Posts by Yeti

1) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom 0.03 (nvidia_alpha) (Message 7776) Posted 23 days ago by Yeti Post: They lowered the memory demands but they did not fix the CPU work request problems. 03/07/2024 16:48:32 \| ralph@home \| Requesting new tasks for CPU 03/07/2024 16:48:33 \| ralph@home \| Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 03/07/2024 16:48:33 \| ralph@home \| A minimum of 5120 MB (preferably 5120 MB) of video RAM is needed to process tasks using your computer's NVIDIA GPU 03/07/2024 16:48:33 \| ralph@home \| No tasks sent 03/07/2024 16:48:33 \| ralph@home \| Tasks for NVIDIA GPU are available, but your preferences are set to not accept them If you would correct your Project-Settings your client wouldn't ask for CPU-Work, look here: ------------------------------------------------------------------ 34094 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 update requested by user 34095 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 34096 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Reporting 4 completed tasks 34097 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA GPU 34098 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks 34099 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Project requested delay of 31 seconds 34100 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Started download of venv_k_pred_alpha_48.zip 34101 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Started download of venv_k_pred_alpha_79.zip 34102 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Started download of venv_k_pred_alpha_47.zip 34103 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Started download of venv_k_pred_alpha_113.zip 34104 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Finished download of venv_k_pred_alpha_48.zip (1924822 bytes) 34105 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Finished download of venv_k_pred_alpha_79.zip (1921317 bytes) 34106 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Finished download of venv_k_pred_alpha_47.zip (1920944 bytes) 34107 ralph@home 03-07-2024 19:55 Finished download of venv_k_pred_alpha_113.zip (1924219 bytes) ------------------------------------------------------------------ For me, all works as it should do and is fully comparable with other BOINC-Projects that run GPU-WUs
2) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : RoseTTAFold All-Atom (Message 7506) Posted 23 May 2024 by Yeti Post: Could you please enable the settings for NVidia-GraKas in Project-Preferences ?
3) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.16 (Message 1635) Posted 15 May 2006 by Yeti Post: Carlos, my machine don't swap, I'm running a cache of 0 days ... Greetings
4) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.16 (Message 1631) Posted 15 May 2006 by Yeti Post: Hi, I had big problems with the last rosetta-versions, so I had to stop crunching for RALPH. Now I tested 5.16 on that machine, where I got the problems; the WU took 3 1/2 hours, the problem didn't appear until now. But, memory-usage has grown up; the actual WU was at 318 MB Main-memory, 339 MB virtuel-memory :-( BOINC is running as a service, so no rosetta-screensaver ... The only thing could be, the box uses a normal windows-screensaver: WindowsServer2003 (That is the name of the screensaver !)
5) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.11 and 5.12 (Message 1556) Posted 9 May 2006 by Yeti Post: Hm, the performance-problem related to screensaver or not: I'm running BOINC as a service, with a specialized user-account; so no screensaver is available on my system, that had problems.
6) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.11 and 5.12 (Message 1547) Posted 9 May 2006 by Yeti Post: Neal and Yeti, we haven't changed anything in 5.10 that should eat up more memory, and certainly nothing should affect your internet access! If it is a memory issue, help is on the way -- our group has been making a concerted effort to trim the fat off rosetta, so that the memory footprint of many jobs will be reduced significantly, in some cases by a half! If you happen to get more information on how ralph or BOINC in general might be messing up your machines, please post. I just gave 5.12 a try, not good: My mails have been delayed for exact the time, Rosetta was running. I let it run for 45 minutes, and my mails of these last 45 minutes didn't come through :-( I suspended only the task of rosetta, so that BOINC kept running BBC and XtremLab and downloaded a WU from another project, SIMAP this time. It took less than 1 minute and all my outstanding mails came through. As most of my boxes are live-machines, I have to stop crunching RALPH, until this get's worked out. Hopefully, you will post a big message, when the version, you proposed, comes out; I will give it a try then. Or, you send a mail to my registered mail-adress, when it is time.
7) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.11 and 5.12 (Message 1537) Posted 8 May 2006 by Yeti Post: I have a bigger problem; at the moment it looks like RALPH-Wus are causing the problem. One of my maschines is a Win2K3-Server, running Exchange, Fax-Server, Virtual-Server and several more things. This box war crunching BOINC since nearly one year and I never had problems. The box has 2x XENON-CPU (HT), 3 GHz and 4 GHz of memory. The box was allowed to run BOINC-Tasks on 3 of the 4 virtuel CPUs. Yesterday I could see, that a lot of mails where not in my personal mailbox, but I could see them arriving on the server. When I suspended BOINC, all outstanding mails arrived in less than 1 minute in my personal mailbox. Well, first I thought, QMC was the problem, because in the past, sometimes QMC didn't like to give crunching power back to other tasks. Meanwhile I had only RALPH-5.11-er-Units on the server, one was taking a big amount of memory. The same behaviour as yesterday happened, Mails didn't arrive in my personal mailbox, that should have been there. When I suspended BOINC, nothing changed, but as I stopped the service, all mails came again in 1 minute into my personal mailbox. So, it can be the core client or RALPH that is causing the problem. I will let this box crunch other projects and see, if the problem comes back or not. Would be interesting, if someone else is watching some problems, maybe a possible memory leak in RALPH ? I canceled following WUs now: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=107134 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=107115 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=107025
8) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.11 and 5.12 (Message 1536) Posted 8 May 2006 by Yeti Post: HM, could it be, that there is now no text to see ? Take a look: http://yeti.kor.b-s-m.de/rosetta_5_11.gif
9) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.09 and 5.10 (Message 1513) Posted 6 May 2006 by Yeti Post: This WU (5.10) crashed on my laptop, while I had the graphics activ to display. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=104651 Unusual is, that a windows-crash is reported, windows asked me, if I want to report it to micorsoft
10) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.05 and higher (Message 1420) Posted 28 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: Back to possible bugs: Rosetta 5.06 using 161 MB of memory, 542 MB of virtuel memory The box is a very old one, the WU has run 11 hours now, sitting with 1,04 % I guess, it will never finish :-( Oh, my setting for RALPH Target CPU time is 4 hours ... This is the box: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1911 This is the result: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=98748 Abort or stay a little bit longer ? This t216 protein is really big. It used up to 250 MB on my box and needed over an hour for the first model to finish (on AMD 64 @ 2400 MHz). So I suggest not to abort but to see whether it will finish on your old machine. okay, it seems, as if it finished without error :-)
11) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.05 and higher (Message 1414) Posted 28 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: Back to possible bugs: Rosetta 5.06 using 161 MB of memory, 542 MB of virtuel memory The box is a very old one, the WU has run 11 hours now, sitting with 1,04 % I guess, it will never finish :-( Oh, my setting for RALPH Target CPU time is 4 hours ... This is the box: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1911 This is the result: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=98748 Abort or stay a little bit longer ?
12) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.03 (Message 1336) Posted 24 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: HM, if you are looking for results, that have been "killed" by the watchdog and did not get credits, look at: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/results.php?userid=581 There you can see several results, that have not been credited.
13) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.02 (Message 1295) Posted 22 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: Here is one with a large crash-dump: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=92882
14) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.02 (Message 1294) Posted 22 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: So far, all 5.02-WUs have crashed: http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=91805 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=91808 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=91965 Sevral more in progress, let's see, what's going on
15) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Debugger Stuff (Message 1287) Posted 21 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: Carlos, I'm working with RW on the theme of "Chrashes while up-/downloading". I'm shure, you have seen my messages in BOINC_ALPHA_mailing_list. There, I only use my real-name, no nick ;-) Shure there are more pdb_files, for BOINC_MGR, BOINC_EXE and so on. I have to search for the link in the deepness of my mail-programm. But this is not a theme for debugging rosetta ... Greetings and thanks for your help
16) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Debugger Stuff (Message 1285) Posted 21 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: ... after installation, copy from installation Folder all dll and all yes to u boinc folder copy .dll x:boinc_folder copy .yes x:boinc_folder u are done HM, thats really all ? I just installed the debugger on my first machine, and now, I see a lot of sub-directories. So, first question: Copy only files from "installation folder" or also from sub-folder, e.g. winxp ? Second question: If I want to bring it up on next machine, could it be copied from the first or should it be installed first and then copied ? Third question: Will it be okay for use on WIN2K-Server, WIN XP and WIN2K3-Server ? fourth question: Should I download additional pdb-files from BOINC additional ? A lot of questions :-)
17) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Network error (Message 1277) Posted 20 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: Carlos, it is not necassary a problem on your side; I have seen similar messages on several projects; normally it works out itself within hours. Must be a problem on server-side ... By the way: My configuration is similar to yours, my clients go out to the Internet with NAT, I never took a look at the mtu or ttl. And it works fine most of the time. Or, we both are using the same firewall and this firewall has a problem ...
18) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.01 (and higher) (Message 1272) Posted 20 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: HM, meanwhile my boxes have already crunched 8 WUs of real 5.01, all looks fine at the moment.
19) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Umm, 5.0 or 5.01? (Message 1271) Posted 20 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: Carlos, thnak you for your invitation and for trying this in German :-) Sorry, I am a member of a big german team called Nordlichter. Or take a look here. We didn't create this team at RALPH until now
20) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Umm, 5.0 or 5.01? (Message 1258) Posted 19 Apr 2006 by Yeti Post: @Carlos meanwhile they have stopped sending out WUs ... I used the time to update most clients to 5.4.4 ... @Moderator9 there have to happen really crazy things before I would reset a project ... Let's see, what the next turnaround will bring for surprizes ;-)

Next 20