BAM or RALPH bug?

Author	Message
Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0	Message 2244 - Posted: 26 Aug 2006, 23:28:08 UTC Changing the resource share via BAM causes the default cpu target time to change to not selected. I haven't yet checked whether this is also the case with Rosetta. ID: 2244 · Reply Quote

feet1st Send message Joined: 7 Mar 06 Posts: 313 Credit: 116,623 RAC: 0	Message 2246 - Posted: 27 Aug 2006, 2:04:24 UTC Last modified: 27 Aug 2006, 1:53:07 UTC Certainly sounds like a problem. Since there's little you could do otherwise to get Ralph to change the value, and BAM is so new, sounds likely on the BAM side. On the other hand, Ralph being hit by BAM is new too, so perhaps there's something in the server code they need to modify, since the WU runtime preference is not a standard BOINC field. But I'm sure they'll want you to post what you find. ID: 2246 · Reply Quote

Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0	Message 2248 - Posted: 27 Aug 2006, 5:01:53 UTC Yep, happens with Rosetta too. ID: 2248 · Reply Quote

Astro Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 141 Credit: 32,977 RAC: 0	Message 2251 - Posted: 27 Aug 2006, 10:05:14 UTC It's probably "Boincstats-Willy" problem. It might have to do with the special fields that only rosetta has. BAM is still a work in progress. ID: 2251 · Reply Quote

Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0	Message 2252 - Posted: 27 Aug 2006, 12:51:38 UTC - in response to Message 2251. It's probably "Boincstats-Willy" problem. It might have to do with the special fields that only rosetta has. BAM is still a work in progress. Nope, just checked with Willy and he's already raised it with RALPH/Rosetta. The dev's have two choices only change the resource share when that is initiated by BAM, or open up all preferences to be changed by BAM - or something like that anyway. Whatever solution RALPH and Rosetta choose then Willy can code accordingly. ID: 2252 · Reply Quote