RALPH@home

Bug reports for Ralph 5.09 and 5.10

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.09 and 5.10

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Feb 14 06
Posts: 161
ID: 4
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 1481 - Posted 5 May 2006 2:36:29 UTC

    Last modified: 6 May 2006 6:51:06 UTC

    See news page for a description of improvements in 5.09.

    Also, by the way, if you\'re seeing problems with workunits of the following type, please abort them: HOMO_XXXX... They have a known problem. We\'re glad we tried these on ralph before on rosetta@home!
    ____________

    FluffyChicken

    Joined: Feb 17 06
    Posts: 54
    ID: 414
    Credit: 710
    RAC: 0
    Message 1486 - Posted 5 May 2006 12:30:50 UTC - in response to Message 1481.

      See news page for a description of improvements in 5.09.

      Also, by the way, if you\'re seeing problems with workunits of the following type, please abort them: HOMO_XXXX... They have a known problem. We\'re glad we tried these on ralph before on rosetta@home!



      Hi, although I\'m unable to do actual application test on Ralph :-( do the the file size nature ....

      May an idea for future version of Ralph tests (after the many others ;-) would be to try a terminate commend to remove these \'bad\' units. I would assume a way similar to how ClimatePrediction terminates it\'s task over there.

      I something like this.
      - Select tasks that need terminating (server end)
      - When client connects to server, instruct it to stop the task.
      - Send a little message along with it (I think others have managed to do this) to say sorry... etc..

      Mainly useful for members that use larger caches, so you can pull them out and they don\'t waste time (at the best) or have big problems (at the worst). since the clients will contact to send a result back, update or just becuase it scheduled to.

      I know CPDN.net do that because there it wastes lots of time if a model isn\'t working.

      Though I\'m tempted to see the new screensaver changes...

      Right, of out to a cafe with a good Wi-fi connection with my laptop to have some fun :-)




      ____________

      FluffyChicken

      Joined: Feb 17 06
      Posts: 54
      ID: 414
      Credit: 710
      RAC: 0
      Message 1488 - Posted 5 May 2006 15:19:17 UTC

        Though having some work to test would help ;-)

        Unless of course you have all you need sent out.
        ____________

        Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
        Avatar

        Joined: Feb 16 06
        Posts: 182
        ID: 296
        Credit: 22,792
        RAC: 0
        Message 1493 - Posted 5 May 2006 21:08:14 UTC

          Last modified: 5 May 2006 21:22:26 UTC

          Exit status 1 (0x1)
          http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=102884

          May 4, 2006
          Update to ralph 5.09. Now allows us to post descriptions of workunit on your screensaver (so you know what\'s going on!), graphics is rescaled for large proteins, and some fixes for the jumping mode. Please post bugs in this thread.


          I dont use screesaver, but occasinally I click \"show graphics\"

          I would like to see how the new graphics looks like ,,, but no WUs to test ?
          ____________
          Click signature for global team stats

          Neal

          Joined: Mar 6 06
          Posts: 4
          ID: 997
          Credit: 32,213
          RAC: 0
          Message 1496 - Posted 5 May 2006 22:34:27 UTC

            Anyone else having trouble with the system locking while running tha Ralph 5.09 beta version? My preferences specify to suspend on activity, but system stays locked. Anything I should try??

            Neal. (No fancy images)

            Profile Astro

            Joined: Feb 16 06
            Posts: 141
            ID: 48
            Credit: 32,977
            RAC: 0
            Message 1499 - Posted 5 May 2006 23:38:28 UTC - in response to Message 1496.

              Last modified: 5 May 2006 23:40:52 UTC

              Anyone else having trouble with the system locking while running tha Ralph 5.09 beta version? My preferences specify to suspend on activity, but system stays locked. Anything I should try??

              Neal. (No fancy images)

              I\'ve been wondering too, if the ralph app is fully releasing (i.e closing down) immediately or if it takes some time to get to a point where it can checkpoint, before releasing. Sorry, I have no further info on this.

              P.S if you click \"reply to this post\" you can just copy and paste the bbcode into your \"forum preferences\", so you CAN have a \"fancy image\". Unless you meant the avatar on the left



              tony

              Dimitris Hatzopoulos

              Joined: Feb 16 06
              Posts: 31
              ID: 303
              Credit: 2,308
              RAC: 0
              Message 1500 - Posted 5 May 2006 23:41:30 UTC

                One bug I see with 5.09 is that the \"text description area\" contains multiple occurances of the same text info, so e.g. right now running in front of me I see the same text repeated FOUR (4) times:

                \"Testing jumping/strand break protocol on BOINC with 1tul_ and 7 jumps
                Sampling a comprehensive list of about 200,000 topologies and strand pairings\"

                Perhaps it\'s an oversight where it outputs the text once for every model (now processing model 4)?
                ____________

                doc :)

                Joined: Feb 16 06
                Posts: 46
                ID: 60
                Credit: 4,437
                RAC: 0
                Message 1503 - Posted 6 May 2006 0:35:19 UTC

                  Last modified: 6 May 2006 1:00:16 UTC

                  not sure if this is a bug, more a cosmetic thing probably.
                  got a 5.09 running here right now, opened the graphics (not using the BOINC screensaver), maximized the window and i got a area on the right side, wider than the rmsd area, thats completely black without anything in it. (my screen resolution is 1024*768)
                  the description of what its doing right now looks like a nice new feature, it just looks a little dark on my sreen if you ask me. i can not verify what dimitris is seeing though, i only got the description once, and i am in model 3 right now.
                  edit: now at model 4 i got the description twice.
                  pic:

                  doc :)

                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                  Posts: 46
                  ID: 60
                  Credit: 4,437
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 1504 - Posted 6 May 2006 1:43:30 UTC

                    Last modified: 6 May 2006 1:44:50 UTC

                    too late to edit :)
                    model 8, description there 3 times now.
                    edit: still model 8, description appeared a 4th time while i was typing this.

                    wizzszz

                    Joined: Apr 28 06
                    Posts: 17
                    ID: 1333
                    Credit: 1,128
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 1505 - Posted 6 May 2006 1:47:46 UTC

                      Every time the Graphical User Interface is restarted, the text area contains one more copy of the description! The graphics area shrinks accordingly!
                      ____________

                      Moderator9
                      Forum moderator

                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                      Posts: 251
                      ID: 210
                      Credit: 0
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 1506 - Posted 6 May 2006 1:48:39 UTC - in response to Message 1503.

                        Last modified: 6 May 2006 1:51:25 UTC

                        not sure if this is a bug, more a cosmetic thing probably.
                        got a 5.09 running here right now, opened the graphics (not using the BOINC screensaver), maximized the window and i got a area on the right side, wider than the rmsd area, thats completely black without anything in it. (my screen resolution is 1024*768)
                        the description of what its doing right now looks like a nice new feature, it just looks a little dark on my sreen if you ask me. i can not verify what dimitris is seeing though, i only got the description once, and i am in model 3 right now.
                        edit: now at model 4 i got the description twice.
                        pic:


                        The large blank area is the result of the resizing to fit the proteins inside the right box. That blank area looks bigger on 16:9 aspect ratio than it does on normal monitors.
                        ____________
                        Moderator9
                        RALPH@home FAQs
                        RALPH@home Guidelines
                        Moderator Contact

                        Profile Astro

                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                        Posts: 141
                        ID: 48
                        Credit: 32,977
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 1508 - Posted 6 May 2006 2:54:19 UTC

                          Here\'s my first 5.09 failure. I don\'t know if it was running at the time, but I did a restart, then went to watch TV while it booted. When I returned, I saw the screensaver with a \"fatal error\" box. It\'s wu 90424.

                          Result ID 103370
                          Name JUMP_ALLBARCODES_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_478_262_0
                          Workunit 90424
                          Created 5 May 2006 22:18:37 UTC
                          Sent 5 May 2006 22:26:28 UTC
                          Received 6 May 2006 3:08:30 UTC
                          Server state Over
                          Outcome Client error
                          Client state Computing
                          Exit status -1073741811 (0xffffffffc000000d)
                          Computer ID 2172
                          Report deadline 9 May 2006 22:26:28 UTC
                          CPU time 14071.640625
                          stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                          <message>
                          - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
                          </message>
                          <stderr_txt>
                          # random seed: 3078577
                          # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
                          # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
                          # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
                          # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
                          WARNING! error deleting file .\\xx1tul.out
                          # DONE :: 1 starting structures built 36 (nstruct) times
                          # This process generated 36 decoys from 36 attempts

                          </stderr_txt>


                          Profile anders n

                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                          Posts: 166
                          ID: 91
                          Credit: 131,419
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 1509 - Posted 6 May 2006 4:04:08 UTC

                            Last modified: 6 May 2006 4:04:49 UTC

                            A wu that faild.

                            http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=103714

                            Anders n
                            ____________

                            Moderator9
                            Forum moderator

                            Joined: Feb 16 06
                            Posts: 251
                            ID: 210
                            Credit: 0
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 1510 - Posted 6 May 2006 4:51:34 UTC

                              Last modified: 6 May 2006 4:54:25 UTC

                              Rhiju,

                              There is no doubt about it. The Display of the \"JUMPING/STRAND Break Protocol\" is a real cat pleaser. The thing looks like a well baited fish hook. But there does seem to be a problem with the new text display repeating for at least the first three models. With each repeat the overall graphic seems to stretch vertically distorting the display slightly each time the lines are repeated. It is as if a file or variable that should be overwritten is not being cleared correctly. But you have solved the problem of the graphics not fitting in the boxes. That part looks real good. One thing you might consider for the graphic is to keep the count of steps for the first model and display that as the project step count for subsequent models. Also if the RMSD and ENERGY of the target is known, that would be good to include so people can see if they are getting close as the models are running. Obviously this would only for known structures.

                              So far the only errors I have seen for Mac or Windows on any of these machines has been on the HOMO Work Units, which seem to just be recycles from other systems.

                              ____________
                              Moderator9
                              RALPH@home FAQs
                              RALPH@home Guidelines
                              Moderator Contact

                              Rhiju
                              Forum moderator
                              Project developer
                              Project scientist

                              Joined: Feb 14 06
                              Posts: 161
                              ID: 4
                              Credit: 3,725
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 1511 - Posted 6 May 2006 6:54:09 UTC - in response to Message 1510.

                                Cool! I saw the same problem with the workunit description, and its pretty annoying. I think I put in the fix in 5.10; let\'s see.

                                Its great to see that fatal errors are being reported below! I hope Rom is able to use this feedback to pinpoint where in the code things are going wrong...

                                Rhiju,

                                There is no doubt about it. The Display of the \"JUMPING/STRAND Break Protocol\" is a real cat pleaser. The thing looks like a well baited fish hook. But there does seem to be a problem with the new text display repeating for at least the first three models. With each repeat the overall graphic seems to stretch vertically distorting the display slightly each time the lines are repeated. It is as if a file or variable that should be overwritten is not being cleared correctly. But you have solved the problem of the graphics not fitting in the boxes. That part looks real good. One thing you might consider for the graphic is to keep the count of steps for the first model and display that as the project step count for subsequent models. Also if the RMSD and ENERGY of the target is known, that would be good to include so people can see if they are getting close as the models are running. Obviously this would only for known structures.

                                So far the only errors I have seen for Mac or Windows on any of these machines has been on the HOMO Work Units, which seem to just be recycles from other systems.


                                ____________

                                Profile Astro

                                Joined: Feb 16 06
                                Posts: 141
                                ID: 48
                                Credit: 32,977
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 1512 - Posted 6 May 2006 9:58:18 UTC

                                  Last modified: 6 May 2006 9:59:25 UTC

                                  And another 5.09 fatal error on the same puter. This time I woke to the screen saver with the fatal error box in the middle of the screen. WU 90425

                                  Result ID 103371
                                  Name JUMP_ALLBARCODES_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_478_263_0
                                  Workunit 90425
                                  Created 5 May 2006 22:18:37 UTC
                                  Sent 5 May 2006 22:26:28 UTC
                                  Received 6 May 2006 10:10:56 UTC
                                  Server state Over
                                  Outcome Client error
                                  Client state Computing
                                  Exit status -1073741811 (0xffffffffc000000d)
                                  Computer ID 2172
                                  Report deadline 9 May 2006 22:26:28 UTC
                                  CPU time 14116.328125
                                  stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                  <message>
                                  - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
                                  </message>
                                  <stderr_txt>
                                  # random seed: 3078576
                                  # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
                                  # DONE :: 1 starting structures built 50 (nstruct) times
                                  # This process generated 50 decoys from 50 attempts

                                  </stderr_txt>


                                  Validate state Invalid
                                  Claimed credit 55.6278372895192

                                  Yeti
                                  Avatar

                                  Joined: Feb 19 06
                                  Posts: 30
                                  ID: 581
                                  Credit: 49,557
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 1513 - Posted 6 May 2006 11:47:44 UTC

                                    This WU (5.10) crashed on my laptop, while I had the graphics activ to display.

                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=104651

                                    Unusual is, that a windows-crash is reported, windows asked me, if I want to report it to micorsoft

                                    ____________


                                    Supporting BOINC, a great concept !

                                    Pieface

                                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                                    Posts: 64
                                    ID: 234
                                    Credit: 203,513
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 1514 - Posted 6 May 2006 13:13:12 UTC

                                      Odd watchdog behavior on this unit: resid 103076. So far it has run for 7:04 cpu time and still at 1.030 pct complete, but watchdog hasn\'t killed it, it just swapped it out and let another ralph 5.09 run instead?
                                      It\'s on ny laptop, hostid, not a hyperthreaded machine, running BM 5.4.7, and
                                      it doesn\'t seem to be hurting anything att, just sitting there in \'preempted\' status so I haven\'t aborted it or anything (yet).

                                      Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                      Avatar

                                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                                      Posts: 182
                                      ID: 296
                                      Credit: 22,792
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 1515 - Posted 6 May 2006 13:48:51 UTC

                                        Last modified: 6 May 2006 14:04:02 UTC

                                        This WU (5.09) Windows is being currently run
                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=104408

                                        The grapics is showing:

                                        Testing jump protocol for an alpha/beta taken from

                                        ---- a blank line ----


                                        a previus blind trial experiment (LiveBench)


                                        This is no bug, but above message would fit into *one* line into
                                        the space used by graphics (there is a fine line delimiting)

                                        And this space used by rosetta graphics I guess is about 800x600 Pixels -:(
                                        -> (wich is less than my screen) -
                                        That is 1024x768 32 bit Colour
                                        and has *all* space used by boinc \"show graphics\"

                                        but Rosetta grapics is on a square/rectangle delimited by a fine line
                                        *below off this line
                                        there are other informations
                                        34.4% complete
                                        CPU Time ....
                                        ....
                                        .... and on bottom
                                        Roseta@home v5.09 http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta .... accepted energy:-36.21......
                                        *Notice that this is the URL of rosetta *not* of ralph

                                        Wich initially confused me into believing that I was looking at another graphics
                                        * other than the one I wanted to look -:(

                                        *notice The graphics thread is running at thread priority 4
                                        while the crunching thread is running at thread priority 1
                                        and the grapics is very fast !!! and is using 20% CPU !
                                        May be the web interface can be changed to allow less than 20% CPU
                                        for graphics ... and allow slow rates than 20 frames/second too ???


                                        *Now , I will resize my screen to 480x600 Pixels 16 bit ...
                                        and then post how graphics swhon on there

                                        *Completing this post first, (may be a system crash, may occurs) I use OpenGL
                                        ____________
                                        Click signature for global team stats

                                        IceQueen41
                                        Avatar

                                        Joined: Feb 22 06
                                        Posts: 6
                                        ID: 692
                                        Credit: 9,473
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 1516 - Posted 6 May 2006 14:41:25 UTC

                                          The graphics bug hasn\'t quite been fixed yet (in 5.10). Although only one instance of the descriptive text shows up now, when opening the graphics interface a second (and third, and so on) time, there is an extra blank line between the two lines of text, pushing the rest of the WU info off the screen (model, step, time, percentage, etc), no matter how the window is resized.
                                          ____________

                                          Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                          Avatar

                                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                                          Posts: 182
                                          ID: 296
                                          Credit: 22,792
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 1517 - Posted 6 May 2006 15:09:20 UTC

                                            notice the graphics thread on rosetta production v5.07
                                            uses only 10% cpu despite on web interface is set to 20%
                                            and uses *all* available graphics space
                                            and is very fast too , cause not less than 20 frames by second are allowed

                                            *And runs at thread priority 4 too!

                                            *Not switched yet to 640x480 16 bbp -:( I am busy now. Sorry
                                            ____________
                                            Click signature for global team stats

                                            Moderator9
                                            Forum moderator

                                            Joined: Feb 16 06
                                            Posts: 251
                                            ID: 210
                                            Credit: 0
                                            RAC: 0
                                            Message 1518 - Posted 6 May 2006 15:43:05 UTC - in response to Message 1517.

                                              Last modified: 6 May 2006 15:45:24 UTC

                                              notice the graphics thread on rosetta production v5.07
                                              uses only 10% cpu despite on web interface is set to 20%
                                              and uses *all* available graphics space
                                              and is very fast too , cause not less than 20 frames by second are allowed

                                              *And runs at thread priority 4 too!

                                              *Not switched yet to 640x480 16 bbp -:( I am busy now. Sorry

                                              Those are MAXIMUM settings. If it does not need the whole amount it will not use it all.
                                              ____________
                                              Moderator9
                                              RALPH@home FAQs
                                              RALPH@home Guidelines
                                              Moderator Contact

                                              Profile Astro

                                              Joined: Feb 16 06
                                              Posts: 141
                                              ID: 48
                                              Credit: 32,977
                                              RAC: 0
                                              Message 1519 - Posted 6 May 2006 15:52:01 UTC

                                                Last modified: 6 May 2006 15:52:18 UTC

                                                It\'s a \"hat trick\" 3 of 3 of these 5.09 ended in fatal error, on this one puter. I don\'t have anymore to see if successful completion can occur without the screensaver. Each with the screensaver displayed and an error box asking if I should send the report to MS. WU 90436

                                                Result ID 103382
                                                Name JUMP_ALLBARCODES_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_478_274_0
                                                Workunit 90436
                                                Created 5 May 2006 22:18:38 UTC
                                                Sent 5 May 2006 22:26:28 UTC
                                                Received 6 May 2006 15:57:03 UTC
                                                Server state Over
                                                Outcome Client error
                                                Client state Computing
                                                Exit status -1073741811 (0xffffffffc000000d)
                                                Computer ID 2172
                                                Report deadline 9 May 2006 22:26:28 UTC
                                                CPU time 2748.828125
                                                stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                                <message>
                                                - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)
                                                </message>
                                                <stderr_txt>
                                                # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
                                                # random seed: 3078565

                                                </stderr_txt>


                                                Validate state Invalid

                                                Moderator9
                                                Forum moderator

                                                Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                Posts: 251
                                                ID: 210
                                                Credit: 0
                                                RAC: 0
                                                Message 1520 - Posted 6 May 2006 15:58:03 UTC - in response to Message 1519.

                                                  ... and an error box asking if I should send the report to MS. WU 90436
                                                  ...

                                                  \"MS\"!! Well there is your problem right there. Send it to the attention of \"Bill\". ;>)
                                                  ____________
                                                  Moderator9
                                                  RALPH@home FAQs
                                                  RALPH@home Guidelines
                                                  Moderator Contact

                                                  Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                                  Avatar

                                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                  Posts: 182
                                                  ID: 296
                                                  Credit: 22,792
                                                  RAC: 0
                                                  Message 1521 - Posted 6 May 2006 19:01:15 UTC

                                                    Last modified: 6 May 2006 19:32:06 UTC

                                                    Those are MAXIMUM settings. If it does not need the whole amount it will not use it all.


                                                    YES, I already know what u said - before u have said !

                                                    *May be I need of studying english some more. English is not my native Idiom.


                                                    What I was trying to show is that ralph graphics
                                                    are using 2 times the qty of CPU that rosetta graphics uses.


                                                    a suggestion for rosetta/ralph preferences

                                                    Use accelerated graphics: (yes/no) default no, for who does not set it.

                                                    *may be, then, the cpu usage by graphics, drops to 0.01% to who set yes,
                                                    and has adequate software/hardware installed -:)

                                                    I hope this time I am rigth understood.

                                                    Thanks
                                                    ____________
                                                    Click signature for global team stats

                                                    Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                                    Avatar

                                                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                    Posts: 182
                                                    ID: 296
                                                    Credit: 22,792
                                                    RAC: 0
                                                    Message 1522 - Posted 6 May 2006 21:01:46 UTC

                                                      I am now, crunching this WU (5.10) Windows
                                                      http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=104840

                                                      Grapics remains with the same problems as I had reported previously for 5.09

                                                      However I found time to test other screen resolutions

                                                      A) In 640x480 nothing below 1st line of descriptive text is shown

                                                      b) After restoring my screen to 1024x768
                                                      Grafics does not shown nothing below nn.nnn% Complete !
                                                      *seems that ralph graphics has a strong memory -:(

                                                      *it remembers the previous screen resolution.
                                                      So the problems of not showing the CPU time ... and all others things below -:(

                                                      ____________
                                                      Click signature for global team stats

                                                      Nuadormrac
                                                      Avatar

                                                      Joined: Feb 22 06
                                                      Posts: 68
                                                      ID: 699
                                                      Credit: 2,739
                                                      RAC: 0
                                                      Message 1523 - Posted 7 May 2006 7:20:27 UTC

                                                        My first 2 units on 5.10 crashed, though the third is crunching now... Here are the particulars

                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105784

                                                        stderr out

                                                        <core_client_version>5.4.1</core_client_version>
                                                        <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                                        </message>
                                                        <stderr_txt>
                                                        ERROR:: Exit at: .\\barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                        </stderr_txt>


                                                        Crashed at 10 seconds of crunch time. Looking further, another computer crashed with this same WU

                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=92286

                                                        The second WU, had the same exact symptoms and error message, though thus far it hasn\'t yet been assigned to a second computer:

                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105748
                                                        ____________

                                                        doc :)

                                                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                        Posts: 46
                                                        ID: 60
                                                        Credit: 4,437
                                                        RAC: 0
                                                        Message 1524 - Posted 7 May 2006 10:36:01 UTC

                                                          this one bombed out with incorrect function here too, others completed fine.

                                                          Pieface

                                                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                          Posts: 64
                                                          ID: 234
                                                          Credit: 203,513
                                                          RAC: 0
                                                          Message 1525 - Posted 7 May 2006 13:18:59 UTC

                                                            I am also having problems with these nativebarcode units on 5.10 :

                                                            wu 105372
                                                            wu 105500
                                                            wu 105506

                                                            same error as below 0x1 on barcode_classes.cc

                                                            Nuadormrac
                                                            Avatar

                                                            Joined: Feb 22 06
                                                            Posts: 68
                                                            ID: 699
                                                            Credit: 2,739
                                                            RAC: 0
                                                            Message 1526 - Posted 7 May 2006 16:40:18 UTC

                                                              Got 3 more WUs with the same exact error.

                                                              stderr out

                                                              <core_client_version>5.4.1</core_client_version>
                                                              <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
                                                              </message>
                                                              <stderr_txt>
                                                              ERROR:: Exit at: .\\barcode_classes.cc line:500

                                                              </stderr_txt>


                                                              And on these 3 computers, both computers the WUs were given to errored out...

                                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105778
                                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105764
                                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105754
                                                              ____________

                                                              Profile leylinewalker

                                                              Joined: Apr 19 06
                                                              Posts: 2
                                                              ID: 1296
                                                              Credit: 1,284
                                                              RAC: 0
                                                              Message 1528 - Posted 7 May 2006 21:36:16 UTC

                                                                Got the following on my AMD:
                                                                5/7/2006 2:52:05 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_482_64_2 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))

                                                                leylinewalker
                                                                ____________

                                                                wizzszz

                                                                Joined: Apr 28 06
                                                                Posts: 17
                                                                ID: 1333
                                                                Credit: 1,128
                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                Message 1529 - Posted 8 May 2006 1:09:44 UTC

                                                                  Same crash after few seconds, using my Intel M 1.7 Notebook
                                                                  ____________

                                                                  Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                                                  Avatar

                                                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                                  Posts: 182
                                                                  ID: 296
                                                                  Credit: 22,792
                                                                  RAC: 0
                                                                  Message 1532 - Posted 8 May 2006 6:03:32 UTC

                                                                    Exit status 1 (0x1) Raplph (5.10) Windows
                                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105454
                                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=106231
                                                                    ____________
                                                                    Click signature for global team stats

                                                                    Rhiju
                                                                    Forum moderator
                                                                    Project developer
                                                                    Project scientist

                                                                    Joined: Feb 14 06
                                                                    Posts: 161
                                                                    ID: 4
                                                                    Credit: 3,725
                                                                    RAC: 0
                                                                    Message 1533 - Posted 8 May 2006 6:28:06 UTC - in response to Message 1516.

                                                                      Last modified: 8 May 2006 6:28:33 UTC

                                                                      Quick comments:

                                                                      (1) I noticed the continuing graphics bug too... I\'ve tried to fix it for 5.11.

                                                                      (2) I figured out the problem with the NATIVEBARCODE workunits, canceled the old workunits, and sent out some fixed ones! Thanks!

                                                                      (3) The other error reports are quite useful -- combined with some more debugging code we\'ve implemented, we can hopefully get rid of some of thse problems. Maybe we can cut this error rate from 5-10% to 1-2%!


                                                                      Thanks for posting, and please post bugs for 5.11 (I just put it up) in the other thread I\'m setting up.

                                                                      The graphics bug hasn\'t quite been fixed yet (in 5.10). Although only one instance of the descriptive text shows up now, when opening the graphics interface a second (and third, and so on) time, there is an extra blank line between the two lines of text, pushing the rest of the WU info off the screen (model, step, time, percentage, etc), no matter how the window is resized.


                                                                      ____________

                                                                      casio7131

                                                                      Joined: Mar 20 06
                                                                      Posts: 15
                                                                      ID: 1151
                                                                      Credit: 12,660
                                                                      RAC: 0
                                                                      Message 1535 - Posted 8 May 2006 8:32:01 UTC

                                                                        all ralph 5.10:

                                                                        7/05/2006 4:33:55 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result HOMO_7447_h002_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST7447h002_dec00_2.pdb_474_20_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105313

                                                                        7/05/2006 5:52:11 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_481_140_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105853

                                                                        7/05/2006 5:52:13 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_481_172_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105888

                                                                        7/05/2006 5:56:32 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_481_153_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105869

                                                                        7/05/2006 5:56:32 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_481_93_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105878

                                                                        7/05/2006 6:05:10 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result NOCHECK_NO_DOG_7486h002_dec08_1.pdb_417_3_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105863

                                                                        7/05/2006 7:38:46 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result NOCHECK_NO_DOG_7486h002_dec129_1.pdb_417_3_1 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=105866

                                                                        7/05/2006 7:42:01 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_482_84_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=106120

                                                                        7/05/2006 7:42:01 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result JUMP_NATIVEBARCODE_ANTIPARALLEL_1tul__SAVE_ALL_OUT_482_41_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
                                                                        http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=106034

                                                                        Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.09 and 5.10


                                                                        Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                                                        Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                                                        Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                                                        Back to top ^