OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher)
Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher)
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
Son Goku, No, I've got an aDSL connection that goes through an ethernet card in the computer. Networking was disabled in the CC on the last couple of WUs, but it was not disabled on the first several (even under the new CC). This was because I resumed the CPDN coupled WU, and want to see how things progress, without allowing it to report back if it goes bonckers/giving myself time to restore a backup of it. Is that a problem? |
|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
2 more went bad: FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1ptq__381_7_0 stderr out FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1r69__381_7_0 stderr out |
 Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 19 Feb 06 Posts: 37 Credit: 2,089 RAC: 0 |
I ditched this one: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=77761 Result: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=85591 I had it running for more than 3 hours at still about 1.5%. So I've started on a fresh one https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=79197, that looks more reasonable in time. [color=navy][b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b][/color] 
|
[B^S] sTrey Send message Joined: 15 Feb 06 Posts: 58 Credit: 15,430 RAC: 0 |
Yet another: wu 78584,result 86884 This is the 9th in a row, I think all with the same error. Had enough for now. |
|
Rom Walton (BOINC) Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 10 Mar 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 5,515 RAC: 0 |
Son Goku, Do you use a proxy server? The reason I ask is, in the stacktraces your machine is generating, it keeps saying that it is using exported symbols. Exported symbols are only used when the debugger fails to actually connect up to MS to download the needed symbol files. Right now the debugger isn't paying attention to the setting that are in BOINC, but I was hoping for better results for those with full time internet connections. I would like to figure out the problem is to see if I can programatically fix it. |
|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
I've got Windows firewall enabled... For the browser, I do have a local ad blocking proxy setup, but BOINC itself isn't setup to go through "local host: 8080", so don't suspect that should come into play. Given that BOINC itself is set for a direct connection out to the Internet, about the only 3 things I can think of are: - Windows firewall in Service Pack 2 set to enabled... Unfortunately, just blasting a whole through local security on my PC isn't much to my liking. Yes, I have experienced the shananagins from some script kiddies in the past :eek: Perhaps I could make an exception for a program or 2, in the local policies, but wouldn't just want to take PC security down... - About to expire on the current version but Kaspersky 6.0 Release Candidate. - networking disabled in BOINC itself at the time it's crashing. Though networking itself is up... |
|
Rom Walton (BOINC) Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 10 Mar 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 5,515 RAC: 0 |
Son Goku, If your willing, could you install: http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols/debuggers/dbg_x86_6.5.3.8.exe If the symbol problem goes away, then that means the installation program is writing some registry value I need to find. Thanks in advance. |
|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
OK, will do, and then will grab a couple more WUs... If per chance, it doesn't (lets keep fingers crossed), and it's a registry value, we could also try manually adding it through registry editor, as long as the specific key, and values and all are known. Edit: OK, it's installed, I rebooted (even though it didn't ask for one), and have 9 RALPH WUs, using the new 5.0 beta from the look of it... |
|
Robinski Send message Joined: 24 Mar 06 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,366 RAC: 0 |
Got another error HBLR_1.0_1di2_377_35 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=86781 Exit status -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005) *** UNHANDLED EXCEPTION **** Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00707A4A read attempt to address 0x0769FC54 See result for the rest of the info |
|
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 17 Feb 06 Posts: 54 Credit: 710 RAC: 0 |
Note. Version 5.00 of Resetta_beta is out, so I guess abort and recieve. Also Rom has requested if people could use the newer Boinc clients 5.4.x (as it aids in debugging) |
|
Robinski Send message Joined: 24 Mar 06 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,366 RAC: 0 |
Got another one: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=86795 FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1npsA_381_2_1 Exit status -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005) *** UNHANDLED EXCEPTION **** Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00707A4A read attempt to address 0x06F9F824 Was a Rosetta 4.99 on a 5.2.13 Boinc, To bad I am not able to do a Boinc Update from here. |
|
anders n Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 166 Credit: 131,419 RAC: 0 |
|
|
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 17 Feb 06 Posts: 54 Credit: 710 RAC: 0 |
Got another one: Hi, to make it easier for people to get to the link put [url]http://whatever[/url]around you link (without the spaces in the [url ][ / url] ) |
[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 54,039 RAC: 0 |
I’m currently crunching on HBLR_1.0_1di2_378_65_1 with program version 4.99 and it has been crunching on this for 8h 30 min now, however it is only 1.08% complete. Boinc manager claims that it will take an additional 17 hrs to complete, but that time keeps going up. 9 hrs to go 2% is a rather long time for this type of project. Should I abort this? ~TM Edit: I just noticed on another computer of mine, after 17h15m it is only 1.34% complete. The process name is HBLR_1.0_1ogw_375_58_1. Are these new projects supposed to take much longer than before? If so, then its ok, I was just wondering if there was some errant loop it was going into or if there is just that much more processing going on.  
|
|
anders n Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 166 Credit: 131,419 RAC: 0 |
I’m currently crunching on HBLR_1.0_1di2_378_65_1 with program version 4.99 and it has been crunching on this for 8h 30 min now, however it is only 1.08% complete. Boinc manager claims that it will take an additional 17 hrs to complete, but that time keeps going up. 9 hrs to go 2% is a rather long time for this type of project. Should I abort this? As long as the steps is counting I would let it run. Anders n |
|
[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 54,039 RAC: 0 |
darn 60 min limit on edits :P I noticed on another comp here at my work, that one has been processing for over 24 hrs and is only at 1.29 complete, and thats on a PD 2.8GHz...
|
|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
Well, so far under beta 5.0 beta, the HBLR_* and other WUs have completed successfully. So either the problem was nicked, at least for this comp, or well I'll increase the time setting in RALPH and see... |
|
rbpeake Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 19 Credit: 3,370 RAC: 0 |
Well, so far under beta 5.0 beta, the HBLR_* and other WUs have completed successfully. So either the problem was nicked, at least for this comp, or well I'll increase the time setting in RALPH and see... Two hour timing works fine for me with 5.0 beta. So far so good. I think a lot of the problems showed up earlier in the previous calculations (where it got stuck), so the fact that I completed two hours with no issues seems to be a good omen. Btw, how do I set my right margin on these forums? My right margin is way off the screen to the right, and it never was like that before. |
|
[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 54,039 RAC: 0 |
so it looks like i should abort and start on the 5.0 version.... ~TM |
|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
Yeah, 5.0 is what needs testing, though it shows up as 0 WUs ready to send... Anyhow, I increased the time setting to 4 hours (which is the default on Rosseta). At 1.5 hours in, the WU seems to be going OK on 5.0... Will check back latter. If it continues, I might increase the time increment again, for the next WU and see where it goes. I've got 5 WUs including the one it's working on, so a little room to play wrt where it might fault... |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher)
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org