1)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug report for Rosetta version 5.97
(Message 4137)
Posted 22 Jun 2008 by ![]() Post: This one threw a "Compute Error" at 0 seconds: t419N_autoalign_IGNORE_THE_REST_renumbered_4293_3_1 The error message was: Maximum disk usage exceeded |
2)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug report for Minirosetta version 1.29
(Message 4135)
Posted 21 Jun 2008 by ![]() Post: None of my crunchers has yet been assigned a 1.29 workunit. I will be sure to report as soon as I see that I have finished one. |
3)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.26 bug thread
(Message 4094)
Posted 31 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Validate error here at 3700+ seconds: 2oq2a_14_BOINC_CASP8_LOOPRELAX-2oq2a_14-_4064_10_1 The stderr_txt output consists of the painfully familiar many thousands of repetitions of the phrase "Error writing At this point, I am 2/5 on mini 1.26 |
4)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.96
(Message 4093)
Posted 31 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Compute error at 13 seconds: file_xfer_error ERROR:: Unable to determine sequence length from pdb file BAK1lcj_loop_model_biased_clusterCC00_4096_6_0 |
5)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.26 bug thread
(Message 4089)
Posted 29 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Validate error at 2800+ seconds resultid=1018498 1/3 on Mini 1.26 at this point. Which is to say, I have had one success. |
6)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.26 bug thread
(Message 4087)
Posted 29 May 2008 by ![]() Post: This one errored out in a little over 17 seconds resultid=1016809 My first mini 1.26 |
7)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.25 bug thread
(Message 4071)
Posted 26 May 2008 by ![]() Post: {...} but stderr out is full of "error writing" message. I had one like that on Rosetta t393_looprelax_round1_fullatom_relax_aaT0393_2I76A_8_0001_3559_429_1 It was a mini 1.24 application, mentioned here only because of the similar obscene profusion of the line: "Error writing" BTW: I was the wingman on the task linked above. The original recipient had the same luck. |
8)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.25 bug thread
(Message 4062)
Posted 25 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Success on 3/4 of the Mini 1.25 workunits I've completed so far. Here is the exception: resultid=1015465 On the tasks that are successful, the stderr_txt block often contains rather dire looking warnings, frequently repeated an inordinate number of times. CreateFile error 32 when trying set file timeseems quite popular, in one case repeating no less than 65 times in the same message. |
9)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.24 bug thread
(Message 4054)
Posted 22 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Successes on 3/4 so far. Here is a link to the problem child: resultid=972013 The above crashed for my wingman also. |
10)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.23 bug thread
(Message 4049)
Posted 21 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Two errors to report, which may be task specific rather than application level problems, as Mini 1.23 is successful 17/19 for me, so far: resultid=968567 <message> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>long_fa_dis-2acy_-test_2008-5-6_3731_7_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> resultid=970298 <message> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>long_fa_dis-1urnA-test_2008-5-6_3731_8_1_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> |
11)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.22 bug thread
(Message 4038)
Posted 20 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Huge string of validate errors. Every Mini 1.22 I have received has failed. 16 and counting at this point. One failure for hostid=13643 resultid=962482 - Seven failures for hostid=12457 resultid=966751 resultid=966598 resultid=966139 resultid=965938 resultid=964921 resultid=964008 resultid=963118 ------- Eight failures for hostid=12418 resultid=966638 resultid=966535 resultid=966187 resultid=965749 resultid=965163 resultid=965042 resultid=964962 resultid=963860 -------- |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU run time
(Message 4032)
Posted 17 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Bump In light of the recent difficulties with memory leaks in Rosetta Mini 1.1x, especially those leaks that took upwards of 20 hours to cause a failure, would it be appropriate to increase the default runtime? |
13)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.20 bug thread
(Message 4026)
Posted 15 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Same error as Dr Who Fan received: ERROR: NANs occurred in hbonding! I was the wingman. Both this host, and the first to get this task failed in less than 7 seconds. The host that received this error has successfully completed mini 1.20 work units previously, so this may be task specific. |
14)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 4009)
Posted 8 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Three errors to report, all on different computers, but have the same error message: WARNING: Override of option -out:nstruct sets a different value resultid=951829 resultid=951656 resultid=951591 |
15)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 4006)
Posted 8 May 2008 by ![]() Post: These -psipred tasks seem to be problematic: resultid=950853 I was the wingman. Both computers errored instantly. |
16)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 4005)
Posted 8 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Here's a new one: ERROR: Cannot open 9-mer fragment library file: 9merfile I was the wingman. Neither computer lasted even a full second. |
17)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.96
(Message 4002)
Posted 7 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Another loop error exit: ERROR:: Exit from: .loop_relax.cc line: 1745 I was the wingman. Both computers kicked this one out in less than 40 seconds. |
18)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 4001)
Posted 7 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Here's another error like the last several reported in this thread: ERROR: Option matching -psipred_ss2:1tul_.fa_max_dis_9.psipred_ss2 not found in command line top-level context I was the wingman. Both computers kicked this one out in 0 seconds. |
19)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 3995)
Posted 6 May 2008 by ![]() Post: Another compute error to report, although this one needed only 20 seconds to error out. |
20)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 3993)
Posted 5 May 2008 by ![]() Post: A compute error to report on 2900+ seconds of CPU time. I was the wingman on this task, and I got the same error as the first person who attempted it. |
©2025 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org