Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Old - Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher)
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Seems that version 5.00 is OK ! I have crunched these WUs without a single error PC with 256 MB RAM p4 removing from RAM https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88451 PC with 512 MB RAM Athlon XP https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=87860 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=87861 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=87903 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=87910 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=87913 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88072 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88117 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88118 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88119 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88122 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88334 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=88335 My question is: When 5.00 windows will go to replace the buggy Rosetta 4.98 ? ps: I have not yet tested it on Linux, cause lack of enough WUs, but at least the windows 5.00 I consider GOOD ! Click signature for global team stats ![]() ![]() |
rbpeake Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 19 Credit: 3,370 RAC: 0 |
My question is: When 5.00 windows will go to replace the buggy Rosetta 4.98 ? I have the same question. My experience with 5.00 shows it to be much better than 4.98, which shows an occasional bug now and then. |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 06 Posts: 313 Credit: 116,623 RAC: 0 |
I attempted to display the graphics for a WU and it blinked the graphic window and killed it, and seems to have crashed the WU. I tried to display graphic both at 9:02 and at 10:34, I had THOUGH I was displaying the Ralph graphic in both cases. 4/18/2006 7:00:00 AM||Suspending network activity - time of day 4/18/2006 9:02:38 AM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result 7565_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7565_1_06_6.pdb_440_88_0 (There are no child processes to wait for. (0x80) - exit code 128 (0x80)) 4/18/2006 9:02:42 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 4/18/2006 9:02:42 AM|rosetta@home|Computation for result 7565_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7565_1_06_6.pdb_440_88_0 finished 4/18/2006 9:02:47 AM|rosetta@home|Starting result 7565_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7565_1_01_9.pdb_440_88_0 using rosetta version 498 4/18/2006 10:34:07 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1bm8__383_7_0 (There are no child processes to wait for. (0x80) - exit code 128 (0x80)) 4/18/2006 10:34:09 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 4/18/2006 10:34:09 AM|ralph@home|Computation for result FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1bm8__383_7_0 finished Link to the WU |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 06 Posts: 313 Credit: 116,623 RAC: 0 |
So I then enabled my network access to report the WU, and (as has often happened when I enable my network access) I get errors in all active projects: climate and in Rosetta & Ralph: 4/18/2006 10:42:47 AM||Resuming network activity 4/18/2006 10:43:37 AM|rosetta@home|Sending scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi 4/18/2006 10:43:37 AM|rosetta@home|Reason: To fetch work 4/18/2006 10:43:37 AM|rosetta@home|Requesting 132831 seconds of new work, and reporting 3 results 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM|climateprediction.net|Result sulphur_imrd_100869305_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM|climateprediction.net|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM|rosetta@home|Result 7565_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7565_1_01_9.pdb_440_88_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM|rosetta@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM|ralph@home|Result FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1bq9A_383_7_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM|ralph@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 4/18/2006 10:43:40 AM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 4/18/2006 10:43:41 AM|rosetta@home|Restarting result 7565_largescale_large_fullatom_relax_dec7565_1_01_9.pdb_440_88_0 using rosetta version 498 4/18/2006 10:43:42 AM|ralph@home|Restarting result FACONTACTS_NOFILTERS_1bq9A_383_7_0 using rosetta_beta version 500 4/18/2006 10:43:46 AM|rosetta@home|Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded While this happens BOINC seems to hang (i.e. unresponsive to user clicks). I've also seen it sometimes loop through many of these zero status but no finished file messages. Eventually a BOINC reschedule came through and seemed to halt the loop. This is WIN XP Pro, SP1 This is the box where I moved BOINC to a network drive, so perhaps the delay in accessing disk causes such problems? |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 141 Credit: 32,977 RAC: 0 |
Feet1st, The "no finished file" message means Boinc.exe (the daemon), lost contact with Boincmgr.exe (the manager). The move to a network drive may have something to do with it. I assume the manager in on a local puter and the daemon is on the network drive. tony |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Feet1st, The "no finished file" message means Boinc.exe (the daemon), lost contact with Boincmgr.exe (the manager). The move to a network drive may have something to do with it. I assume the manager in on a local puter and the daemon is on the network drive. Sure ? I see this occurs on *all* projects I crunch when my 2gbit Internet link is overloaded by excess of network traffic. However is the boinc.exe (the daemon) that lost contact with the science crunching application, cause the O/S was unable to service the loopback link. Normally IP 127.0.0.1 Boincmgr.exe is irrelevant to this occurrence. In fact I run boincview.exe instead of boincmgr.exe And If this is a bug , is a bug of boinc , not of rosetta. Also all those jobs that exited, with zero status, but no 'finished' file, later are automatically re-started by boinc. No loss ! I did STOPed crunching Rosetta 4.98 on my PC's cause that 4.98 errors ! So now, on a thread to report 5.00 bugs, 4.98 bugs are mixed. While furter delays on upgrading Rosetta are achieved, I crunch other projects, no problems. lol btw: Where is the required link for that rosetta 4.98 result that erroed ? Click signature for global team stats ![]() ![]() |
Nuadormrac![]() Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
ps: I have not yet tested it on Linux, cause lack of enough WUs, Not sure about 5.0 on Linux, but 4.98 did seem to go without incident on Linux, the problems we were seeing, being specific to the Windows app... 5.0 has been running without error for me as well... |
[B^S] sTrey![]() Send message Joined: 15 Feb 06 Posts: 58 Credit: 15,430 RAC: 0 |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
By now, I have too 2 results that erred out using 5.00 The familiar Exit status 1 (0x1) Less than 3% of error, and not stuck. Much better than 4.98 -:) https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90016 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90137 ps: The latest debugger from microsoft *is* installed on this PC Click signature for global team stats ![]() ![]() |
casio7131 Send message Joined: 20 Mar 06 Posts: 15 Credit: 12,660 RAC: 0 |
20/04/2006 4:18:44 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result LOOPFARLX_NO_FARLX_dec7553_1_00_10.pdb_394_1_1 ( - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)) https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=90355 |
rbpeake Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 19 Credit: 3,370 RAC: 0 |
|
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Old - Bug reports for Windows Ver - 5.00 (and higher)
©2025 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org