1)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.96
(Message 3835)
Posted 22 Mar 2008 by Rhiju Post: A small update, mainly tests of a new mode for modeling RNA structures with experimental constraints. Let us know if you see anything fishy! |
2)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.90/5.91
(Message 3569)
Posted 21 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: I didn't see the message in, e.g., the stderr -- where is it showing up? This isn't really a bug, but more of an item that Rosetta@Home users will probably go nuts about. I suspect it has to do with the new BOINC API. |
3)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.90/5.91
(Message 3568)
Posted 21 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: The linux executable should behave better now. Thanks to Conan others for the "front-lines" warning from ralph! Let us know how its working. It would appear that no matter what time you have in your preferances it will not be adhered to. |
4)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.90/5.91
(Message 3558)
Posted 20 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Hi Conan: Thanks, this is interesting and unexpected! I forgot to mention in the home page that we also updated the version of the BOINC api that is used to compile Rosetta@home, in anticipation of a new release of the BOINC client software (6.0). We'll look into whether this causes a problem with the reporting of % complete, etc. I am currently running 3 work units of the "1px8" variety. |
5)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.90/5.91
(Message 3554)
Posted 20 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Update to 5.90! Keep us posted on weirdness. |
6)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.89
(Message 3553)
Posted 20 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Thanks for the screenshot -- we're looking into this, but the craziness may not be fixed for a few updates... Noticed graphic bug in accepted energy bar in this work unit: |
7)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.89
(Message 3536)
Posted 15 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Hi: yup, they're going to take a while... when we apply filters (to allow premature exits for unpromising model), they will average 2-3 hours per model. But these are totally worth it! wowzers, takes a while to run these guys thru. I just finished my first, took almost six hours (21,240 secs)to do one decoy on my p-4 2.8ghz Win-xp box. I'm gonna have to up my preferences if they are all going to run this long! |
8)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.88
(Message 3531)
Posted 12 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Yea, we're flooding ralph with a bunch of test jobs for this workunit -- we can't figure out why its crashing. Yet. Bear with us! We'll probably do another update later today if we can figure out the fix. Hmmm... another addressing crash. |
9)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.87
(Message 3519)
Posted 11 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Hi Mike: Please go ahead and let them run! I suspect the answer is no, but do you want us to abort WU's from a previous version (in this case 5.85) when a new version comes out? |
10)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.87
(Message 3517)
Posted 11 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: Thanks for continuing to post! It helps tremendously. |
11)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.84
(Message 3506)
Posted 6 Dec 2007 by Rhiju Post: We're looking into it -- I just contacted Rob, who can probably give you an update on these tests. 5 x the same error as BigMike mentioned ("Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1), ERROR:: Exit from: .fragments.cc line: 465"): results 689005, 688961, 688506, 688423, 689759, named "1****_BOINC_ABINITIO_BEST25_VF_SCORE3-1*--1****-vf__2657_*_*". |
12)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.84
(Message 3467)
Posted 16 Nov 2007 by Rhiju Post: Thanks for posting! |
13)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
bug report for version 5.81
(Message 3466)
Posted 16 Nov 2007 by Rhiju Post: fixed! Thanks! The whole WU 586085 failed, 2 results because of "WU download error: couldn't get input files: calcium_1emn.pdb.gz, error_code -200" (Windows) and res 660290 because of "SIGSEGV: segmentation violation" (Linux). |
14)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.78
(Message 3345)
Posted 7 Sep 2007 by Rhiju Post: Hey everybody, thanks for the support! This is a particularly crazy time because we are in the midst of the CAPRI competition to predict protein-protein interactions, and we'd really like to run some workunits. There are two "puzzles" that we've been given and they're both pretty cool, related to the interactions of some important signaling proteins (the so-called GTPases and the plexins). We just got the ability to queue stuff to ralph so you'll start seeing some jobs. By the way, the first round that I sent out had a silly error (which I just fixed); sorry about that. Looking forward to getting ralph and rosetta running smoothly again! Hi all :) |
15)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3319)
Posted 12 Aug 2007 by Rhiju Post: Hi: Yea, I was putting up info on new apps when ralph crashed for a few hours -- putting up some updates now. Also, thanks for the post of a job that's going on too long for the watchdog. Here is one. |
16)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3314)
Posted 11 Aug 2007 by Rhiju Post: Hmm, I didn't think about the heartbeart or watchdog issue. Good point. So far I haven't seen any early exit due to that problem, but I'll keep an eye out for it! In this type of vu "157d__BOINC_MINIMIZE_NOFLAGS_RNA_ABINITIO-157d_-_2295_834_0" the steps, accepted energi and accepted RMSD does not change after about 5500 steps in each model. But you can se the grafics move and the new dots comming in the right corner. |
17)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3312)
Posted 8 Aug 2007 by Rhiju Post: Thanks, we're not going to send those out to Rosetta@home! Two that have failed with the same error |
18)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3306)
Posted 7 Aug 2007 by Rhiju Post: Thanks we noted these, and they'll be tested again on ralph with a fix before getting sent out to Rosetta@home. 3 more, these ones on a Windows machine |
19)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.72-5.76
(Message 3290)
Posted 22 Jul 2007 by Rhiju Post: Thanks for continuing to post... things have overall been pretty quiet, and ralph has been chugging along great. This might be our last update before we update the real rosetta@home app, so I'm hoping that this looks good! |
20)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.71
(Message 3289)
Posted 22 Jul 2007 by Rhiju Post: Sorry about this -- the shaded sphere view is experimental. Glad to hear that the ribbons view still works fine. When displaying the graphic and pressing "B" three times to display the view with the balls, if you rotate the image 180 degrees to the left, you end up displaying the shaded portion of the sun effect. Seems the orientation of the sun should probably be fixed relative to the viewer of the graphic, so all the windows would always show the sun in the upper right, even if you rotate one of the images. |
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org