Message boards : Number crunching : CPU run time
Author | Message |
---|---|
Azurrio Send message Joined: 27 Jun 07 Posts: 12 Credit: 8,020 RAC: 0 |
So I was just wondering... Would it be better for RALPH to have a bigger cpu run time per WU? Is the default 1 hour run time enough for testing or would it be better for me to raise it up by few hours? I was just figuring that since this project is focusing on error detection etc., is it really useful to run the WU's longer than the deafault 1 hour? |
Pepo Send message Joined: 8 Sep 06 Posts: 104 Credit: 36,890 RAC: 0 |
So I was just wondering... ...and not only you... Would it be better for RALPH to have a bigger cpu run time per WU? Is the default 1 hour run time enough for testing or would it be better for me to raise it up by few hours? We were discussing this question two months ago in the Run time defaults thread, unluckily without any agreement or an official response from devs' side. The only known note is a one year old David Kim's comment: We would prefer lower run times so that results are returned quicker. Peter |
Azurrio Send message Joined: 27 Jun 07 Posts: 12 Credit: 8,020 RAC: 0 |
Ok, thanks Pepo, I missed that topic... Well, I guess I'm going to keep my run time at default to keep the WU flowing... Hope it detects all the errors in that time :) I would also presume that if the staff would want the WU's to run longer they would propaply raise the default run time... |
David Emigh Send message Joined: 6 Jan 08 Posts: 27 Credit: 26,482 RAC: 0 |
Bump In light of the recent difficulties with memory leaks in Rosetta Mini 1.1x, especially those leaks that took upwards of 20 hours to cause a failure, would it be appropriate to increase the default runtime? RALPH and Rosie sittin' in a tree, F - O - L - D - I - N - G! |
Pepo Send message Joined: 8 Sep 06 Posts: 104 Credit: 36,890 RAC: 0 |
In light of the recent difficulties with memory leaks in Rosetta Mini 1.1x, especially those leaks that took upwards of 20 hours to cause a failure, would it be appropriate to increase the default runtime? This is possibly not the case, but IMO the events prove the necessity of rather broad variance of used runtimes - not only the short ones (for fast turnaround of tasks and apps as possibly the devs' main goal) but also the mid and long(est) ones to test the tasks' and apps' stability. Peter |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU run time
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org