Bug Report for Ralph 5.27

Author	Message
Chu Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 26 Sep 06 Posts: 61 Credit: 12,545 RAC: 0	Message 2295 - Posted: 27 Sep 2006, 21:11:45 UTC Ralph has been updated to 5.27. In this version, we fixed a problem in the 5.26 of reporting percentage of progess correctly for the docking application. Also, several new flags are added for full atom relax application. ID: 2295 · Reply Quote

computerguy09 Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 6,480 RAC: 0	Message 2296 - Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 0:29:00 UTC - in response to Message 2295. Ralph has been updated to 5.27. In this version, we fixed a problem in the 5.26 of reporting percentage of progess correctly for the docking application. Also, several new flags are added for full atom relax application. OK, isn't my client supposed to upgrade versions automagically? I didn't think much of it when the app went to 5.26, but now that we've gone to 5.27, and my Linux client hasn't auto updated. And no, I don't have any custom xml keeping it at 5.25. Suggestions?? ID: 2296 · Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0	Message 2297 - Posted: 28 Sep 2006, 1:53:55 UTC - in response to Message 2296. Hi computerguy99, that's a good question. I think your boinc manager picked up a bunch of workunits before both the updates and is still crunching through them. When your computer is ready for new work, it should get the new application along with it. If you want, you can abort your current workunits -- then you can test out some of the new kinds of modes that we're trying! Ralph has been updated to 5.27. In this version, we fixed a problem in the 5.26 of reporting percentage of progess correctly for the docking application. Also, several new flags are added for full atom relax application. OK, isn't my client supposed to upgrade versions automagically? I didn't think much of it when the app went to 5.26, but now that we've gone to 5.27, and my Linux client hasn't auto updated. And no, I don't have any custom xml keeping it at 5.25. Suggestions?? ID: 2297 · Reply Quote

Norman_RKN Send message Joined: 26 Mar 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 4,877 RAC: 0	Message 2299 - Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 7:16:15 UTC Unzulï¿½ssige Funktion. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> Couldn't find file /work/rhiju/virus/1qgtA/1QGT-chain-A-vq.pdb for reading in dummy model. ERROR:: Exit at: .dummy_model.cc line:368 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273952 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273951 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273950 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273949 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273948 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273947 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=273946 etc. etc. are the WUÂ´s damaged ? ID: 2299 · Reply Quote

Inais Send message Joined: 30 Jul 06 Posts: 12 Credit: 13,115 RAC: 0	Message 2301 - Posted: 29 Sep 2006, 17:17:59 UTC Last modified: 29 Sep 2006, 17:04:09 UTC I got a Client/Computing error on WorkUnit ID 243651, result ID 273553 from today. 1qgtA_BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_CRYOEM_hom001__1318_1 Biba - Inais. I wish I can fly like a bird in the sky ID: 2301 · Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 14 Feb 06 Posts: 161 Credit: 3,725 RAC: 0	Message 2302 - Posted: 30 Sep 2006, 0:45:37 UTC - in response to Message 2301. Last modified: 30 Sep 2006, 0:31:03 UTC Hi: there were problems with that batch of workunits. I'll fix it and send it out again! I got a Client/Computing error on WorkUnit ID 243651, result ID 273553 from today. 1qgtA_BOINC_ABINITIO_SAVE_ALL_OUT_CRYOEM_hom001__1318_1 Biba - Inais. ID: 2302 · Reply Quote

Jerry Camden Send message Joined: 4 May 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 69,952 RAC: 0	Message 2303 - Posted: 30 Sep 2006, 16:08:14 UTC Last modified: 30 Sep 2006, 16:10:52 UTC I'm not sure if this is a client or WU problem. But WUID 241813 has now been running for over 24 hours. It has shown as 100% complete for at least the last 14 hours. I'm aborting it. <Edit> I had to close Boinc to get the Ralph client to end. Boinc showed it had switched to a Seti@home task but task manager showed Ralph 5.27 was still running at 90+% cpu. When I restarted Boinc, it logged the following error... 9/30/2006 11:22:59 AM\|\|Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC 9/30/2006 11:22:59 AM\|ralph@home\|State file error: result DOCK_1EFU_unbound_perturb_benchmark_1315_10_1 is in wrong state 9/30/2006 11:22:59 AM\|\|Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+ </edit> This PC is running Boinc 5.6.4 on Win2K. ID: 2303 · Reply Quote

Chu Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 26 Sep 06 Posts: 61 Credit: 12,545 RAC: 0	Message 2304 - Posted: 3 Oct 2006, 0:15:44 UTC - in response to Message 2303. Hi, this particular protein test case returns a lot of failed WUs and it could be due to its large protein size. We are looking into the reason now. Thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure if this is a client or WU problem. But WUID 241813 has now been running for over 24 hours. It has shown as 100% complete for at least the last 14 hours. I'm aborting it. I had to close Boinc to get the Ralph client to end. Boinc showed it had switched to a Seti@home task but task manager showed Ralph 5.27 was still running at 90+% cpu. When I restarted Boinc, it logged the following error... 9/30/2006 11:22:59 AM\|\|Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC 9/30/2006 11:22:59 AM\|ralph@home\|State file error: result DOCK_1EFU_unbound_perturb_benchmark_1315_10_1 is in wrong state 9/30/2006 11:22:59 AM\|\|Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+ This PC is running Boinc 5.6.4 on Win2K. ID: 2304 · Reply Quote