Posts by suguruhirahara

21) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.25 (Message 1889)
Posted 12 Jul 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=216027
WARNING! attempt to gzip file .xxt319.out failed: file does not exist.
22) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.24 (Message 1851)
Posted 20 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=187639
<stderr_txt>
ERROR:: Unable to obtain sequence information.
fasta file must be provided.
ERROR:: Exit at: .initialize.cc line:236

</stderr_txt>
23) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.23 (Message 1841)
Posted 18 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
another one:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=182583
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 2996939
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
ERROR:: Exit at: .dock_structure.cc line:401

</stderr_txt>
24) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.23 (Message 1839)
Posted 18 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
An error happened in this result.
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=182521

...
<message>
- exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
</message>
...


I fear this happened after pc was back from suspend mode. but i'm not very sure.

{edit}
Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0061E868 read attempt to address 0xF8F3E75E

25) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.21 (Message 1793)
Posted 7 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
So we're trying a new strategy for our workunit queue -- from now on, there will always be work in the queue to help us debug continuously! ... Does that sound OK to everyone?
it sounds okay.

I got an error with this result.
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=152634

Outcome Client error
Client state Computing
Exit status 3 (0x3)
26) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.20 (Message 1753)
Posted 3 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
This version has some boinc-related fixes in the watchdog and graphics.
I confirmed graphics has been fixed. It works more smoothly than before.
27) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19 (Message 1734)
Posted 1 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
Instant failure, no graphics displayed but two preempted WU from Rosetta in mem:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145667

Have two more of those WU, will watch them closely.

How can I turn debug-information on?


The next two WUs failed as well with the same error code after the same time (6sec):

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145641
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145639
I got the same kind of error over whole fetched workunits such as,
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145741
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=145770
28) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19 (Message 1729)
Posted 1 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
While a progress of an unit reached 100% on my BOINC client, strangely it continues to work, and % of completed on the graphic keeps less than 100%, approximately 57%.
(here you can see a screen shot of it.) And I continue to work on the unit several minutes, but it remains at the same percentage.
This problem are solved. sorry for embarassment.
29) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19 (Message 1728)
Posted 1 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
While a progress of an unit reached 100% on my BOINC client, strangely it continues to work, and % of completed on the graphic keeps less than 100%, approximately 57%.
(here you can see a screen shot of it.) And I continue to work on the unit several minutes, but it remains at the same percentage.

Is this bug or not? thanks,

30) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19 (Message 1727)
Posted 1 Jun 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
I must be missing something. Others are processing work and finding bugs. All I have seen for a few days is "No work from project"

You request workunits untimely. Because this alpha project sends workunits out in the limited number to check them for bugs, if developers don't want to send units out, it means that they're satisfied with them and there's no need to send and check anymore. So you can't get works.

Those who are processing works now are who have requested and fetched works already.
31) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.17-5.19 (Message 1723)
Posted 31 May 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
This version works without problems on x64.

Work tasks : OK
Graphics : OK
This time I had a work unit that ran for 59 min 35 seconds... then went dormant for 60 min 25 seconds. Total was 2 hrs instead of 1.

Are your workunits CASP7? If so, it's natural to delay to finish.
Moderator9 has mentioned in the post, http://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=209#1654
d287__CASP7_ABRELAX_521_7

has been running for 6 hours and shows only 1.044% progress. This is running on a Mac.


Let it run. It is a test Work Unit for CASP7. It is probably just a large Work Unit. Do not be surprised if it suddenly jumps to 100% at the end of the first model. Do not stop Boinc Or Rosetta or it will start over at 0%.

If it gets to the place where is has run longer that about 5 times the setting for "Time" in your preferences, it will either be stopped by the "Watchdog" or you might want to consider aborting it manually at that time.

Keep us posted.


If your units aren't CASP7 ones, it might be an error, I think.
32) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.16 (Message 1682)
Posted 21 May 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
...
Anyway, has a cause of errors been identified already?

In part yes, and with the help of the people running RALPH they will eliminate it.


I see. Please keep working to eliminate errors and add new functions.
33) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.16 (Message 1680)
Posted 20 May 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
This version doesn't cause an error on my computer.

Graphic : OK
Work Tasks : OK

Here are two of completed tasks on my computer.
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=117061
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=115799

I appreciate developers for great work. :)
Anyway, has a cause of errors been identified already?
34) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.15 (Message 1618)
Posted 14 May 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
My computer hasn't faced an error so far. Graphics and work tasks both work well.
35) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.14 (Message 1614)
Posted 13 May 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
...They worked fine without error at first. However, once BOINC client has been closed and restarted, the taskes which were being done more than half started from the beginning. Is it an error, or due to my preference of RALPH?

If the work units start, and then you stop BOINC before about 25-40 min of processing, or in any case before the percent complete is more than 1.4%, when you restart BOINC they will start from zero.


Is it an unavoidable thing or an error with just this version?
36) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.14 (Message 1609)
Posted 13 May 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
OS : WindowsXP Professional x64 Edition
CPU : Intel PentiumD 920 (2.80GHz)
Used RAM : approx. 115MB x2 at max. / 1GB
Graphic card: nVidia GeForce6600GT 128MB
BOINC version : the newest, 5.4.9

Work tasks - OK before closed
Graphic - OK

They worked fine without error at first. However, once BOINC client has been closed and restarted, the taskes which were being done more than half started from the beginning. Is it an error, or due to my preference of RALPH?
37) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.05 and higher (Message 1421)
Posted 28 Apr 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
Workunits are done well also on WindowsXP x64 Edition, Pentium D 2.8Ghz and 1GB RAM, using 129MB and 75MB of it.

At this version, my computer doesn't experience the error, crashing workunits when graphics are shown on screen. very great.

But completion time is not expected well. For example, before a workunit start, to completion was "01:51:20". But it is "01:57:00" even 35% of the work was already done. I've not noticed such a great difference at former version.
38) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.02 (Message 1304)
Posted 22 Apr 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
on winxp 64bit

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=91614

<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 3886628
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
**********************************************************************
Rosetta score stayed the same too long. Watchdog is killing the run!
**********************************************************************

</stderr_txt>
<message><file_xfer_error>
<file_name>FACONTACTS_RECENTER_NOFILTERS_1pgx__399_1_0_0</file_name>
<error_code>-161</error_code>
<error_message></error_message>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>

Anyway, what is the watchdog?
39) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.01 (and higher) (Message 1274)
Posted 20 Apr 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90578

<core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version>
<message> - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 3887591
# random seed: 3887591
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600

</stderr_txt>

this error appeared when the graphic is shown on screen.
I 've faced another error like this before this beta version. sorry but i can't remember the version. Both were being run on windows xp 64bit.
40) Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : OLD- Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher) (Message 1086)
Posted 12 Apr 2006 by suguruhirahara
Post:
i got an error in 4.99 on winxp x64. it's also access violation.

Unrecoverable error for result HBLR_1.0_1n0u_377_7_1 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005))


Previous 20



©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org