RALPH@home

Bug reports for Ralph 5.04

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.04

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Feb 14 06
Posts: 161
ID: 4
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 1338 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 1:48:41 UTC

    Thanks for continuing posts of ralph errors.
    This will probably be our last development release
    on ralph before putting the app on Rosetta@home. We really need to know if anything is fundamentally wrong with this one!
    ____________

    tralala

    Joined: Apr 12 06
    Posts: 52
    ID: 1266
    Credit: 15,257
    RAC: 0
    Message 1344 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 11:06:21 UTC - in response to Message 1338.

      Thanks for continuing posts of ralph errors.
      This will probably be our last development release
      on ralph before putting the app on Rosetta@home. We really need to know if anything is fundamentally wrong with this one!


      Then put up a few more WUs! Why so few testing?
      ____________

      Profile TritoneResolver
      Avatar

      Joined: Feb 16 06
      Posts: 2
      ID: 71
      Credit: 4,397
      RAC: 0
      Message 1345 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 12:14:34 UTC

        Haven\'t seen this error before, but here it is: WU 84203

        <core_client_version>5.3.6</core_client_version>
        <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
        </message>
        <stderr_txt>
        # random seed: 3884798
        # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800
        # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800
        ERROR:: Exit at: .\\dock_structure.cc line:401

        ____________

        [B^S] sTrey
        Avatar

        Joined: Feb 15 06
        Posts: 58
        ID: 36
        Credit: 15,430
        RAC: 0
        Message 1347 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 15:58:14 UTC

          Last modified: 25 Apr 2006 15:59:26 UTC

          My one 5.04 wu, and one 5.03 wu for that matter, both finished successfully. However I\'m wondering why they both finished in under 2 hours when my preference is set to 16 hours and earlier wu\'s did run for that time.

          wu 95168, 5.04
          wu 94408, 5.03

          rbpeake

          Joined: Feb 16 06
          Posts: 19
          ID: 218
          Credit: 3,370
          RAC: 0
          Message 1348 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 16:13:20 UTC - in response to Message 1347.

            My one 5.04 wu, and one 5.03 wu for that matter, both finished successfully. However I\'m wondering why they both finished in under 2 hours when my preference is set to 16 hours and earlier wu\'s did run for that time.

            wu 95168, 5.04
            wu 94408, 5.03

            Did you \"Update\" with BOINC Manager after changing your preferences on the web site? If not, the preferences will not be changed until the client contacts the server. Pardon me if this response is too obvious, but you never know.... :)
            ____________

            [B^S] sTrey
            Avatar

            Joined: Feb 15 06
            Posts: 58
            ID: 36
            Credit: 15,430
            RAC: 0
            Message 1349 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 16:23:02 UTC - in response to Message 1348.

              Last modified: 25 Apr 2006 16:25:00 UTC

              My one 5.04 wu, and one 5.03 wu for that matter, both finished successfully. However I\'m wondering why they both finished in under 2 hours when my preference is set to 16 hours and earlier wu\'s did run for that time.

              wu 95168, 5.04
              wu 94408, 5.03

              Did you \"Update\" with BOINC Manager after changing your preferences on the web site? If not, the preferences will not be changed until the client contacts the server. Pardon me if this response is too obvious, but you never know.... :)


              No problem, appreciate the thought (however I did update). I should have said in my original post that the result files show the preference set to 16 hours.

              simpe73

              Joined: Feb 20 06
              Posts: 2
              ID: 619
              Credit: 36,752
              RAC: 0
              Message 1350 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 16:44:55 UTC - in response to Message 1338.

                Thanks for continuing posts of ralph errors.
                This will probably be our last development release
                on ralph before putting the app on Rosetta@home. We really need to know if anything is fundamentally wrong with this one!


                Some work for testing, please! I\'ve only got about 2 WU\'s per host. One WU (resultid=95455) has crached...

                ____________

                Profile feet1st

                Joined: Mar 7 06
                Posts: 312
                ID: 1028
                Credit: 110,522
                RAC: 1
                Message 1352 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 17:26:38 UTC

                  I have same, first 2 WUs completed in 1hr 10min. But my updated preference to Ralph indicates I\'d prefer 16hrs as well.
                  ____________

                  Rhiju
                  Forum moderator
                  Project developer
                  Project scientist

                  Joined: Feb 14 06
                  Posts: 161
                  ID: 4
                  Credit: 3,725
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 1354 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 18:32:26 UTC - in response to Message 1352.

                    For those jobs, we had it set to make a maximum of 10 predictions -- \"hit it and quit it\". That was mainly so that we\'d have some results back quickly. Thanks for asking for more work! I\'m sending out more jobs now, asking for 50 predictions.

                    Things looks OK for ralph 5.04 so far. We\'re still getting the occasional file transfer error when the watchdog aborts, but that\'s not the end of the world. Looking into it.

                    I have same, first 2 WUs completed in 1hr 10min. But my updated preference to Ralph indicates I\'d prefer 16hrs as well.


                    ____________

                    Profile feet1st

                    Joined: Mar 7 06
                    Posts: 312
                    ID: 1028
                    Credit: 110,522
                    RAC: 1
                    Message 1355 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 18:36:40 UTC

                      Last modified: 25 Apr 2006 18:36:58 UTC

                      Quess I should have put this here:

                      I\'ve not had hung WUs before, but watchdog stepped in and killed one after about 1hr 10min runtime, with a 16hr preference. My other WU (same PC) seemed to end normally, but again, after about 1hr 10min rather than the 16hr preference. 2 more crunching now, during the day, so I can watch them run.


                      Does the watchdog just compare two points in time? Is it possible the score was jumping all around for an hour, and just happened to be exactly the same at that instant in time an hour later? Or is it looking at the step I\'m on too?

                      ____________

                      rbpeake

                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                      Posts: 19
                      ID: 218
                      Credit: 3,370
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 1356 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 18:42:18 UTC - in response to Message 1354.

                        For those jobs, we had it set to make a maximum of 10 predictions -- \"hit it and quit it\". That was mainly so that we\'d have some results back quickly. I\'m sending out more jobs now, asking for 50 predictions.

                        I have my Preferences set to 8 hours, which I guess is OK if the workunit is set to report at a set time anyway. Or maybe you mean you have overwritten the time preferences, and if it takes longer than 8 hours to get 50 predictions, then that is what it will take? Might be prudent to make this clarification, so people don\'t get too stressed if their time preferences are ignored for now. :)

                        Thanks!
                        ____________

                        KB7RZF

                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                        Posts: 7
                        ID: 49
                        Credit: 1,426
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 1357 - Posted 25 Apr 2006 20:54:56 UTC

                          Last modified: 25 Apr 2006 20:57:07 UTC

                          Got this error on This WU running the BOINC CC 5.4.2. The \"Target CPU Run Time\" was set on 2 hours. Changed it to 4 hours, will see how the next WU goes when I get it.

                          Result ID 95456
                          Name CHECK_600_DOG_7486h002_dec08_1.pdb_410_2_1
                          Workunit 83413
                          Created 25 Apr 2006 14:06:59 UTC
                          Sent 25 Apr 2006 14:07:19 UTC
                          Received 25 Apr 2006 21:07:58 UTC
                          Server state Over
                          Outcome Client error
                          Client state Computing
                          Exit status 0 (0x0)
                          Computer ID 65
                          Report deadline 9 May 2006 14:07:19 UTC
                          CPU time 4949.296875
                          stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.2</core_client_version>
                          <stderr_txt>
                          # random seed: 3885562
                          # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
                          **********************************************************************
                          Rosetta score is stuck or going too long. Watchdog is killing the run!
                          Stuck at score -128.786 for 600 seconds
                          **********************************************************************

                          </stderr_txt>
                          <message><file_xfer_error>
                          <file_name>CHECK_600_DOG_7486h002_dec08_1.pdb_410_2_1_0</file_name>
                          <error_code>-161</error_code>
                          </file_xfer_error>

                          </message>


                          Validate state Invalid
                          Claimed credit 11.0121627676007
                          Granted credit 0
                          application version 5.04

                          ____________

                          Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                          Avatar

                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                          Posts: 182
                          ID: 296
                          Credit: 22,792
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 1359 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 0:51:01 UTC

                            For 1 days, this result is 100% done, but does not upload at all

                            I run several projects on ths pc, and keep work in ram.

                            When boinc switches for ralph@home ... boincview shows cpu eficciency 0.0000

                            After about an hour, boinc switches for next project ...
                            then cpu efficiency is restored to 0.9809

                            And this cycle, is repeating for 1 days .. (I believe for ever, if I do nothing)
                            http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=94996

                            I am aborting this result now, manually
                            ____________
                            Click signature for global team stats

                            Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                            Avatar

                            Joined: Feb 16 06
                            Posts: 182
                            ID: 296
                            Credit: 22,792
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 1361 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 1:05:57 UTC

                              Last modified: 26 Apr 2006 1:17:50 UTC

                              Exit status 0 (0x0) - Watchdog is killing the run!, no credits granted
                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=95121
                              ps: I have the debugger installed on this pc

                              ____________
                              Click signature for global team stats

                              Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                              Avatar

                              Joined: Feb 16 06
                              Posts: 182
                              ID: 296
                              Credit: 22,792
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 1362 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 4:55:57 UTC

                                I believe that the credits should be granted in this case !
                                *No error in my part.

                                Snake Doctor

                                Joined: Feb 16 06
                                Posts: 37
                                ID: 44
                                Credit: 996,938
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 1363 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 5:03:45 UTC - in response to Message 1362.

                                  Last modified: 26 Apr 2006 5:04:16 UTC

                                  I believe that the credits should be granted in this case !
                                  *No error in my part.

                                  From a link off the RALPH Home page -

                                  RALPH@home is the official alpha test project for Rosetta@home. New application versions, work units, and updates in general will be tested here before being used for production. The goal for RALPH@home is to improve Rosetta@home.

                                  Please consider the following before deciding to join:

                                  Since this project is a testing environment, applications and work units may be unstable at times.
                                  Credits and other competitive statistics do not mean anything in this test project. Credits may be lost due to instabilities and may be reset at any time for testing.
                                  There will not be a continual flow of work units. Work units will be issued only when necessary for testing.
                                  We urge participants to not abort work units to help with testing.
                                  Please set the resource share low for this project compared to other production projects in your RALPH@home preferences.


                                  Emphisis added for clarity

                                  Regards
                                  Phil

                                  Profile anders n

                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                  Posts: 166
                                  ID: 91
                                  Credit: 131,419
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 1364 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 5:11:38 UTC - in response to Message 1362.

                                    I believe that the credits should be granted in this case !
                                    *No error in my part.



                                    You are right Carlos.

                                    You should have gotten credit for the WU.

                                    Somthing for the developers to look at before it reaches Rosetta.

                                    Anders n
                                    ____________

                                    [B^S] sTrey
                                    Avatar

                                    Joined: Feb 15 06
                                    Posts: 58
                                    ID: 36
                                    Credit: 15,430
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 1365 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 5:47:26 UTC

                                      Last modified: 26 Apr 2006 5:48:32 UTC

                                      wu 85055 was killed by the watchdog; credits were granted.

                                      cpu_run_time_pref: 57600
                                      Watchdog is killing the run! Stuck at score 2.48287 for 3600 seconds

                                      Profile leylinewalker

                                      Joined: Apr 19 06
                                      Posts: 2
                                      ID: 1296
                                      Credit: 1,284
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 1366 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 5:55:54 UTC

                                        Not sure if this is the right place to report this, but I am seeing errors on the graphics. Strands are broken - I see as many as six ends. Graphic is moving partially outside the box on the search and accepted graphics. No problems yet running the code, though.
                                        ____________

                                        Profile anders n

                                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                                        Posts: 166
                                        ID: 91
                                        Credit: 131,419
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 1380 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 14:12:08 UTC

                                          A new watchdog kill.

                                          http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=95535

                                          switching tasks involved?

                                          Anders n
                                          ____________

                                          Profile anders n

                                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                                          Posts: 166
                                          ID: 91
                                          Credit: 131,419
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 1381 - Posted 26 Apr 2006 15:08:25 UTC

                                            On my other computer the watchdog kills them all.

                                            Like this one

                                            http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=95606

                                            My swiching time is now 2 H.

                                            Will set it to 30 min to se if it changes the results.

                                            Anders n
                                            ____________

                                            Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.04


                                            Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                            Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                            Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                            Back to top ^