Bug reports for 5.87

Author	Message
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0	Message 3517 - Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 2:49:59 UTC Thanks for continuing to post! It helps tremendously. ID: 3517 · Reply Quote

BigMike Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 63 Credit: 58,730 RAC: 0	Message 3518 - Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 15:16:03 UTC I suspect the answer is no, but do you want us to abort WU's from a previous version (in this case 5.85) when a new version comes out? ==Mike Don't believe everything you think. ID: 3518 · Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0	Message 3519 - Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 19:46:30 UTC - in response to Message 3518. Hi Mike: Please go ahead and let them run! I suspect the answer is no, but do you want us to abort WU's from a previous version (in this case 5.85) when a new version comes out? ==Mike ID: 3519 · Reply Quote

Pieface Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 64 Credit: 203,513 RAC: 0	Message 3520 - Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 22:42:37 UTC This one is kind of different: Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: 1776245 Can't seem to find a pairing inside database with aa1: g aa2: a edge1: W edge2: W orientation: P ERROR:: Exit from: .pose_rna_jumping.cc line: 457 wu 703300 ID: 3520 · Reply Quote

BigMike Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 63 Credit: 58,730 RAC: 0	Message 3521 - Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 22:49:52 UTC Just had a bunch of 5.87 WU's crash with addressing errors: 703156 703157 703158 703159 Lots of debug info in each of them. ==Mike Don't believe everything you think. ID: 3521 · Reply Quote

Pepo Send message Joined: 8 Sep 06 Posts: 104 Credit: 36,890 RAC: 0	Message 3523 - Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 0:40:44 UTC - in response to Message 3521. Just had a bunch of 5.87 WU's crash with addressing errors: [...] The same happened here. BTW, please take a look at my note concerning memory requirements in the 5.85 thread. Peter ID: 3523 · Reply Quote

Pepo Send message Joined: 8 Sep 06 Posts: 104 Credit: 36,890 RAC: 0	Message 3527 - Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 9:10:28 UTC One more similarly failed task 703110 (__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1zpy_-native__). This one differs a bit from the others. While the task are usually failing in few seconds to minutes, this one took 32 minutes. BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger output attached too. Peter ID: 3527 · Reply Quote