Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.08
Author | Message |
---|---|
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0 |
Thanks in advance for posting errors! In this round, we're going to try to track the last sources of errors in Rosetta, with help from some more powerful backtracing. |
[AF>France>Est>Lorraine]Le Zam Send message Joined: 2 Mar 06 Posts: 9 Credit: 3,278 RAC: 0 |
Hello again, i have this problem : 30/04/2006 19:19:51|ralph@home|Computation for result JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE03_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0 finished 30/04/2006 19:19:53|ralph@home|Starting result JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE04_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0 using rosetta_beta version 508 30/04/2006 19:19:53|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE03_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE03_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>) What could i do ? |
[AF>France>Est>Lorraine]Le Zam Send message Joined: 2 Mar 06 Posts: 9 Credit: 3,278 RAC: 0 |
Hello again, i have this problem : An error again : 30/04/2006 22:27:32|ralph@home|Computation for result JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE04_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0 finished 30/04/2006 22:27:34|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE04_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE04_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_16_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>) |
doc :) Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 46 Credit: 4,437 RAC: 0 |
got that file xfer error on my first 5.08 unit too, the next 3 (2 different pcs) went ok. (was away the last 3 weeks, so my knowledge of what happened in that time is not the best :)) 30/04/2006 08:44:00|ralph@home|Computation for task JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE06_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_4_0 finished 30/04/2006 08:44:02|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE06_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_4_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>JUMP_RELAX_ALLBARCODE06_1tul_SAVE_ALL_OUT_463_4_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>) |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 251 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hello again, i have this problem : Rhiju commented on a similar error in This Post , but I am not certain yours is a Watchdog stop. The file errors are the same, and I know Rhiju had a post about that somewhere too, but I can't find it right now. He will pick this thread up again tomorrow if he does not catch it tonight sometime. My recollection is that this will self correct. Moderator9 RALPH@home FAQs RALPH@home Guidelines Moderator Contact |
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0 |
Hi, thanks for posting. I've noticed that these workunits -- which are testing a new science protocol -- are occasionally not producing outfiles, and I figured out why thanks to these first tests on ralph! Its not a watchdog problem, but something that will be easy to fix in the app. I'll fix the problem and re-test on ralph before these ever go to rosetta@home. In the meanwhile, I'll send out some other tests. Hello again, i have this problem : |
Hans Sveen Send message Joined: 17 Feb 06 Posts: 11 Credit: 386,241 RAC: 51 |
Hello! My 2 latest wu both crashed with exit code 1 (Incorrect function), the wu's are 88566(which also has crashed for someone else!) and 85760. Hope this will help You sort out the last? errors! With regards and thank You! Hans Sveen Oslo, Norway |
anders n Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 166 Credit: 131,419 RAC: 0 |
Do the WU still go by nstruct and not the user time setting? https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=101375 Anders n |
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
Ralph@home I think you have problems with the new 5.08 version. I just received 11 WU and within the first hour 8 of them had errored out with "Computation errors". The shortest ran for 1 minute 32 seconds the longest ran for 59 minutes and 57 seconds. I am running them on a AMD dual 848 computer using Linux (Ralph computer id 2601). Preferences set to leave in memory as this seems to have stopped errors that I was getting on the 28/29th April where a number of Rosetta and Ralph WU's errored out on 3 different machines. These WU come on my machine saying will take 8 hours 39 minutes to process, with only 3 left I doubt I will get anything (credit or sciece output) from these WU's as I expect all of them to fail. WU's that so far have failed are:- https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89629 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89630 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89653 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89654 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89656 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89664 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89665 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89696 Thank you. |
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0 |
Thanks Conan. IT looks like a problem with that workunit type; we're looking into it. Glad we tested these on ralph before on rosetta@home! Ralph@home I think you have problems with the new 5.08 version. |
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
You're welcome. of the 3 I have left 2 have so ran for over 2 hours 20 minutes and over 60%, so they may finish. We will wait and see. |
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
Lost another WU. That's 9 out of 11 that failed. 2 did finish though. The failed WU with "Computational Error' was https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89697 failed after almost 3 hours. WU 89649 and 89650 were both successful. |
Divide Overflow Send message Joined: 15 Feb 06 Posts: 12 Credit: 128,027 RAC: 0 |
v5.08 has generated mixed results on my Linux box. Although several WU’s completed successfully, I’ve also had several result in computational errors: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102100 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102101 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102102 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102103 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102372 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102373 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102374 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102375 |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 251 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
v5.08 has generated mixed results on my Linux box. Although several WU’s completed successfully, I’ve also had several result in computational errors: These results came from a Work Unit type that had a problem. See this post suggesting they be aborted. Moderator9 RALPH@home FAQs RALPH@home Guidelines Moderator Contact |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 19 Feb 06 Posts: 37 Credit: 2,089 RAC: 0 |
This one errored out: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=89670 (apparently for others also) Result: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102139 [color=navy][b]"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me[/b][/color] |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for Ralph 5.08
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org