RALPH@home

Bug Reports for 5.44

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for 5.44

AuthorMessage
Chu
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Sep 26 06
Posts: 61
ID: 1900
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2687 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 5:08:31 UTC

    Last modified: 21 Jan 2007 17:30:48 UTC

    This update has some new rosetta applications added in, such as a preliminary version of rosetta protein design protocol and a special rosetta docking protocol which handles symmetric oligomers. The primary developers of those protocols will post more details about their applications. Please note that we are still working on adding thread synchronization features to the rosetta graphics and we are sorry that this update DOES NOT have the graphic-related problem fixed.

    Profile Inais
    Avatar

    Joined: Jul 30 06
    Posts: 12
    ID: 1634
    Credit: 13,115
    RAC: 0
    Message 2689 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 10:17:53 UTC

      The progress sometimes socked - for example at 23.142% or on an other WU at 1,041%. But some crunched WU\'s completed correctly (hope so)
      ____________
      I wish I can fly like a bird in the sky

      genes
      Avatar

      Joined: Feb 16 06
      Posts: 45
      ID: 57
      Credit: 43,300
      RAC: 0
      Message 2690 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 12:49:20 UTC

        I saw this WU (which is a 5.44) running this morning, and thought \"Ooh, maybe they fixed the graphics\", so I clicked on \"show graphics\". Well, the graphics ran for a few seconds, then locked up. Not only that, but the whole machine locked up. After about 20 seconds or so, a feature of this new ATI driver I\'m using (7.1) kicked in: it\'s called VPU recover. The display driver basically reset itself, and everything came back. The WU in question is still running, it didn\'t error out. I guess I can safely assume, though, that the graphics bug is not fixed yet.

        ____________

        Profile slavko.sk
        Avatar

        Joined: Feb 16 06
        Posts: 4
        ID: 197
        Credit: 6,755
        RAC: 0
        Message 2691 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 12:58:41 UTC

          With last WU on Linux box I\'m getting this message right after WU starts:

          ralph@home 21.1.07 11:09:15 Task 1c9oA_BOINC_ABRELAX_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1640_3_0 exited with zero status but no \'finished\' file
          ralph@home 21.1.07 14:50:47 If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.

          Resseting project doesn\'t help.
          Any idea?
          ____________
          ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
          My Stats

          Conrad Poohs
          Avatar

          Joined: Aug 29 06
          Posts: 9
          ID: 1758
          Credit: 1,955
          RAC: 0
          Message 2692 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 15:15:20 UTC

            I hoped that the graphics were fixed in 5.44 but when I left the screensaver on and came back to it I couldnt exit screensaver mode without cancelling This WU.

            ____________

            Chu
            Forum moderator
            Project developer
            Project scientist

            Joined: Sep 26 06
            Posts: 61
            ID: 1900
            Credit: 12,545
            RAC: 0
            Message 2693 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 15:53:14 UTC - in response to Message 2691.

              Did you get errors like this for all the recent WUs so far?

              With last WU on Linux box I\'m getting this message right after WU starts:

              ralph@home 21.1.07 11:09:15 Task 1c9oA_BOINC_ABRELAX_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1640_3_0 exited with zero status but no \'finished\' file
              ralph@home 21.1.07 14:50:47 If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.

              Resseting project doesn\'t help.
              Any idea?

              Profile slavko.sk
              Avatar

              Joined: Feb 16 06
              Posts: 4
              ID: 197
              Credit: 6,755
              RAC: 0
              Message 2694 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 16:37:07 UTC - in response to Message 2693.

                Yes, for below mentioned one and also for:

                ralph@home 21.1.07 18:30:19 Task 1urnA_BOINC_POSE_ABRELAX_VARY_SC_BOND_ANGLES_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1641_3_0 exited with zero status but no \'finished\' file

                ralph@home 21.1.07 18:29:55 Task 1tif__BOINC_ABRELAX_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1640_7_0 exited with zero status but no \'finished\' file

                You may check my results:
                http://ralph.bakerlab.org/results.php?userid=197

                Did you get errors like this for all the recent WUs so far?
                With last WU on Linux box I\'m getting this message right after WU starts:

                ralph@home 21.1.07 11:09:15 Task 1c9oA_BOINC_ABRELAX_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1640_3_0 exited with zero status but no \'finished\' file
                ralph@home 21.1.07 14:50:47 If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.

                Resseting project doesn\'t help.
                Any idea?



                ____________
                ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
                My Stats

                Profile slavko.sk
                Avatar

                Joined: Feb 16 06
                Posts: 4
                ID: 197
                Credit: 6,755
                RAC: 0
                Message 2695 - Posted 21 Jan 2007 17:10:47 UTC

                  It is special Linux 2.4.27-grsec build ... maybe there is a problem. I seem the same error on ABC@home project, Malariacontrol.net doesn\'t work at all cause no graphic libraries are on the system. Rosetta so far work and RALF was working also except of the last WU\'s.

                  Hans Sveen

                  Joined: Feb 17 06
                  Posts: 8
                  ID: 390
                  Credit: 281,507
                  RAC: 63
                  Message 2696 - Posted 22 Jan 2007 8:22:42 UTC

                    Hello!
                    Work unit 351148 just ended without any problems (screensaver not running!) on my host id 474......

                    BUT....
                    The next one wuid 352037 has a coupple of issues so far; first its cpu usage was 50 % of my 3 cores currently running; still after suspending it still uses 25 %! The cpu clock still runs after I suspended it hmmmm... I am not sure what is common memory usage, but this wu uses 221968 K when not running !
                    Restarted the wu then the memory usage jumped to nearly 225 000 K then dropped to about 219 000 K , this time with \"show graphic\" running I can see it works ok. Memory usage jumps between the two before mentioned \"digits\".
                    It has currenly completed 1.5 hour of max 6 hours!

                    Hope this can be useful in the debugging!

                    With regards,


                    ____________
                    Hans Sveen
                    Oslo, Norway

                    Profile anders n

                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                    Posts: 166
                    ID: 91
                    Credit: 131,419
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 2697 - Posted 22 Jan 2007 8:39:33 UTC

                      The memory usage is alot bigger on my new tasks than before.

                      About 207000-215000kB.

                      It´s not a problem on my computers but might be for others.

                      Anders n
                      ____________

                      Hans Sveen

                      Joined: Feb 17 06
                      Posts: 8
                      ID: 390
                      Credit: 281,507
                      RAC: 63
                      Message 2698 - Posted 22 Jan 2007 8:44:27 UTC - in response to Message 2696.

                        Hello!
                        Work unit 351148 just ended without any problems (screensaver not running!) on my host id 474......

                        BUT....
                        The next one wuid 352037 has a coupple of issues so far; first its cpu usage was 50 % of my 3 cores currently running; still after suspending it still uses 25 %! The cpu clock still runs after I suspended it hmmmm... I am not sure what is common memory usage, but this wu uses 221968 K when not running !
                        Restarted the wu then the memory usage jumped to nearly 225 000 K then dropped to about 219 000 K , this time with \"show graphic\" running I can see it works ok. Memory usage jumps between the two before mentioned \"digits\".
                        It has currenly completed 1.5 hour of max 6 hours!

                        Hope this can be useful in the debugging!

                        With regards,



                        Edit:

                        A small follow up, I guess vthe cpu usage has to do with the Not fixed graphic problem; when closing down boinc and after the restart ralph went back to 25 %cpu usage, so it seems open the graphic starts as a whole new work unit!!

                        See You soon!



                        ____________
                        Hans Sveen
                        Oslo, Norway

                        Profile feet1st

                        Joined: Mar 7 06
                        Posts: 312
                        ID: 1028
                        Credit: 110,522
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 2699 - Posted 22 Jan 2007 16:00:54 UTC

                          This thread needs a sticky... and perhaps UNsticky some of the older releases.

                          Wondering if there is anything in the WU names, or elsewhere that one can use to confirm a given WU was specifically designed for the \"high memory\" systems? I mean these docking WUs seem to take 200MB rather then the 110 that has been passing for normal. As a tester, just wanting to assure these WUs were properly flagged to only go to systems with 512MB. And how does that work if the system is a hyperthreaded CPU? Would it require the machine to have 1GB? (512 per active core?)
                          ____________

                          Pieface

                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                          Posts: 64
                          ID: 234
                          Credit: 203,513
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 2700 - Posted 23 Jan 2007 18:01:00 UTC

                            I don\'t know if this is exactly a \'problem\', but i have been noticing that
                            my pentium-m Win-xp machine hostid 2606 occasionally is being granted twice what it requests credit wise, for example, running four hours it requests forty someting credits and is granted 100 or so. A couple of the wu\'s i noticed were:
                            wu 346971
                            wu 348266
                            wu 347050
                            Might cause a \'stir\' over on the production side.

                            Profile Conan
                            Avatar

                            Joined: Feb 16 06
                            Posts: 345
                            ID: 145
                            Credit: 1,333,577
                            RAC: 247
                            Message 2702 - Posted 24 Jan 2007 2:39:24 UTC - in response to Message 2700.

                              I don\'t know if this is exactly a \'problem\', but i have been noticing that
                              my pentium-m Win-xp machine hostid 2606 occasionally is being granted twice what it requests credit wise, for example, running four hours it requests forty someting credits and is granted 100 or so. A couple of the wu\'s i noticed were:
                              wu 346971
                              wu 348266
                              wu 347050
                              Might cause a \'stir\' over on the production side.


                              I think you will see that on the \'production\' side the cobblestones awarded are lower than in Ralph, a lot depends on what science has been done in the WU. From my point of view it is not a problem.
                              ____________

                              Profile Conan
                              Avatar

                              Joined: Feb 16 06
                              Posts: 345
                              ID: 145
                              Credit: 1,333,577
                              RAC: 247
                              Message 2703 - Posted 24 Jan 2007 2:44:59 UTC

                                On a different note, I had a WU that after 4 hours 27 seconds (4.00.27) according to Boinc my WU was 100% complete. Unfortunately it was still \'running\' according to Boinc with the time not progressing. It was stuck so I had to abort it. I do not run graphics on this Linux machine. My time preference is 6 hours.

                                http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=402096
                                ____________

                                Profile Silver Streak

                                Joined: Dec 11 06
                                Posts: 5
                                ID: 2357
                                Credit: 216,369
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 2707 - Posted 25 Jan 2007 15:16:35 UTC

                                  Just getting around to reporting this:

                                  Yesterday while updating some software on one of my computers, I had to restart to finish the install. Upon restart, both of the WU\'s in progress had erred out. Sorry I can\'t give more information, but I thought I should report this.
                                  ____________

                                  Profile slavko.sk
                                  Avatar

                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                  Posts: 4
                                  ID: 197
                                  Credit: 6,755
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 2711 - Posted 27 Jan 2007 9:00:18 UTC

                                    I\'m still getting these messages:

                                    2007-01-27 10:37:00 [ralph@home] Restarting task 1bgf__BOINC_ABRELAX_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1660_17_0 using rosetta_beta version 544
                                    2007-01-27 10:37:01 [ralph@home] Task 1bgf__BOINC_ABRELAX_NEWRELAXFLAGS_frags83__1660_17_0 exited with zero status but no \'finished\' file
                                    2007-01-27 10:37:01 [ralph@home] If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.

                                    Nothing in stderrdae.txt, only above messages in stdoutdae.txt.

                                    ____________
                                    ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
                                    My Stats

                                    Profile Conan
                                    Avatar

                                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                                    Posts: 345
                                    ID: 145
                                    Credit: 1,333,577
                                    RAC: 247
                                    Message 2712 - Posted 27 Jan 2007 12:02:27 UTC

                                      > Just had work unit fail

                                      http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=403445

                                      stderr out

                                      <core_client_version>5.2.14</core_client_version>
                                      <message>process exited with code 1 (0x1)
                                      </message>
                                      <stderr_txt>
                                      Graphics are disabled due to configuration...
                                      fullatom_setup.cc: CHANGING fa_max_dis to 6!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                                      ERROR:: Exit at: read_paths.cc line:346

                                      </stderr_txt>

                                      ____________

                                      Pieface

                                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                                      Posts: 64
                                      ID: 234
                                      Credit: 203,513
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 2713 - Posted 27 Jan 2007 13:51:19 UTC

                                        I\'m seeing quite a few of those failures as well, but a few - maybe 1/3 - are getting thru OK.
                                        Bad ones are:
                                        [/url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=403020] resultid 403020 [/url]
                                        [/url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=403021] resultid 403021 [/url]
                                        [/url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=403093] resultid 403093 [/url]
                                        [/url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=403094] resultid 403094 [/url]
                                        [/url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=403262] resultid 403262 [/url]
                                        [/url=http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=405824] resultid 405824 [/url]

                                        Profile Trog Dog
                                        Avatar

                                        Joined: Aug 8 06
                                        Posts: 38
                                        ID: 1670
                                        Credit: 41,996
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 2716 - Posted 27 Jan 2007 22:48:13 UTC

                                          Same with this wu.
                                          ____________

                                          Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for 5.44


                                          Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                          Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                          Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                          Back to top ^