Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : BAM or RALPH bug?
Author | Message |
---|---|
Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0 |
Changing the resource share via BAM causes the default cpu target time to change to not selected. I haven't yet checked whether this is also the case with Rosetta. |
feet1st Send message Joined: 7 Mar 06 Posts: 313 Credit: 116,623 RAC: 0 |
Certainly sounds like a problem. Since there's little you could do otherwise to get Ralph to change the value, and BAM is so new, sounds likely on the BAM side. On the other hand, Ralph being hit by BAM is new too, so perhaps there's something in the server code they need to modify, since the WU runtime preference is not a standard BOINC field. But I'm sure they'll want you to post what you find. |
Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0 |
Yep, happens with Rosetta too. |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 141 Credit: 32,977 RAC: 0 |
It's probably "Boincstats-Willy" problem. It might have to do with the special fields that only rosetta has. BAM is still a work in progress. |
Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0 |
It's probably "Boincstats-Willy" problem. It might have to do with the special fields that only rosetta has. BAM is still a work in progress. Nope, just checked with Willy and he's already raised it with RALPH/Rosetta. The dev's have two choices only change the resource share when that is initiated by BAM, or open up all preferences to be changed by BAM - or something like that anyway. Whatever solution RALPH and Rosetta choose then Willy can code accordingly. |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
BAM or RALPH bug?
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org