Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta mini beta and/or android 3.61-3.83
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 12 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
rjs5 Send message Joined: 5 Jul 15 Posts: 22 Credit: 135,787 RAC: 2,494 |
I would exit BOINC and restart it in that situation rather than aborting them. Is that because there is the possibility for them to complete and you get the information about the run and the cruncher gets the credit? |
dcdc Send message Joined: 15 Aug 06 Posts: 27 Credit: 90,652 RAC: 0 |
I would exit BOINC and restart it in that situation rather than aborting them. Yes exactly, although flagging it up as an issue is useful as it obviously shouldn't happen and something needs fixing (whether that's in Rosetta or BOINC or elsewhere). |
Valter Send message Joined: 11 Aug 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 95,627 RAC: 0 |
Many thanks. I did that yesterday (exited BOINC and restarted it) and it worked. The jobs were concluded, uploaded and received credit. Immediately after I restarted BOINC, the elapsed time of both jobs decreased from 5 hours to about 56 minutes. Two of them also decreased progress from 100% to about 86-88%. And they received credit as if one hour had been elapsed. But they were concluded. Many thanks again. Valter. |
mugnaio [TNAA] Send message Joined: 17 Sep 15 Posts: 1 Credit: 27,355 RAC: 0 |
hello, I don't know if this issue is relevant or worthless, so i'm posting it: tonight I got 13 WU with app release 3.67 and 1 of these workunits completed successfully but failed validation with this message "workunit error - check skipped". WU is: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=3054528. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Now Rosetta Mini Beta 3.65 I'm little confused about all those versions :-) |
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0 |
Now Rosetta Mini Beta 3.65 Me too! just kidding. The versioning has been a bit inconsistent because I've just been updating the linux versions mainly. I did the recent update just have the beta and non-beta versions matched up. |
Senilix Send message Joined: 25 Apr 13 Posts: 3 Credit: 18,266 RAC: 0 |
And again, nothing but validate errors on the new batch 3.65 T0559_indexed_frags_test_... WUs of any other brand validate just fine. There's a bug in your validator IMHO. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
And again, nothing but validate errors on the new batch 3.65 T0559_indexed_frags_test_... Windows, linux or mac? My 2 win has no problem There's a bug in your validator IMHO. There are a lot of requests to upgrade their OLD servers... |
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0 |
And again, nothing but validate errors on the new batch 3.65 T0559_indexed_frags_test_... Please ignore the validation errors. I suspect it's just because the jobs are running faster than allowed on your computer for this specific test case. I'll switch to a better test case with longer run times per model. |
Senilix Send message Joined: 25 Apr 13 Posts: 3 Credit: 18,266 RAC: 0 |
Thank you very much. So my computer is too fast for these WUs :) I'm looking forward to the new longer WUs. Keep on the good work! |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
No new test?? |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
What's new with 3.68? Bugfix? New protocols? |
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0 |
3.68 uses the latest Rosetta source. It includes new protocols, for example, a new cyclic peptide modeling method, and also a newly optimized energy function that improves scientific benchmarks. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Ok, new graphic is pretty but seems to be no "coherent". 1) All blue, included "accepted energy" box. Not an optimal solution, imho. 2) Blue only simulations boxes (searching, accepted, low energy) and return to black for others boxes. |
rjs5 Send message Joined: 5 Jul 15 Posts: 22 Credit: 135,787 RAC: 2,494 |
3.68 uses the latest Rosetta source. It includes new protocols, for example, a new cyclic peptide modeling method, and also a newly optimized energy function that improves scientific benchmarks. I would like to build a binary and test environment somewhat similar to yours and do some performance analysis. I can guess and experiment to find an environment that works or you can guide my efforts to complement the work you guys are doing and would like done. I am currently using the November source bundle (rosetta_src_2015.39.58186_bundle.tgz) on a RHEL7.2 clone with the standard gcc/g++ 4.8.4. I have been able to build the "bin" default, debug and release versions and with the "extras=static". The only problem so far is the static scripts generate an error in the TEST scripts caused by a conservative "-Werror" option. I can upgrade/downgrade software versions easily if you prefer. If there is no need for Software Performance Engineer, then I also have some time for other tasks too. Testing, validation, bug isolation ... ? |
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0 |
If you have completed the bin build then you can run the various tests, integration, profile, etc in Rosetta/main/tests. I'm not familiar with the source bundle that you have, is it the academic release? Feel free to contact me via email dekim at u.washington.edu |
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
Got this error but the work unit was valid <stderr_txt> or/Parser should have replaced DummyMover.) ERROR: false ERROR:: Exit from: ......srcappspublicboincminirosetta.cc line: 96 DummyMover::apply() should never have been called! (JobDistributor/Parser should have replaced DummyMover.) This line was repeated dozens of times See Result 3473010 Conan |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Got this error but the work unit was valid Same error, but my wus are "validation error" :-( |
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0 |
I'm looking into this odd error. Can anyone who is experiencing these errors do me a favor and reset their project (mainly to just clear the project data and slot directories). This error can happen if the application is using an older database version but this shouldn't happen since the new database is packaged with the new application. thanks! |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 908 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
I'm looking into this odd error. Can anyone who is experiencing these errors do me a favor and reset their project (mainly to just clear the project data and slot directories) To be clear, i detach and re-attach the project....you've reached the daily quota of 6 wus :-( I have to wait 12 hours to try new wus |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta mini beta and/or android 3.61-3.83
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org