Posts by Mike Gelvin

41) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 906) Posted 18 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: After that could you rerun the tests again? Rom, Data with Symbols: Pass 1 for CSwitchDelta aprox 90 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x1de550 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x7b ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetLegoNotifyRoutine+0x83a rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x32f6b6 for CSwitchDelta 31 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49fcf Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x183 win32k.sys+0x19c2 win32k.sys+0xb72 win32k.sys!EngGetCurrentCodePage+0x3654 ntoskrnl.exe!KiReleaseSpinLock+0xae4 !local_unwind2+0x5fe830bb ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetLegoNotifyRoutine+0x83a USER32.DLL!DispatchMessageW+0x40 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x47b2fb rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x26c504 KERNEL32.dll!ProcessIdToSessionId+0x17d for CSwitchDelta 1 StartAddress WINMM.dlltimeSetEvent+0x2b0 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x183 ntoskrnl.exe!ObSetSecurityDescriptorInfo+0x62c ntoskrnl.exe!KiReleaseSpinLock+0xae4 ntdll.dll!ZwWaitForMultipleObjects+0xb Pass 2 for CSwitchDelta aprox 90 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x1de550 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x7b !local_unwind2+0x5fe830bb ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetLegoNotifyRoutine+0x83a rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49aeda rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x256bb5 for CSwitchDelta 31 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49fcf Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x183 win32k.sys+0x19c2 win32k.sys+0xb72 win32k.sys!EngGetCurrentCodePage+0x3654 ntoskrnl.exe!KiReleaseSpinLock+0xae4 !local_unwind2+0x5fe830bb ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetLegoNotifyRoutine+0x83a USER32.DLL!DispatchMessageW+0x40 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x47b2fb rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x26c504 KERNEL32.dll!ProcessIdToSessionId+0x17d for CSwitchDelta 1 StartAddress WINMM.dlltimeSetEvent+0x2b0 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x183 ntoskrnl.exe!ZwYieldExecution+0x35f ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x1ba ntdll.dll!ZwWaitForMultipleObjects+0xb Pass 3 for CSwitchDelta aprox 90 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x1de550 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiDispatchInterrupt+0x7b !local_unwind2+0x5fe830bb ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetLegoNotifyRoutine+0x83a rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x256b92 for CSwitchDelta 31 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49fcf Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x183 win32k.sys+0x19c2 win32k.sys+0xb72 win32k.sys!EngGetCurrentCodePage+0x3654 ntoskrnl.exe!KiReleaseSpinLock+0xae4 !local_unwind2+0x5fe830bb ntoskrnl.exe!PsSetLegoNotifyRoutine+0x83a USER32.DLL!DispatchMessageW+0x40 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x47b2fb rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x26c504 KERNEL32.dll!ProcessIdToSessionId+0x17d for CSwitchDelta 1 StartAddress WINMM.dlltimeSetEvent+0x2b0 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x183 ntoskrnl.exe!ZwYieldExecution+0x35f ntoskrnl.exe!KiUnexpectedInterrupt+0x1ba ntdll.dll!ZwWaitForMultipleObjects+0xb Good luck with this! Mike
42) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 904) Posted 18 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: Do that a few times and post the results here. Rom, There are 3 threads: Pass 1 for CSwitchDelta aprox 90 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x1de550 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68efb ntoskrnl.exe+0xe3ad2 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x32f6c8 for CSwitchDelta 31 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49fcf Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68e35 win32k.sys+0x19c2 win32k.sys+0xb72 win32k.sys+0x75693 ntoskrnl.exe+0x65014 ntoskrnl.exe+0xe3ad2 USER32.DLL+0x31eb3 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x47b2fb rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x26c504 KERNEL32.dll+0x28989 for CSwitchDelta 1 StartAddress WINMM.dll+0x927f Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68e35 ntoskrnl.exe+0x4fc50 ntoskrnl.exe+0x65014 ntdll.dll+0x8f03 Pass 2 for CSwitchDelta aprox 90 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x1de550 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68efb ntoskrnl.exe+0xe3ad2 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x32f656 for CSwitchDelta 31 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49fcf Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68e35 win32k.sys+0x19c2 win32k.sys+0xb72 win32k.sys+0x75693 ntoskrnl.exe+0x65014 ntoskrnl.exe+0xe3ad2 USER32.DLL+0x31eb3 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x47b2fb rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x26c504 KERNEL32.dll+0x28989 for CSwitchDelta 1 StartAddress WINMM.dll+0x927f Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68e35 ntoskrnl.exe+0x4fc50 ntoskrnl.exe+0x65014 ntdll.dll+0x8f03 Pass 3 for CSwitchDelta aprox 90 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x1de550 Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68efb ntoskrnl.exe+0xe3ad2 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x32f6b6 for CSwitchDelta 31 StartAddress rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x49fcf Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68e35 win32k.sys+0x19c2 win32k.sys+0xb72 win32k.sys+0x75693 ntoskrnl.exe+0x65014 ntoskrnl.exe+0xe3ad2 USER32.DLL+0x31eb3 rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x47b2fb rosetta_beta_4.93_windows_intelx86.exe+0x26c504 KERNEL32.dll+0x28989 for CSwitchDelta 1 StartAddress WINMM.dll+0x927f Stack: ntoskrnl.exe+0x68e35 ntoskrnl.exe+0x4fc50 ntoskrnl.exe+0x65014 ntdll.dll+0x8f03 By suspending a much higher priority project I can get this work unit to run at will... for right now its in suspended animation and left in virtual memory. It currently has 17hrs 53min 7sec of CPU time on it and is still at 1.00%. Let me know if there is any thing else I can do. I suspect you can get my email address if you need more detailed conversations. I would also be willing to call you. Additional info. BOINC is running as a service. Mike
43) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"stuck at 1%\" bugs here (Message 894) Posted 17 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: rosetta_beta 4.93 Core Client is 5.2.15 I have a "Stuck at 1%" in progress right now. I have the app set to leave workunits in memory. Its on a Win2000 SP4 machine. Heres the Result ID: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=17137 Workunit ID: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=11522 Its been running for 16 hours of CPU time. Is there any info I can gather to help with this one while its in progress? I noticed you include the .pdb file. I can do remote debugging of VS2005 apps on this machine, I just need some clues as to what to look for.
44) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors (Message 877) Posted 15 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: Mike, Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought I saw a post from you before indicating that you were running a BOINC version later than 5.2.13. If so you are correct that the error makes no sense. If you are running 5.2.13, then the Work Unit was removed from memory when the benchmark ran and that is why it errored out. I am running 5.2.15
45) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors (Message 852) Posted 11 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: Rosetta Beta 4.92 under Win 2000 SP 4 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=15965 Unexplained error. I have system to leave app in memory so I don't think it's that. Text from File: 3/11/2006 12:04:54 PM\|ralph@home\|Pausing result 7449_fullatom_relax_evdec00_2_0001.pdb_246_1_0 (left in memory) 3/11/2006 12:04:57 PM\|\|Running CPU benchmarks 3/11/2006 12:05:55 PM\|\|Benchmark results: 3/11/2006 12:05:55 PM\|\| Number of CPUs: 1 3/11/2006 12:05:55 PM\|\| 1166 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3/11/2006 12:05:55 PM\|\| 2274 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 3/11/2006 12:05:55 PM\|\|Finished CPU benchmarks 3/11/2006 12:05:56 PM\|\|Resuming computation and network activity 3/11/2006 12:05:56 PM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities 3/11/2006 12:05:56 PM\|ralph@home\|Resuming result 7449_fullatom_relax_evdec00_2_0001.pdb_246_1_0 using rosetta_beta version 492 3/11/2006 12:20:37 PM\|ralph@home\|Sending scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi 3/11/2006 12:20:37 PM\|ralph@home\|Reason: To fetch work 3/11/2006 12:20:37 PM\|ralph@home\|Requesting 96635 seconds of new work 3/11/2006 12:20:41 PM\|ralph@home\|Scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi succeeded 3/11/2006 12:20:41 PM\|ralph@home\|No work from project 3/11/2006 12:53:07 PM\|ralph@home\|Unrecoverable error for result 7449_fullatom_relax_evdec00_2_0001.pdb_246_1_0 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)) 3/11/2006 12:53:07 PM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 3/11/2006 12:53:07 PM\|ralph@home\|Computation for result 7449_fullatom_relax_evdec00_2_0001.pdb_246_1_0 finished 3/11/2006 12:53:07 PM\|SETI@home\|Starting result 11ap03ab.5070.14416.928404.1.62_0 using setiathome version 418
46) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"failure when switching projects without keeping applications in memory\" bugs here (Message 823) Posted 6 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: I only had one more work unit when I switched over to leave app in memory. It completed successfully. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13901
47) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"failure when switching projects without keeping applications in memory\" bugs here (Message 814) Posted 5 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: It is safe to say this problem was not fixed with 4.91. I ran 3 units with remove from memory, all failed: 3/4/2006 1:08:11 AM\|ralph@home\|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1opd__236_10_0 (removed from memory) 3/4/2006 1:08:11 AM\|SETI@home\|Starting result 04ap01ab.1337.20720.97162.1.69_2 using setiathome version 418 3/4/2006 1:08:13 AM\|ralph@home\|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1opd__236_10_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 3/4/2006 1:08:13 AM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 3/4/2006 1:08:13 AM\|ralph@home\|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1opd__236_10_0 finished http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13917 3/4/2006 2:59:48 AM\|ralph@home\|Scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi succeeded 3/4/2006 4:22:24 AM\|ralph@home\|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1fna__236_10_0 (removed from memory) 3/4/2006 4:22:24 AM\|SETI@home\|Starting result 21mr01aa.28899.15153.17324.1.120_0 using setiathome version 418 3/4/2006 4:22:26 AM\|ralph@home\|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1fna__236_10_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 3/4/2006 4:22:26 AM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 3/4/2006 4:22:26 AM\|ralph@home\|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1fna__236_10_0 finished http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13918 3/4/2006 12:45:18 PM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 3/4/2006 12:45:18 PM\|ralph@home\|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1bm8__236_10_0 (removed from memory) 3/4/2006 12:45:18 PM\|SETI@home\|Starting result 15fe03aa.3675.3361.892344.1.108_1 using setiathome version 418 3/4/2006 12:45:20 PM\|SETI@home\|Finished download of 07au01ab.18308.26112.359658.1.146 3/4/2006 12:45:20 PM\|SETI@home\|Throughput 93799 bytes/sec 3/4/2006 12:45:20 PM\|SETI@home\|Finished download of 07au01ab.18308.26112.359658.1.141 3/4/2006 12:45:20 PM\|SETI@home\|Throughput 201484 bytes/sec 3/4/2006 12:45:20 PM\|SETI@home\|Started download of 07au01ab.18308.26112.359658.1.142 3/4/2006 12:45:21 PM\|ralph@home\|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1bm8__236_10_0 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) 3/4/2006 12:45:21 PM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 3/4/2006 12:45:21 PM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 3/4/2006 12:45:21 PM\|\|request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded 3/4/2006 12:45:21 PM\|ralph@home\|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1bm8__236_10_0 finished http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13919 I will now change over to leave in memory and report back.
48) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"failure when switching projects without keeping applications in memory\" bugs here (Message 776) Posted 1 Mar 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: 4 successful runs and one client error (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) since reseting to leave app in memory. XP Pro. Not sure when the switch to 4.90 happened during this run.
49) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Maximum disk usage exceeded (Message 700) Posted 27 Feb 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: Several errors on this computer due to this error. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/show_host_detail.php?hostid=611 Ralph would have to exeed either 1 gig HD, or 600 Meg of virtual storage to get this error.
50) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report \"failure when switching projects without keeping applications in memory\" bugs here (Message 699) Posted 27 Feb 2006 by Mike Gelvin Post: Many Client errors on this computer due to swap outs. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/show_host_detail.php?hostid=611

Previous 20