Posts by Path7

41) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.96 (Message 3979) Posted 2 May 2008 by Path7 Post: Had this error message yesterday: Task ID 941583 Name sol5__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_ONLY-sol5_-lowres_dock_-dock_1452__3547_1_0 Workunit 835975 Created 1 May 2008 3:58:35 UTC Sent 1 May 2008 4:00:26 UTC Received 1 May 2008 5:45:15 UTC Server state Over. Outcome Client error. Client state Compute error. Exit status -185 (0xffffffffffffff47) Computer ID 12413 Report deadline 5 May 2008 4:00:26 UTC CPU time 0 stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Can't link input file </message> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 0 Granted credit 0 application version 5.96 Have a nice day, Path7.
42) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.15 bug thread (Message 3966) Posted 23 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: My first 1.15 ran fine on Ubuntu 7.10 x86, Outcome: Success 2ci2I_BOINC_ABINITIO_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-9-S3-3—2ci2I-_3521_44_0 Have a nice day, Path7.
43) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.13 bug thread (Message 3943) Posted 21 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: Running Linux, Boinc 5.10.45 this WU failed. mini_abinitio-1vie_-test_2008-2-6_3310_79_0 process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) ERROR: Cannot open file 1vie.pdb ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/io/pdb/pose_io.cc line: 157 called boinc_finish Have a nice day, Path7.
44) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.13 bug thread (Message 3928) Posted 19 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello Dev's & Tench's, Running Windows XP & Boinc 5.10.45 I had two times a Validate error: <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> WARNING: Override of option -out:nstruct sets a different value can not open 1-mer fragment library file: none # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200 Task ID: 920921 & 921439 Another cruncher had the same error before on the second WU I mention. Have I good day, Path7.
45) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.13 bug thread (Message 3919) Posted 17 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: Thanks, the Minirosetta 1.13 has successfully run on my Linux-box (Ubuntu 7.10 x86) and ended valid. Thanks again for your efforts. Path7.
46) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.12 bug thread (Message 3909) Posted 15 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: The new version (v1.12) is now released. Post bugs here! Hello James, I'm sorry I have to tell you that 2 Minirosetta's v.1.12 errored out on my PC. Task ID 917137 & Task ID 917106 I'm using Boinc 5.10.45, Ubuntu 7.10, one-core AMD sempron 3000+, 1.8 G Hz., 1.4 GB RAM. Edit: The 2 v1.12 had the same error I had before on v1.10 & 1.11, running Linux. Have a nice day, Path7.
47) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 1.12 bug thread (Message 3906) Posted 15 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello all, Allowed work on Linux x86 and also received a Minirosetta 1.11. I hope http://ralph.bakerlab.org/apps.php will be up to date when the 1.12 are actually available. Path7.
48) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Rosetta Mini Versions 1.+ (Message 3884) Posted 11 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: We've tracked down the linux problem and think it has to do with the boinc libraries and not the mini executable. Hopefully update v. 1.12 will fix this Hello Robert, Many thanks for the update. I'm looking forward to the Linux MiniRosetta 1.12. Have a nice day, Path7.
49) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Rosetta Mini Versions 1.+ (Message 3876) Posted 10 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello all, For the third day I've downloaded a Ralph WU and tried to let it crunch on my Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) computer. The Rosetta mini 1.10 again error-ed out with process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255), zip.ZIP error, as mentioned above. I can imagine the tench's are quiet busy these days, however it would nice to see a announcement to tell us Linux users when a reliable (Linux-)WU can be downloaded. I'm interested in what Wu's will come up the next days, Path7.
50) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Rosetta Mini Versions 1.+ (Message 3849) Posted 8 Apr 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello, thanks for warning, Also having the process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255). Computer ID 13238, AMD Sempron 3000+, Ubuntu 7.10, Boinc 5.10.45. I've reset the project after 2 failed WU's, with no result at all. After 4 failed WU's I've decided to temporally stop downloading new Ralph work. Edit: I've rebooted my dual-boot machine and now running Windows XP-home, Boinc 5.10.45, (still Sempron 3000+). The Rosetta Mini 1.10 has already crunched 10 minutes, much longer than on Linux. I guess the lately reported errors are a Linux application issue. Path7.
51) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.96 (Message 3841) Posted 26 Mar 2008 by Path7 Post: this was in rosetta..... http://caesar1987.px2.biz/subfolder/mix/wtf.jpg Hello caesar1987, Wondering whether this is an exception to the rule or a common problem. I've only received non-symmetric 5.96's at R@h so far. Have a nice day, Path7.
52) Message boards : Feedback : Memory usage MiniR 1.09 graphics (Message 3836) Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello all, From the last MiniRosetta 1.09 my computer ran, I was reading the memory usage of the MiniRosetta graphics. I was surprised to see that it was using 10 % CPU in Windows Task Manager. Well I need to tell my computer uses the ”Via/SG3 Unichrome Pro IGP” embedded graphics, which uses the CPU for its calculations. I'm using a one core AMD sempron 3000+ 1.8 G Hz, 1.4 GB Ram. I'm wondering if someone else looked for the memory usage of the MiniRosetta graphics, to make (any) comparison. Have a nice day, Path7.
53) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Rosetta Mini Versions 1.+ (Message 3832) Posted 18 Mar 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello to all readers, My last 1.09: WU score13_hb_envtest62_A_1scjB_3394_2757_0 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=837840 ran fine & validated ok, however the message rapport from Boinc showed this: 19-3-2008 0:14:28\|ralph@home\|Resuming task score13_hb_envtest62_A_1scjB_3394_2757_0 using minirosetta version 109 19-3-2008 0:19:43\|ralph@home\|[error] minirosetta not responding to screensaver, requesting exit 19-3-2008 0:19:44\|ralph@home\|Task score13_hb_envtest62_A_1scjB_3394_2757_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 19-3-2008 0:19:44\|ralph@home\|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 19-3-2008 0:19:44\|ralph@home\|Restarting task score13_hb_envtest62_A_1scjB_3394_2757_0 using minirosetta version 109 19-3-2008 0:20:13\|ralph@home\|Computation for task score13_hb_envtest62_A_1scjB_3394_2757_0 finished 19-3-2008 0:20:13\|rosetta@home\|Starting OL31__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-OL31_-foldanddock__2988_14505_0 Yes I did use the show graphic tab, and the text going with the graphics showed: not responding. The graphics seems to freeze for a second. I closed the graphics and the next moment the 1.09 was reported finished. Good luck crunching Ralph, Path7.
54) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.95 (Message 3815) Posted 9 Mar 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello all, Not sure I need to report this: My first 5.95; cbs2__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_ONLY-cbs2_-lowres_dock_-dock_0220__3348_1_0 ended valid, however with the message: WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... WARNING! Not sure non-ideal rotamers are compatible with symmetry yet... Have a nice day, Path7.
55) Message boards : Current tests : Help us debug minirosetta. (Message 3789) Posted 23 Feb 2008 by Path7 Post: Is it just me or does the new mini-Rosetta (1.08 vs. 1.07) seem to stall at 0% for about 20-30 minutes (while using 100% CPU), and thereafter quickly progress? Hello Harrison Neal, Saw the same: mini-Rosetta 1.08 seems to stall (or initializing) at 0 % for about 12 minutes. The 1.07 did the same for about 2 or 5 minutes, on my machine. I'm running Windows XP home on a one core AMD sempron 3000+, 1.8 G Hz. Have a nice day, Path7.
56) Message boards : Number crunching : Minirosetta credits (Message 3745) Posted 16 Feb 2008 by Path7 Post: Hello all, Just a newbie at Ralph@home, I have done 8 Wu's so far. These minirosetta's ran fine, but generated relatively few credits. It's not I am concerned about my own credits that much (after all this is alpha). But people at Rosetta@home might be disappointed. Last 8 minirosetta 1.07 average: 5.37 points / hour. Last 8 Rosetta beta 5.93 average: 9.39 points / hour. (From rosetta@home) Since I saw the same lower points while crunching minirosetta at rosetta@home / longer runtime I am expecting the points are not lower due to the lower preference runtime at Ralph. I'm running Windows XP – home on a one-core AMD sempron 3000+ 1.8 G Hz, 1.4 GB RAM. Somebody else having the same credit experience? Have a nice day, Path7.

Previous 20