minirosetta 2.10

Author	Message
mtyka Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 19 Mar 08 Posts: 79 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 5112 - Posted: 6 Apr 2010, 0:18:02 UTC Another internal bugfix. A feature had been accidentally switched off. Please post bug reports here, thanks ! ID: 5112 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 905 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5113 - Posted: 6 Apr 2010, 10:53:59 UTC - in response to Message 5112. Last modified: 6 Apr 2010, 10:56:29 UTC A new version? No wu, no debug.... :-) ID: 5113 · Reply Quote

coturnix Send message Joined: 5 Jan 10 Posts: 9 Credit: 196,185 RAC: 0	Message 5114 - Posted: 7 Apr 2010, 20:00:46 UTC Lots of ha_notyr29Jan2010_3gbn_****_ProteinInterfaceDesign_6Apr2010_14587_1_0 work units fail with a segmentation violation on x86_64 Linux, e.g. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1782249 ID: 5114 · Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0	Message 5115 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010, 2:47:20 UTC - in response to Message 5114. Last modified: 8 Apr 2010, 2:53:05 UTC Lots of ha_notyr29Jan2010_3gbn_****_ProteinInterfaceDesign_6Apr2010_14587_1_0 work units fail with a segmentation violation on x86_64 Linux, e.g. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1782249 Same error on my Windows machines (1 error on each) See 1783837 1783803 ID: 5115 · Reply Quote

apohawk Send message Joined: 1 Dec 09 Posts: 5 Credit: 272,237 RAC: 0	Message 5116 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010, 6:49:47 UTC - in response to Message 5115. Last modified: 8 Apr 2010, 7:03:59 UTC 7gbnnotyr_3gbn work units tend to behave weird. They kinda get stuck 10 minutes to completion. Then it either jumps to 100% or stays at ~10 minutes to finish, but the progress bar is slowly advancing. I had pref time set to 4 hours, then i reduced it to 2 hours, but the magic 10 minutes is still the same. Also i had one task (7gbnnotyr_3gbn) in that "10 minutes" phase, which i pressed "show graphics", which probably broke it. It was on model 873, step 187500 or 196500, something like that. 2 hours later it was on model 873, step 174500 os something like that, but continued slowly going up. I aborted this task. This ha_notyr caught compute error. On www it says it was running for ~10 minutes, but in BOINC Manager it was shown as running for over 6 hours. It happened overnight, so i can't be sure what exactly happened there. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1782992 OS: WinXP 64 CPU: phenomII x4 945, NOT overclocked RAM: 8GB BOINC Manager was 6.10.37, now i updated to 6.10.43 to see if it helps anything ;) ID: 5116 · Reply Quote

apohawk Send message Joined: 1 Dec 09 Posts: 5 Credit: 272,237 RAC: 0	Message 5117 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010, 7:10:21 UTC - in response to Message 5116. New issue. I have BM set to keep applications in memory when switching. Now during the BM update the boinc service is shut down. During that shutdown all those remaining in memory applications are being closed. 2 of minirosetta_2.10_windows_x86_64.exe did not close during boinc shutdown and became orphaned in the system. Unfortunately i can't tell which WU they were crunching. ID: 5117 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 905 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5118 - Posted: 8 Apr 2010, 20:14:33 UTC 1783989 Exit status -529697949 (0xffffffffe06d7363) Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Out Of Memory (C++ Exception) (0xe06d7363) at address 0x753C9617 ID: 5118 · Reply Quote

Billy Send message Joined: 29 Jan 07 Posts: 14 Credit: 7,865 RAC: 0	Message 5120 - Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 18:35:47 UTC Last modified: 16 Apr 2010, 18:36:03 UTC One task is running at 270 MB of real memory. Seems like a lot. Mac Core Duo OSX 10.4 ID: 5120 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 905 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5121 - Posted: 16 Apr 2010, 19:14:59 UTC - in response to Message 5120. 270mb? Not a lot of memory... In the past the wus used almost 900 mb of ram ID: 5121 · Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0	Message 5122 - Posted: 17 Apr 2010, 8:30:41 UTC This task is using 361 MB of RAM which is fairly normal, what is not normal is the fact that the WU has been running for 22.12 Hours on a 6 hour preference has only gotten to 26.199% and has 32 Hours to go. I am going to abort this WU This WU ID: 5122 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 905 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5123 - Posted: 20 Apr 2010, 15:30:10 UTC An "old style" validate error on 1792938 ID: 5123 · Reply Quote