Posts by anders n

61) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2910)
Posted 25 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
A MAC issue.
Ralph showed as running but nothing was happening.
No countup on the time and when watching grafics all was frosen.
It was after ~11000 steps in a model of this Wu http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=470124
After restarting Boinc everything went back to normal.

Anders n
62) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2909)
Posted 24 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
I may be on to what is happening with my MAC.
A Ralph task was preemted and Rosetta continued and all worked as usual.
The Rosetta task finished and Ralph was to continue.
For several seconds the Ralph task showed as running but no ticking on the
CPU time then the time started to go up But I could not watch Grafics on
that task again.
I restarted Boinc and everything was back to normal.

Anders n


Same thing happend again this time it was a swich between Einstein
and Ralph.

Anders n
63) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2908)
Posted 24 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
I may be on to what is happening with my MAC.
A Ralph task was preemted and Rosetta continued and all worked as usual.
The Rosetta task finished and Ralph was to continue.
For several seconds the Ralph task showed as running but no ticking on the
CPU time then the time started to go up But I could not watch Grafics on
that task again.
I restarted Boinc and everything was back to normal.

Anders n
64) Message boards : Number crunching : Old Wu-s (Message 2907)
Posted 24 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Would someone please remove this result that has been in my results stack since March 21 -06

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/results.php?hostid=2035

Thanks

Anders n
65) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2905)
Posted 22 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Oops, yep, you must be keeping the application in memory (a good thing). I wasn't thinking. Yes, ending BOINC and restarting... basically we're forcing the WU to pick up from the last checkpoint.

Curious, what % done did it say upon restart?


69,7% It started decoy 10.

Anders n
66) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2903)
Posted 22 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
I'd suggest you suspend it, then resume it again and there are a few possible outcomes. Knowing the outcome may be of use to the Project Team.

1) it may end with errors.

2) it may restart the same model and end up in the same state of not being able to complete the model. (I'd only let it run 4hrs this time, I've not seen any tasks that should take that long to complete a model on a 2ghz CPU, which you would see by the % completed changing).

3) it may then complete the model normally in <2hrs.


Test 1Suspend and resume

- the task continues where it was.

Test 2 Restarting Boinc

- It resumes at 2H 47min and I can now view grafics.

Anders n
67) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2901)
Posted 22 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Anders n, what is your runtime preference? The watchdog should step in within about 15min of crossing 4x the preferred runtime.

Has it made no progress on model numbers in that time?


It is now at 40H 50 min.

Still at 69,7%.

My pref. runtime is 4H.

I can not open grafics on this WU.

Anders n
68) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2899)
Posted 22 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:

A new Wu "stuck" http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=467564

Now at 16H 33 min at 69,7%.
I have stopped other projects so it will not be preemted this time.
Lets hope for the best.

Anders n


It is now at 30H 19 min.
The watchdog should have done it's work by now.
What do you want me to do?

Anders n
69) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2898)
Posted 21 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Bug ?

I have one WU http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=463216
that now is at 7H 15min on a pref. of 4 H.
It is at 76.9% and has been on that for the last 2H at least.
I can't get it to show grafics.
I have 2 cores on that MAC and on the other core there is a Rosetta running
where I can se grafics ok.

I'll let it run and se how it turns out.

Anders n

[edit] 8H 15 min same 76.9% [/edit]


After 16H 28min it was swiched for Rosetta. It was finished when I woke up
this morning and reported 3H and 5 min.

Anders n

A new Wu "stuck" http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=467564

Now at 16H 33 min at 69,7%.
I have stopped other projects so it will not be preemted this time.
Lets hope for the best.

Anders n


70) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2889)
Posted 19 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
anders n, do the messages indicate that the task was preempted and restarted at all during the night? Almost sounds like it was removed from memory and reverted back to a prior checkpoint.


It was preempted but not removed from memory.

Anders n
71) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2887)
Posted 19 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Bug ?

I have one WU http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=463216
that now is at 7H 15min on a pref. of 4 H.
It is at 76.9% and has been on that for the last 2H at least.
I can't get it to show grafics.
I have 2 cores on that MAC and on the other core there is a Rosetta running
where I can se grafics ok.

I'll let it run and se how it turns out.

Anders n

[edit] 8H 15 min same 76.9% [/edit]


After 16H 28min it was swiched for Rosetta. It was finished when I woke up
this morning and reported 3H and 5 min.

Anders n
72) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.52-5.54 (Message 2884)
Posted 18 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Bug ?

I have one WU http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=463216
that now is at 7H 15min on a pref. of 4 H.
It is at 76.9% and has been on that for the last 2H at least.
I can't get it to show grafics.
I have 2 cores on that MAC and on the other core there is a Rosetta running
where I can se grafics ok.

I'll let it run and se how it turns out.

Anders n

[edit] 8H 15 min same 76.9% [/edit]
73) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.49-5.51 (Message 2839)
Posted 7 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x008F2D4C read attempt to address 0x00000E51

On a number fo Wu-s

Like this one.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=450894

Anders n
74) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.49-5.51 (Message 2837)
Posted 6 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Yea, that's a big one -- I better not send it out again!


No problem with me to send it again. :)

If possibel the big ones should be sent to the "faster" computers.

Anders n
75) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.49-5.51 (Message 2833)
Posted 5 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
process exited with code 1 (0x1)


On all my new Wu-s like this one.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=446166

Anders n
76) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.49-5.51 (Message 2831)
Posted 5 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
This Wu was atleast at step 1.000.000 when it timed out!

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=444991

Anders n
77) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.49-5.51 (Message 2828)
Posted 5 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Something is strange with these Wu-s.

Look at this text from the result page.

-2931.657911
-stderr out <core_client_version>5.8.15</core_client_version>
-<![CDATA[
-<stderr_txt>
-# random seed: 2725014
-# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
-======================================================
-DONE :: 1 starting structures built 30 (nstruct) times
-This process generated 0 decoys from 0 attempts


Run time 2931 - pref. time 14400

0 decoys from 0 attempts


http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=445590
Anders n
78) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for 5.49-5.51 (Message 2818)
Posted 4 Mar 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Whith 5.50 I get SIGBUS: bus error like this one.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=444448

Anders n
79) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Report for 5.46 (Message 2803)
Posted 17 Feb 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
I have a strange bahaving unit:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=434107

It got stuck at 46% and the status is "waiting for memory". I restarted computer but it didn't help.

I'll try changing preferences regarding memory and enlarge swap file.


It is a big type of Wu-s. It took 4,5 H to do 1 decoy on my P4 2,8.

And used 150-200 in memory.

Anders n
80) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Report for 5.46 (Message 2801)
Posted 15 Feb 2007 by Profile anders n
Post:
Watch dog "kills"

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=431076

and

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=431783

Don't know the rate of this happening but 2 on my computers

the same night made me report.

Anders n




Previous 20 · Next 20



©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org