I just successfully completed one WU.

Opened the graphics window and played around rotating the protein.

Using BOINC 5.8.6a. P4 2.8, 512 of RAM, XP Pro.

Great, I think I know what the problem is, and I'm sending them back out with the potential fix.

I had a few of these also, they occured over night. They seem to have ran a normal length of time before the error occured.

</stderr_txt>
<message>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>H1H7_1lis_PAIRWISE_DOCK_MCM_1619_1_0_0</file_name>
<error_code>-161</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>

Different issue on same subject: I now get this trying to get to ralph's home page:
can't read ../cache/65/index.php; lastmod 1149661629


(p.s. yes this also shows up as "in 5 minutes" as I edit it)

[edit - Jun 07 07:30:26 UTC homepage loads again]

Just got one of these WUs

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=15707

<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
ERROR:: Unable to obtain sequence information.
fasta file must be provided.

Further looking at the WU shows the only other person who has tried to return anything on this WU, has also gotten a client error.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=12658

15655 1679 11 Mar 2006 0:30:05 UTC 11 Mar 2006 1:36:46 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
15707 1024 11 Mar 2006 1:37:15 UTC 11 Mar 2006 9:45:04 UTC Over Client error Computing 0.00 0.00 ---
16012 1454 11 Mar 2006 9:45:11 UTC 25 Mar 2006 9:45:11 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---

I've noticed new versions of the Ralph application being released rapidly in the last week. This has been to the extent that on several days I've looked at the work tab to see I've got a WU for the new verion pending while I have the previous verion running a WU.

In this situation should I kill the WU for the older version of the app or are the developers still going to get something usefull from it? If it is going to help I don't have a problem with letting it play out (as I have been doing), however if it's nothing but waste then I'd rather kill it and devote the cycles to something that will make use of them.

Some want red, some want black, some want bold, so maybe everyone will be equally dissatisfied with red-black-bold. :)

(Or maybe you could threaten to use cyan. :p )

It think you are on to something. I will try this for a while and see how it goes. Thanks for the suggestion.

Personally I like indigo

Why other computers has daily quota of 5/day and mine has only 2/day? How is this quota determined?

testing testing one two three

Hi all!

Just signed up. Cool. Happy to help.

And I get to be the first to post on the Cafe board.

Happy crunching.

GO TFFE!

Kathryn

I signed up too, and cretead the team FaDBeens
However appears that all tests was already done by someone else.
Date Host Project ID Message
2/16/2006 7:56:43 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 131 Sending scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi
2/16/2006 7:56:43 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 132 Reason: To fetch work
2/16/2006 7:56:43 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 133 Requesting 43200 seconds of new work
2/16/2006 7:56:48 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 134 Scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi succeeded
2/16/2006 7:56:48 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 135 No work from project
2/16/2006 8:00:53 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 136 Sending scheduler request to http://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi
2/16/2006 8:00:53 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 137 Reason: To fetch work
2/16/2006 8:00:53 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 138 Requesting 43200 seconds of new work
Date Host Project ID Message
2/16/2006 8:00:58 PM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 140 No work from project

Also when you post a message it doesn't show the true time of how long ago a message is posted, I just posted one and when I went back to the main forum it said a post had been made 4 mins ago, well its was only like 10 seconds

Edit also done it on this post it reports I posted 4 mins ago