027ee]
[0x6000f73]
[0x6001996]
[0x60007df]
[0x600020e]
[0x5f1d10e]
[0x5f1d73e]
[0x5f1707a]
[0x5f17202]
[0x412631]
[0x5fff8cc]
[0x610b97]
Exiting...
</stderr_txt>
]]>


And
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4850692
<core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process got signal 11</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: ../../projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/rosetta_4.07_i686-pc-linux-gnu -run:protocol jd2_scripting -jumps::random_sheets 4 3 2 -jumps::pairing_file input_t000__0_C1/t000_.fasta.bbcontacts.jumps -frag_weight_aligned 0.10 @flags_T0953s2_trimmed_ivan_ss_for_hybridize -silent_gz -mute all -out:file:silent default.out -in:file:boinc_wu_zip T0953s2_trimmed_ivan_ss_for_hybridize1.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 3600 -watchdog -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1882564
Starting watchdog...
Watchdog active.

</stderr_txt>
]]>


Over a 1/3 of tasks error or are invalid
ID: 6567 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 08
Posts: 592
Credit: 1,029,384
RAC: 47
Message 6568 - Posted: 26 May 2018, 13:24:26 UTC - in response to Message 6566.  
Last modified: 26 May 2018, 13:33:09 UTC


Some wus (4840262-4843208-etc) on Win10 64:
ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps
ERROR:: Exit from: ..\..\..\src\protocols\hybridization\HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic.cc line: 676
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out


Well, a lot of...
ID: 6568 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta_beta 4.0+



©2019 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org