Message boards : Current tests : 10% difference good enough ?
Author | Message |
---|---|
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 17 Feb 06 Posts: 54 Credit: 710 RAC: 0 |
I recon a 10% difference is good going for any credit system My first two results for the same coputer 3,324.83 secs 7.57 credit = 439 secs for 1 credit 3,557.41 secs 9.00 credit = 395 secs for 1 credit So we have ~11% difference between these two tasks on the same computer. Really they should be the same time for 1 credit but that's never going to happen :-) Is that good enough? Not a large sample though, that could only make it worse ;-) |
Trog Dog Send message Joined: 8 Aug 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 41,996 RAC: 0 |
I recon a 10% difference is good going for any credit system Well its an improvement over the difference generated by using an optimised client :) |
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 17 Feb 06 Posts: 54 Credit: 710 RAC: 0 |
I recon a 10% difference is good going for any credit system The difference for the same computer/client is very good, say using the comparison above but looking at BOINC credit (I think this is currently using 5.5.0) But of course what you mean is between 5.5.0 and 5.4.9/11 well that would be around a 300% difference ;-) |
FluffyChicken Send message Joined: 17 Feb 06 Posts: 54 Credit: 710 RAC: 0 |
Now two computer returned results (all results are since this morning) Like I said it can only get worse. AthlonXP 2500+ stock 11 results MAX seconds/credit = 439 MIN seconds/credit = 261 difference 168% from min to max (ave = 357 seconds/credit) Pentium III-m 1GHz MAX seconds/credit = 744 MIN seconds/credit = 529 difference 141% from min to max (ave = 630 seconds/credit) Certainly needs to be improved from just my few results returned |
Message boards :
Current tests :
10% difference good enough ?
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org