Posts by anders n

21) Message boards : Number crunching : Credits (Message 3256) Posted 30 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Is there a site where you can se which Boinc clients we are using here on Ralph and Rosetta?
22) Message boards : Number crunching : Credits (Message 3255) Posted 30 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: It may have something to do with the test work units. I did ask once if these Ralph work units are actual work units or not but don't recall getting an answer. So their actual value and therefore comparison to Rosetta may not have a lot to do with each other. If I understand what we are doing here right we are cruching the same type of work units here as will come on Rosetta later but not all of them passes the test here. What I donÂ´t know is if they use the Wu-s as science basis or if the results "just" is test runs for correct settings on Rosetta. @Feet1st I suspected that it could be the differnet computer mix that made the differance. Anders n
23) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.69-5.70 (Message 3243) Posted 28 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Not a bug but some of the lates Wu-s are huge and take up to 600 in VM. Anders n
24) Message boards : Number crunching : Credits (Message 3242) Posted 28 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Yes I know that there are projects that give more credit/H(I even run some of them). But this is Rosetta / Ralph and credit should be about the same or?? Anders n
25) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.69-5.70 (Message 3239) Posted 27 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: 1 more 2007-06-27 11:35:41\|ralph@home\|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result SSH1_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_2150_47_1 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>SSH1_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_2150_47_1_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code></file_xfer_error>) http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=499792 It seem the <error_code>-161</error_code> from 5.68 is still here. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=499558 Anders n
26) Message boards : Number crunching : Credits (Message 3238) Posted 27 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: I wonder what makes the credit difference on this host here and on Rosetta. Rosetta Ralph Anders n
27) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.69-5.70 (Message 3237) Posted 27 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: It seem the <error_code>-161</error_code> from 5.68 is still here. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=499558 Anders n
28) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.69-5.70 (Message 3236) Posted 26 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Just for Info this Wu was restarted at the same time and continued as usual. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=569051 Great, that's what I was hoping for actually. We're testing a mode of ralph in which we can run an old app version and a new app version at the same time. This is to allow some of our workunits to continue with a stable version to enable consistent results for publication, while other workunits can take advantage of later bug fixes and features. That workunit has a checkpointing issue with 5.68, but works well with 5.69 (now 5.70); I wanted to make sure I could send out one batch of jobs for the old app and one for the newer app! This Wu failed after trying to restart from last checkpoint. (I update BOINC so it was taken out of memory) http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=569191 Anders n
29) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.69-5.70 (Message 3234) Posted 26 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: This Wu failed after trying to restart from last checkpoint. (I update BOINC so it was taken out of memory) http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=569191 Anders n
30) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3206) Posted 23 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: This one failed after restarting computer. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=562489 Anders n
31) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3204) Posted 18 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Any ideas how come these 2 Wu-s was ok on my computers and not the others? http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=484660 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=488628 Anders n
32) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3191) Posted 4 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Same problem as mentioned above. Permanently 10 mins (exactly) to run. currently 92% complete, Progress still incrementing but 'to complete' static at 10 minutes. -- Rod Ellery When a WU takes longer than your run pref. time it looks like what you describe. As long as the % complete increase things should be ok :) Anders n ps Some of the WU-s take up to 4 H to make 1 model on my computers.
33) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3189) Posted 4 Jun 2007 by anders n Post: Have got a WU running at present 1acf__TREEJUMP_ABRELAX_TJTOP3_SAVE_ALL_OUT_BARCODE__2095_19_0 rosetta_beta version 568 Windows XP, Processor: AuthenticAMD Unknown CPU Type [x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 1] [fpu tsc sse 3dnow mmx] Memory: 751.49 MB physical, 3.43 GB virtual Same problem as mentioned above. Permanently 10 mins (exactly) to run. currently 92% complete, Progress still incrementing but 'to complete' static at 10 minutes. BOINC running as a service so no graphics, but Windows had blanked screen as screensaver kicked in overnight. Should I abort? -- Rod Ellery How long has it been running and what are your pref. run time?
34) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3183) Posted 29 May 2007 by anders n Post: This WU did a crash and burn when the computer ran out of VM. Anders n
35) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : not sure if this is a bug (Message 3176) Posted 27 May 2007 by anders n Post: Where does it say there are WU-s to download? Can you please copy and show me? Anders n
36) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3170) Posted 26 May 2007 by anders n Post: This WU uses A LOT of memory. My laptop has only got 512 mb ram, so the wu uses above 95% of the pagefile (1,5 to 1,6 Gb). Now after running for 3hours 27 minutes, the wu pauses and the status-field in BOINC shows the message "Waiting for memory". BOINC then just switched to another wu. What should I do? Hi Bjarke I'm not on the team "just" a tester like you :) Is there a chance for you to increase the VM? Maybe it would get the WU kicking again. Anders n
37) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.66-5.68 (Message 3168) Posted 26 May 2007 by anders n Post: This is on an Intel Mac (Macbook Pro). 5.68 seems to use far more memory than earlier versions. The VM size is 1.6GB, and the working set is over 600MB. This is causing a big impact on the machine. I have this running on a XP and it take atleast 1,2 GB of VM. Anders n EDIT It took 5H 20 min to do 1 model on a P4 2,8
38) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.65 (Message 3156) Posted 25 May 2007 by anders n Post: Please add [â€¦] to the list of aborted workunits running over 10 hours or more Are we supposed to abort tasks that run for more than ten hours? I couldnâ€™t find any announcement to that effect. No we are not supposed to abort any tasks! Unless there are a direct instruction to do so from the team. Anders n
39) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Project down? (Message 3148) Posted 24 May 2007 by anders n Post: I get 2007-05-24 07:03:03\|ralph@home\|Scheduler RPC succeeded 2007-05-24 07:03:03\|ralph@home\|Message from server: Project encountered internal error: shared memory 2007-05-24 07:03:03\|ralph@home\|Deferring communication for 1 hr 0 min 0 sec 2007-05-24 07:03:03\|ralph@home\|Reason: project is down Anders n
40) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.65 (Message 3140) Posted 23 May 2007 by anders n Post: Intell MAC Validate error Silent_out::setup: silent output with symmetry info not compatible with non-ideal bonds yet. http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=523041 http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=523042 Anders n EDIT And http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=523042

Previous 20 · Next 20