Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.34

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.34

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Path7

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 08
Posts: 56
Credit: 4,974
RAC: 0
Message 4215 - Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 21:35:20 UTC

Hello all,

This WU:
hombench_mtyka_foldcst_loopbuild_boinctest1_foldcst_loopbuild_t297__IGNORE_THE_REST_1D5WA_8_5008_1_0
Started to run at 50 % CPU. Looking at Task Manager I saw another WU (Rosetta Beta 5.98) which should be paused also run at 50 % CPU.
Starting the 5.98 (manually) left Ralph's 1.34 really paused.

Stopping and starting BOINC solved the problem.

Processor: single core AMD Sempron 3000+
Operating System: Windows XP-home SP3
BOINC 5.10.45.

Have a nice day,
Path7.
ID: 4215 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
BigMike
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 06
Posts: 63
Credit: 58,730
RAC: 0
Message 4216 - Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 4:37:57 UTC

Sorry, but I just spotted these failures:

<core_client_version>6.2.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
WARNING: Override of option -out:file:silent sets a different value
WARNING: Override of option -out:file:silent sets a different value

ERROR: Cannot open file workmtykarunhomo_bench\targetst286_starting_models_nonideal1VJGA_3.pdb
ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccoreiopdbpose_io.cc line: 161
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

**********

<core_client_version>6.2.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
ERROR:: Unable to determine sequence length from pdb file
ERROR:: Exit from: .pose.cc line: 2013

</stderr_txt>
]]>

==Mike


Don't believe everything you think.
ID: 4216 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
BigMike
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 06
Posts: 63
Credit: 58,730
RAC: 0
Message 4217 - Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 4:48:07 UTC

Interesting, it looks like this one finished and then restarted itself:

<core_client_version>6.2.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
======================================================
DONE :: 1 starting structures 3521.69 cpu seconds
This process generated 19 decoys from 19 attempts
======================================================

BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...
called boinc_finish
======================================================
DONE :: 1 starting structures 2546.2 cpu seconds
This process generated 2 decoys from 2 attempts
======================================================

BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

==Mike
Don't believe everything you think.
ID: 4217 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 364
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 4218 - Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 13:46:01 UTC

A couple of results that have failed over the last day or so:-
See WU 1104174
and WU 1099957


CPU time 7.392875
stderr out

<core_client_version>5.10.21</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
Loops::add_loop error -- overlapping loop regions
existing loop begin/end: 1/2
new loop begin/end: 2/4
ERROR:: Exit from: src/protocols/loops/LoopClass.cc line: 160
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Trust the information will help.
Conan.
ID: 4218 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 116,623
RAC: 0
Message 4219 - Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 14:32:40 UTC

Credit for all these recent tasks seems to exactly match the claimed credit, rather then using the average claims for the task.

Look at BigMike's report below. Note how his 2546.2 CPU seconds claimed and credit granted only reflect the second go at the WU where 2 models were done rather then the first time when 19 were done.

Interesting too, the task doesn't seem to show his runtime preference.
ID: 4219 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
AdeB
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Dec 07
Posts: 61
Credit: 161,367
RAC: 0
Message 4220 - Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 17:39:45 UTC

Hmm, "NANs occured in hbonding!"
I don't know what it means, but it didn't give any credit.

<core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400

ERROR: NANs occured in hbonding!
ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/hbonds/hbonds_geom.cc line: 763
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>
ID: 4220 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Conan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 364
Credit: 1,368,421
RAC: 0
Message 4223 - Posted: 28 Sep 2008, 11:37:17 UTC - in response to Message 4219.  

Credit for all these recent tasks seems to exactly match the claimed credit, rather then using the average claims for the task.


This has been happening back to the 21/09/08 on every Work Unit I have been given.

The Same Granted Credit as the Claimed Credit, it does not reflect the amount of work done on the work unit.

Also please enable RAC decay, I have asked a number of times in a different thread but nothing has been done.
The statistics for this project are meaningless in regards to current highest contributing user and same goes for the computers.
It is not known who is producing the most work for the project at the moment.
ID: 4223 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 116,623
RAC: 0
Message 4224 - Posted: 28 Sep 2008, 14:07:30 UTC

26hrs and still on model 1, and now it has passed it's deadline. I've canceled it.
It was called hombench_mtyka_foldcst_loopbuild_test1_foldcst_loopbuild_t286__IGNORE_THE_REST_1BWP__4_4982_1_0
ID: 4224 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 116,623
RAC: 0
Message 4229 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 1:48:56 UTC

ID: 4229 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 06
Posts: 104
Credit: 36,890
RAC: 0
Message 4231 - Posted: 30 Sep 2008, 15:05:59 UTC - in response to Message 4205.  

I recieved a similar error message, on this WU

WARNING: Override of option -out:file:silent sets a different value
WARNING: Override of option -out:file:silent sets a different value

<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>hombench_mtyka_looprelax_test_full_2_looprelax_t326__IGNORE_THE_REST_1S1MA_7_4951_1_0_0</file_name>
<error_code>-161</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>

Me too:

<core_client_version>6.2.4</core_client_version>

WARNING: Override of option -out:file:silent sets a different value
WARNING: Override of option -out:file:silent sets a different value
# cpu_run_time_pref: 14400
======================================================
DONE :: 1 starting structures 16363.7 cpu seconds
This process generated 2 decoys from 2 attempts
======================================================

BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...
called boinc_finish

<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>hombench_mtyka_looprelax_test_full_2_looprelax_t374__IGNORE_THE_REST_2FE7A_5_4954_1_2_0</file_name>
<error_code>-161</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>


Peter
ID: 4231 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
markx999

Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 8,018
RAC: 0
Message 4233 - Posted: 2 Oct 2008, 2:26:00 UTC

99.5% done - 9:57 minutes left ans not changing. Otherwise CPU time increasing. Is this normal?

hombench_mtyka_foldcst_loopbuild_boinctest3_foldcst_loopbuild_t315__IGNORE_THE_REST_2F6KA_3_5036_1_0

boinc 5.10.28

ID: 4233 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.34



©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org