Rosetta_beta 4.0+
Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Rosetta_beta 4.0+
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
The application listing shows 32 Bit is supposed to work, it does NOT. Yes boboviz, you seem to be right. I have this same message running over at Rosetta as well as here and I am getting the same response. This issue was reported on the Rosetta forum back on the 1st of Feb 2018, and still no response and no fix has been forthcoming. You try and help these projects as much as you can, but when you can't get reponses from the people running the projects then you have to say to yourself "Why Bother". Conan |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
New app seems to be good on my S6.. |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
New app seems to be good on my S6.. Today all errors... <message> |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Screensaver crashes in this batch. But wu seems to be ok, validated. |
|
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
32 Bit Rosetta work units are still failing to run on my 32 bit XP Windows machine. The older Rosetta Mini work units run without an issue. Have had no response from Admin about this since April, and it is still not fixed. The applications don't start as they have the following error couldn't start app: CreateProcess() failed - (unknown error) Conan |
|
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
Something has chamged with this latest batch of work units, only getting 10% to 12% of the normal credit, just 29 credits for 6 hours work. Example this work unit Conan |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Something has chamged with this latest batch of work units, only getting 10% to 12% of the normal credit, just 29 credits for 6 hours work. That's strange. For my 2h wus i receive from 75 to 130 credits.... |
|
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
I just finished processing 24 work units and all of them have only given me around 30 credits each for 6 hour of work each. That is 720 credits for 144 hours of processor time, that is 5 credits per hour. What happened to the credit? I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else. Admin please take a look into this please. Conan |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else. The latest admin post was at the beginning of December 2017, so i don't know how often they read the forum :-( |
|
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
I have helped this project since it started but at this pay rate I rather help someone else. Well if it is affecting me then it could affecting others, so that is why I am letting them know what is going on. After all this is their test project so they should be more aware what is happening here before they stuff up the main Rosetta project. But as you said they are a bit slow around here in responding to our posts. There was a post on the 24/4/18 saying they were going to look into the 32 bit failure rate issue, but nothing has happened and my work units still fail on 32 bit (only the Rosetta ones, the Rosetta Mini ones are fine). Conan |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
There was a post on the 24/4/18 saying they were going to look into the 32 bit failure rate issue, but nothing has happened and my work units still fail on 32 bit (only the Rosetta ones, the Rosetta Mini ones are fine). Uh, now i see that post. But i think the only one who can resolve your problem about 32 bit is Dekim (developer and debugger of the project). P.S. I referred to dekim when i wrote "december 2017" |
|
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
Just had 19 failures on an Linux 64 bit machine with this Error Process got signal 11 No idea why, they failed within a minute of starting. They all downloaded with an estimated run time of 1 hour, my preferences are set for 6 hours. See This WU for example Conan |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Just had 19 failures on an Linux 64 bit machine with this Error Process got signal 11 Different error for me on some wus (under Win10) <message> |
|
robertmiles Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 103 Credit: 331,865 RAC: 0 |
Looks like whoever wrote the message on 24/4/18 is still waiting for information on which versions of Windows were used for the 32 bit failures. If so, there's no point in complaining about lack of another message or fix until more people supply this information. I just had a failure for Rosetta v4.07 windows_intelx86 under 64-bit Windows. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4826810 Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 10.0.17134 Build 17134 |
|
robertmiles Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 103 Credit: 331,865 RAC: 0 |
More Error while computing, for v4.07 windows_intelx86: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4828008 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00B1C0E8 write attempt to address 0x0FC2512C https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4834727 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838682 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839839 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00B1C0E8 write attempt to address 0x1614B12C https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839899 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839875 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps Also a few for v4.07 windows_x86_64: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4837014 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838794 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838713 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00007FF744AEA206 read attempt to address 0xFFFFFFFF https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838711 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x000001F42FECB1C0 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4841528 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps And a v4.07 windows_x86_84 Validate error: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838714 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps But some of these same error messages occur for tasks that are Completed and validated, for example: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4838712 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4839930 ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps 64-bit Windows Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 10.0.17134 Build 17134 |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4837014 +1 Some wus (4840262-4843208-etc) on Win10 64: ERROR: HybridizeFoldtreeDynamic: failed to build fold tree from cuts and jumps ERROR:: Exit from: ......srcprotocolshybridizationHybridizeFoldtreeDynamic.cc line: 676 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out |
|
mmonnin Send message Joined: 6 Dec 16 Posts: 10 Credit: 392,615 RAC: 0 |
Quite a lot of this: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4851782 <core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version> And https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=4850692 <core_client_version>7.9.3</core_client_version> Over a 1/3 of tasks error or are invalid |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Well, a lot of... |
|
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 913 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
And others (4852300, 4852284, etc) with these errors: <message> - Unhandled Exception Record - - Unhandled Exception Record - |
|
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
[quote]Looks like whoever wrote the message on 24/4/18 is still waiting for information on which versions of Windows were used for the 32 bit failures. If so, there's no point in complaining about lack of another message or fix until more people supply this information. [Quote] G'Day Robert, I was not complaining, I was bringing back to the forefront of awareness a problem which dates back to at least the beginging of Feburary (2018). 32 Bit Rosetta work units have been failing for many months, but no fix yet. They fail on both Ralph and Rosetta, as the administrators of the Rosetta project have not used their test project Ralph properly before releasing work on the main project. The problems are supposed to be fixed here first then released to Rosetta. Other problems were listed here about Linux work units as well but still they went ahead and released work on Rosetta. So now they have a lot more people complaing (over at Rosetta) about failing work units (32 bit, 64 bit, Windows and Linux) because they did not seem to take heed of what the test project was telling them. We try to help these people but if they don't take action on what we report then the results will be poor. So just trying to help the Project, as I have been doing since the test project was launched. Have a great day. Conan |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Rosetta_beta 4.0+
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org